Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

How Important Is the Latest Cloning Feat?

Continued from page 1

By Emily Singer

Friday, January 18, 2008

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon

Starting with 25 fresh oocytes, French and colleagues generated five blastocysts--five- to six-day-old embryos consisting of 30 to 70 cells. Rather than attempting to generate stem cell lines from the embryos, the researchers sent them to an independent company for genetic confirmation of their results. "They showed we had completely removed the DNA from the egg donor and replaced it with DNA from the skin-cell donor," says French. One blastocyst was confirmed as a clone via two DNA-fingerprinting methods, while genetic analysis of two others indicated the likelihood that they were clones.

The next crucial step will be generating stem cell lines from cloned embryos, which many stem cell scientists speculate will be the most challenging step. "That's likely where Hwang failed," says Synder.

French and colleagues are planning such experiments, with results potentially in the next eight to twelve months. "The quality of our blastocysts improved with each experiment," says French. Based on the success rate of previous attempts to make stem cells from regular embryos, he estimates that Stemagen will be able to generate a stem cell line from between five and ten cloned embryos and report the results in the next year. The company aims to sell or license the lines to pharmaceutical companies and others who would use them to test new drugs or develop new therapies.

While human therapeutic cloning has always been an ethically contentious area of research--partly because it requires the creation and destruction of human embryos--it has recently come under greater fire. After the announcement of new techniques for reprogramming adult cells so that they turn into stem cells without first forming embryos, some opponents called for a halt on embryonic-stem-cell research. (See "Stem Cells without the Embryos".)

However, researchers in the field emphasize the need to pursue all reprogramming techniques. "Even though there are other techniques to reprogram a cell that have gotten a lot of press, we still don't know how those compare with the reprogramming you actually see with nuclear transfer," says Snyder. "My feeling is, if we understand nuclear transfer better, we will be able to do the other kind of reprogramming more efficiently."

Comments

  • Cloning
    Cloning is a brave new frontier. 
      The problem with it is I see countries that lack a strong moral fiber will use the technology to clone their best and brightest. Or their most powerful.
      Imagine Nobel winning scientist being cloned over and over and going to "special schools".
      A thousand Einstein’s? A thousand Hawkins? Doing the states bidding?
      I do not really see this saving a country from its own structural weaknesses, but the Soviet Union was able to almost able to take over the world by putting a gun to the head of their best and brightest (and everyone else for that matter). 
      In the end freedom of thought and speech promote a much healthier, creative world.
      But countries that do this may really throw a wrench into the works for a couple decades....
      Not to mention it may be a cure for the flaws of Monarchy; the idiot son……and turbulence of succession….
    Rate this comment: 12345

    DennisBuller
    01/18/2008
    Posts:39
    Avg Rating:
    4/5

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement

Videos

Laser-Triggered Chemical Reactions
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Subscribe to Technology Review's daily e-mail update. Enter your e-mail address

TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES

More Technology News from Forbes

Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology © 2009 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.