Biomedicine

Tiny, Sensitive Magnetic-Field Detectors

(Page 2 of 2)

  • Friday, November 16, 2007
  • By Katherine Bourzac

Magnetic measurements are also used to study the brain and the heart. Nerve activity in the brain generates very weak magnetic fields--about 10 orders of magnitude smaller than the earth's. Measuring this weak biomagnetism requires highly sensitive magnetic detectors called SQUIDs, which in turn require superconducting materials. The most sensitive SQUIDs must be cooled to within a few degrees of absolute zero with liquid helium; they cost about $2 million.

Kitching's magnetometers are nearly as sensitive as SQUIDs and can operate at room temperature. He says that they are currently sensitive enough to measure magnetic fields from the heart but not from the brain. "Fetal heart monitoring is getting a lot of attention in the medical field" but is difficult because it's not possible to place electrodes directly on a fetus in utero, says Kitching. "Electrical fields don't get to the surface unaffected [by the mother's tissues], but magnetic fields do," he says.

David Cohen, who made some of the first measurements of biomagnetism in the 1960s, says that Kitching's magnetometers "may get to the point where you can measure the heart," but he is skeptical that they will be used to study brain activity. He doubts that a device using the NIST sensors to detect biomagnetism would end up being any cheaper than those that rely on SQUID.

Another potential use for the sensors is in future MRI scanners. "For noninvasive biological measures, this could be a really interesting thing," says Yael Maguire, who, before founding ThingMagic, in Cambridge, MA, worked on miniaturizing nuclear magnetic resonance detectors, a technology similar to MRI. MRI currently requires its own room, specialized technicians, and a large, strong magnet. "The cost of access to the machines" is a problem with MRI, says Maguire. (See "Better Pictures of Proteins.") Highly sensitive, cheap magnetometers like Kitching's could be incorporated into future MRI scanners, enabling them to use smaller magnets, bringing their cost down, and potentially making them portable.

But such clinical applications are many years away. Right now, Kitching says that he's studying the trade-off between the size and sensitivity of the magnetometers and is also designing chips to carry them.

Print

Related Articles

TR10: Atomic Magnetometers

John Kitching's tiny magnetic-field sensors will take MRI where it's never gone before.

DNA-Based Artificial Nose

Single-stranded DNA can be used to identify explosives and other airborne compounds.

Better Pictures of Proteins

An ultrasensitive NMR probe could improve the diagnosis of diseases such as Alzheimer's.

Close Comments

To comment, please sign in or register

Forgot my password

cyberpageman

53 Comments

  • 1552 Days Ago
  • 11/16/2007

IED magnetic field?

What causes the magnetic field associated with improvised explosive devices or unexploded ordnance?

Reply

Guest (billg.radix.net)

  • 1552 Days Ago
  • 11/16/2007

Re: IED magnetic field?

A magnetic field requires either a flow of current or a ferromagnetic object. There would be a flow of current a few milliseconds before the blast, but that is not very useful. The copper slug is not magnetic.
In the Falkland Islands, the Argentines planted mines on a beach. Plastic mines with plastic explosives and detonators. The Brits left them in place because they don't show up on any mine detector.
  A metal detector, like the airport machines, could find the copper slug, and this magnetomiter might be the ideal sensor. A pulsed magnetic field excites a current flow in the copper, and either a receiver loop or a magnetometer to sense the field after the pulse.
  Otherwise, call Fox Mulder for an X-Files explanation! ;)

Reply

flared0ne

395 Comments

  • 1527 Days Ago
  • 12/11/2007

Still looking/waiting for this...

I'm looking for a (magnetic field detection) mechanism which intrinsically causes a change in the index of refraction of a material -- which isn't that far from the focus of this article -- the goal being to VISUALLY indicate field strengths within a space being physically swept by an emitter-pumped optical fiber, the surface of which becomes "leaky" in proportion to localized field strengths.

Imagine a motorized "mop-head" (constant agitation providing visual access to individual fibers) in a non-contact traverse above a "suspect" landscape, visually indicating local field densities.

Couple this with some form of search coil to pulse the local environment, configured to mask the optical emitter source in phase with the search pulses, to enhance the inherently low-field characteristics of "non-magnetic but conductive" materials...

(Copyright 11DEC2007)

Reply

Advertisement

MAGAZINE

Can We Build Tomorrow's Breakthroughs?

Manufacturing in the United States is in trouble. That's bad news not just for the country's economy but for the future of innovation.

Videos

The Virtual Nurse Will See You Now

More

Advertisement

Technology Review Lists

TR50

Our list of the 50 most innovative companies, including the following:

Goldwind Science and Technology

Joule Unlimited

Applied Materials

Cellular Dynamics International

More

Advertisement

Facebook

Advertisement