Test bed: A 512-electrode array (gold circle), modeled after detectors used to capture particles in high-energy physics, is helping to decipher the neural code of the retina. The findings will aid in the design of future retinal prostheses.
Alan Litke

Biomedicine

Decoding the Human Eye

Superdense arrays of electrodes will bring scientists closer to an artificial retina that approximates normal vision.

  • Wednesday, October 24, 2007
  • By Emily Singer

Artificial retinas are already in human clinical trials at the University of Southern California, where they have helped blind patients distinguish walls from doorways and even watch soccer games, albeit as blurs of motion. But approximating normal vision--and possibly enabling people to read--will require devices that can deliver electrical current with much greater control and precision. A new chip densely packed with electrodes, developed by scientists at the University of California, Santa Cruz (UCSC), is the first step in that direction.

Currently being used in research, the chip can stimulate and record from individual cells in retinal samples. The technology will provide insight into how the retina codes information and how to mimic that coding--lessons that will be crucial in developing the next generation of retinal implants. Further down the road, some version of the technology might be used to send visual information down the optic nerve.

"The retina is a very sophisticated visual-information-processing device," says Alan Litke, a physicist at UCSC who is applying his expertise to neurobiology. "To have a human patient someday approach normal visual functioning, such as reading, you need to have a very accurate level of control."

The retina is a thin layer of cells at the back of the eye; photoreceptor cells in the retina detect light and send signals to the retinal ganglion cells, which then transmit the signals to the brain through the optic nerve. In macular degeneration and retinitis pigmentosa, two leading causes of blindness, photoreceptor cells are damaged, but the remaining retinal ganglion cells are left largely intact. Artificial retinas, which rely on an external camera to capture visual information, consist of a processor that translates that information into an electrical code intelligible to the nerve cells of the eye, and a chip dotted with tiny electrodes that transmit the electrical signals to the retinal ganglion cells.

Advertisement

Litke and his collaborators modeled their chip after the silicon microchip detectors that line supercolliders to capture signs of elusive, high-energy, subatomic particles, such as the Higgs boson. Using common integrated-circuit fabrication techniques, the researchers custom-built more than 500 electrodes and amplifiers onto a small glass strip. "There are other commercial, multi-electrode recording systems available, but the team at UCSC has really pushed the technology forward by coming up with a system with the capability to record many more neural responses," says Matt McMahon, a scientist at Second Sight, the company based in Sylmar, CA, that's developing the retinal prostheses used in the USC study. Second Sight is using Litke's device to inform the design of future prostheses. The company's first-generation device had 16 electrodes, the second-generation device currently in human trials has 60, and a 200-electrode version is under development. (See "Next-Generation Retinal Implant.")

Print

Related Articles

A Brighter Future for Retinal Implants

Implants may be commonplace in only a couple of years.

Regenerating Neurons in Eyes

Researchers stimulate the growth of new retinal cells in mice.

Next-Generation Retinal Implant

Scientists plan to test an implanted chip with four times the resolution of the previous version in people blinded by retinal degeneration.

Close Comments

To comment, please sign in or register

Forgot my password

jhertzberg

15 Comments

  • 1575 Days Ago
  • 10/24/2007

What about color?

As a person with moderate RP, I have followed the development of retinal prosthetics with keen personal interest. The one facet of vision that has been lacking in most articles and presentations has been color perception. Is this because it is not considered as important by researchers as shape, luminosity, and motion, or is an intrinsically harder problem to solve?

Reply

Gurthang

52 Comments

  • 1575 Days Ago
  • 10/24/2007

Re: What about color?

I think it is because they still have too few connections to the retina. I suspect they if they can ever reach the level of interface with the individual gangleons and somehow are able to determine the function of each one you might get to that level. Though I wonder if at some point it will be easier to connect at the optic nerve level or the retina level once we better understand the visual "protocol" they use.

Reply

Emily Singer

26 Comments

  • 1575 Days Ago
  • 10/24/2007

Re: What about color?

Great question. I posed it to one of the scientists I interviewed for the piece and should have an answer to post later today.

Reply

Emily Singer

26 Comments

  • 1575 Days Ago
  • 10/24/2007

Re: What about color?

Response from Alexander Sher, a UCSC scientist involved in the research:
Reproduction of color perception through electrical stimulation is indeed difficult: at least three distinct retinal ganglion cell types
are thought to relay color information to the brain, each encoding intensity of one of the three fundamental color combinations. Thus, one
would need to be able to selectively stimulate retinal ganglion cells of (at least these three) specific types. Such an ability would be beneficial not only for eliciting the perception of color but for refining all other aspects of visual perception. The described technology of simultaneous stimulation and recording of retinal activity is well suited to study the feasibility of such a selective stimulation.

Reply

WJHalverson

2 Comments

  • 1575 Days Ago
  • 10/24/2007

Optic nerve vs retina

Given that artificial retinas have to be connected into the optic nerve, why not focus effort on replacing the retina?

Reply

manhatanangel

3 Comments

  • 1575 Days Ago
  • 10/24/2007

Re: Optic nerve vs retina

iI would love to know everything about it and the name of the Co making this product I can be a candidate for this product, and an investor of this co please reply Carmen Andrade

Reply

manhatanangel

3 Comments

  • 1575 Days Ago
  • 10/24/2007

the product and the stock

please call me or let me know

Reply

Advertisement

Emerald

1 Comment

  • 1569 Days Ago
  • 10/30/2007

optic nerve disorder

do the artificial retina could work if there is an optic nerve disorder?

Reply

Machine

1 Comment

  • 1569 Days Ago
  • 10/30/2007

Re: optic nerve disorder

Please contact us at:
patients@2-sight.com

Reply

opticdamage

1 Comment

  • 774 Days Ago
  • 01/02/2010

Re: optic nerve disorder

Can the artificial retina technology be applied to vision loss due to Glaucoma - optic disc and nerve damage?

Reply

rkj4all

1 Comment

  • 1442 Days Ago
  • 03/05/2008

wt about this ?!

hi all,

i need any 1 for this project.
im working at project some like this...

my email is eng.juneide@gmail.com

Reply

Advertisement

MAGAZINE

Can We Build Tomorrow's Breakthroughs?

Manufacturing in the United States is in trouble. That's bad news not just for the country's economy but for the future of innovation.

Videos

The Virtual Nurse Will See You Now

More

Advertisement

Technology Review Lists

TR50

Our list of the 50 most innovative companies, including the following:

Novartis

IBM

Siemens

Claros Diagnostics

More

Advertisement

Facebook

Advertisement