Biomedicine

Decoding the Human Eye

(Page 2 of 2)

  • Wednesday, October 24, 2007
  • By Emily Singer

With the UCSC device, scientists can precisely control individual retinal ganglion cells, a capability that will be key in next-generation implants. One of the reasons the prostheses currently in human testing have limited resolution is that they stimulate hundreds of cells simultaneously. (The diameter of the electrodes is an order of magnitude larger than that of most cells.) The five-micrometer-diameter electrodes in Litke's chip are on par with the size of retinal ganglion cells, allowing them to stimulate individual cells. The researchers previously showed that they could simultaneously control multiple cells with a 60-electrode version of the chip, and they are developing a version with 512 electrodes.

Now that scientists have created a technology with such a precise level of control, they are using it to study the language of the retina--a language they hope prostheses will ultimately be able to speak. While the retina is often likened to a camera, it is in reality much more complicated. Light signals are captured and processed in the retina; the sequences of electrical bursts sent to the brain by the various and distinct retinal ganglion cell types encode different aspects of the visual field, such as movement, spatial patterns, color. Current prostheses use a simplified code and thus lose information, just as Morse code loses the nuanced intonations of the spoken word and the facial expressions of the speaker. "What are the patterns that really emulate what the healthy retina would be doing?" asks Alexander Sher, an assistant researcher at UCSC who is collaborating with Litke. "If you get to the point where you can stimulate individual cells, and you know how individual cells encode information, you can simulate that exactly, or nearly exactly."

Scientists at Second Sight say that the lessons learned from these studies will be crucial to the development of next-generation prostheses. But turning the UCSC researchers' device into an implant fit for the human eye will be challenging. "A lot of technical considerations are preventing us from jumping to really tiny electrodes," says McMahon. "That will require further developments in electronics and packaging and software."

Print

Related Articles

A Brighter Future for Retinal Implants

Implants may be commonplace in only a couple of years.

Regenerating Neurons in Eyes

Researchers stimulate the growth of new retinal cells in mice.

Next-Generation Retinal Implant

Scientists plan to test an implanted chip with four times the resolution of the previous version in people blinded by retinal degeneration.

Close Comments

To comment, please sign in or register

Forgot my password

jhertzberg

15 Comments

  • 1575 Days Ago
  • 10/24/2007

What about color?

As a person with moderate RP, I have followed the development of retinal prosthetics with keen personal interest. The one facet of vision that has been lacking in most articles and presentations has been color perception. Is this because it is not considered as important by researchers as shape, luminosity, and motion, or is an intrinsically harder problem to solve?

Reply

Gurthang

52 Comments

  • 1575 Days Ago
  • 10/24/2007

Re: What about color?

I think it is because they still have too few connections to the retina. I suspect they if they can ever reach the level of interface with the individual gangleons and somehow are able to determine the function of each one you might get to that level. Though I wonder if at some point it will be easier to connect at the optic nerve level or the retina level once we better understand the visual "protocol" they use.

Reply

Emily Singer

26 Comments

  • 1575 Days Ago
  • 10/24/2007

Re: What about color?

Great question. I posed it to one of the scientists I interviewed for the piece and should have an answer to post later today.

Reply

Emily Singer

26 Comments

  • 1575 Days Ago
  • 10/24/2007

Re: What about color?

Response from Alexander Sher, a UCSC scientist involved in the research:
Reproduction of color perception through electrical stimulation is indeed difficult: at least three distinct retinal ganglion cell types
are thought to relay color information to the brain, each encoding intensity of one of the three fundamental color combinations. Thus, one
would need to be able to selectively stimulate retinal ganglion cells of (at least these three) specific types. Such an ability would be beneficial not only for eliciting the perception of color but for refining all other aspects of visual perception. The described technology of simultaneous stimulation and recording of retinal activity is well suited to study the feasibility of such a selective stimulation.

Reply

WJHalverson

2 Comments

  • 1575 Days Ago
  • 10/24/2007

Optic nerve vs retina

Given that artificial retinas have to be connected into the optic nerve, why not focus effort on replacing the retina?

Reply

manhatanangel

3 Comments

  • 1575 Days Ago
  • 10/24/2007

Re: Optic nerve vs retina

iI would love to know everything about it and the name of the Co making this product I can be a candidate for this product, and an investor of this co please reply Carmen Andrade

Reply

manhatanangel

3 Comments

  • 1575 Days Ago
  • 10/24/2007

the product and the stock

please call me or let me know

Reply

Advertisement

Emerald

1 Comment

  • 1569 Days Ago
  • 10/30/2007

optic nerve disorder

do the artificial retina could work if there is an optic nerve disorder?

Reply

Machine

1 Comment

  • 1569 Days Ago
  • 10/30/2007

Re: optic nerve disorder

Please contact us at:
patients@2-sight.com

Reply

opticdamage

1 Comment

  • 774 Days Ago
  • 01/02/2010

Re: optic nerve disorder

Can the artificial retina technology be applied to vision loss due to Glaucoma - optic disc and nerve damage?

Reply

rkj4all

1 Comment

  • 1442 Days Ago
  • 03/05/2008

wt about this ?!

hi all,

i need any 1 for this project.
im working at project some like this...

my email is eng.juneide@gmail.com

Reply

Advertisement

MAGAZINE

Can We Build Tomorrow's Breakthroughs?

Manufacturing in the United States is in trouble. That's bad news not just for the country's economy but for the future of innovation.

Videos

The Virtual Nurse Will See You Now

More

Advertisement

Technology Review Lists

TR50

Our list of the 50 most innovative companies, including the following:

Applied Materials

Life Technologies

Pacific Biosciences

PrimeSense

More

Advertisement

Facebook

Advertisement