The Chinese Solar Machine Layer by Layer Fire in the Library The Mystery Behind Anesthesia
Look sharp: A new artificial cornea developed by German researchers is made from a commercial polymer, but its edges are coated with a special protein. The protein signals cornea cells to latch on to the implant, anchoring it to the eye but leaving its optical center clear.
Fraunhofer Institute
For millions with eye damage, a new artificial cornea could prove a safer, more effective treatment.
A novel artificial cornea that adheres to eye cells could bring new hope to the estimated 10 million people worldwide who are blind because of corneal damage or disease. The new design should relieve some of the complications--such as tissue rejection--that often accompany corneal transplants or the implantation of existing artificial corneas. The device, which has been extensively tested in rabbits, is expected to be in clinical trials early next year.
Existing artificial corneas are held in place solely by sutures, which leaves patients susceptible to inflammation, infection, and even losing an eye, says John Huang, an assistant professor in the Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science at the Yale University School of Medicine. "We certainly need a better way to get an artificial cornea in place," he says.
Today's implants are large--"just one big piece of plastic," says Huang--but they have to be, to prevent excess corneal tissue from growing over them and impairing patients' vision. In the long run, however, their size can be problematic: the difficulty of stitching them into place increases the chance that the surgical wound will reopen or become inflamed, says Huang. The implants are also too big to be stitched directly to eye tissue. Instead, they are built around a layer of corneal tissue extracted from a donor, which acts as a bridge to the recipient's tissue.
The key to the new implant is a protein-coated polymer developed by researchers at the Fraunhofer Institute, in Postdam, Germany; the group is led by Joachim Storsberg, head of the institute's medical-polymer research unit. The polymer, which is commercially available, repels water, so it won't absorb tear-duct secretions that could cause it to swell. It also prohibits cell growth, so natural tissue will not cloud it over.
This is an advantage at the center of the implant, which needs to remain clear. But it would be a disadvantage at the edges, which need to bind to existing corneal tissue. So the outer rim of the cornea is coated with a protein that attracts existing corneal cells. "This special coating allows the implant to firmly connect with the cells [of the natural cornea]," says Storsberg. Although the new implant still has to be sutured into place, that firm connection helps prevent the kind of infection that posed problems in earlier implants. The protein was also chosen for its ability to withstand the thermal sterilization process that the device must go through to meet medical-safety requirements.
And because the German researchers' polymer prevents cell growth, the implant can be made small enough to be sutured directly to the eye. As a consequence, the layer of donor tissue is unnecessary. This is a "huge advantage," says Huang. Donor corneal tissue is in short supply, so existing implants end up using tissue of poor quality.
Latest machine for DRY EYES Special non-invasive diagnostic instrument available only at G.G.S.I.EYE RESEARCH & CURE CENTRE which can detect the dry eyes in 5 secs which is never picked up other dry eye tests, it is very useful in early treating & diagnosing dry eye Thermometry and humidity measurements in a dry eye patient had a 100% diagnostic value.FOR MORE DETAILS LOG ON For more details log on http://www.visioncareindia.com/dryeye.htm see dry eye slide section see http://www.visioncareindia.com/slides/closedchamber.htm
Would like to have more information on this. I have retinal detachment in one eye. Lost eyesight,had corneal transplant, cataract & retinal attachment surgeries twenty years back.I am more concerned if the outlook of the eye could change!Also my eyeball hurts, can something be done about it? Pl guide.
Beginnig of February 2011 I had a cataract in my left eye removed. Operation was a success, but my vision in that eye is still impaired. My doctor took 2 pictures with a ZEISS camera that showed, that my cornea looked like a vulcano. He has me using PredinsoLONE 1%, 2 drops a day. Has anybody a suggestion what can be done in this case? My vision is still blurry in that eye.
Thank you! Siegfried.
you mentioned it looks like a volcano. It could be ectasia? I'm not sure. But you might want to look it up. Treatment for ectasia is mentioned in my above post (ie collagen crosslinking, Intacs, or a combination of both). Failing that corneal transplants. Both human or synthetic. I wish you all the best.
Manufacturing in the United States is in trouble. That's bad news not just for the country's economy but for the future of innovation.
Our list of the 50 most innovative companies, including the following:
kris.38
2 Comments
Eye Repair
A person is having a glass on right eye for -13. Can she be benefitted by this technology. She is 65 years old
Reply
deirdrebeth
25 Comments
Re: Eye Repair
This technology is used when the cornea is no longer usable. If she can see, but just has bad vision, this is not what she's looking for.
Reply
lmburk
1 Comment
Re: Eye Repair
So what is the definition of unusable cornea? If the person can still see, but not well - what is the quality of life and work?
I had RK/AK surgery and had over 30 cuts per eye. My vision is poor with quadruple vision, blurriness, star bursts, and radial rings around bright lights that blind me at night while driving. The shape of my corneas is like a pie that fell after removing from the oven. It is now concave in shape not convex.
Contact lenses are helping, but in my line of work as an electronic engineer, I feel my vision is becoming more a hindrance. Can I see, Yes. But for my career, not so good. I no longer have fine detail in my vision. Can't read well the fine print on electronic components without the aid of a microscope (reading glasses are useless) when a person of normal vision has no troubles.
I suffer multiple vison of shapes causing such fuzziness that I can no longer see clearly. If I have to continue to defer my work to a person with better vision, I feel my employer may decide to remove me for a better sighted person because I take longer and am costlier to do the work.
It feels funny and yet, doesn't work well to wear contact lenses and glasses at the same time in order to see.
The cornea is the problem - contact lenses and glasses are the band-aids. I really hope this new artificial cornea works because I'm learning that there are others, like me, with the same or similar problem I am experiencing. All we want is our clear and sharp vision back. It seems to me replacing a broken or run-down cornea even if there is still vision capability is a better solution than the band-aids. Especially when a career is on the line. Its what is driving people to risk the AK/RK and Lasik surgeries in the first place. To get rid of the contacts and glasses that are an inconvenience and a nuisance.
Lonnie Burk
Reply
theverns
1 Comment
Re: Eye Repair
Hello
I am an engineer for PSEG at a nuclear generating facility in New Jersey.
Your problem description mirrors mine. I had RK in Texas in 1980. I cannot see dependably at any focal distance and have significant horizontal linear distortion in my left eye (there is no such thing as a straight line).
I see your post is from 2007. Have you had any revelations since?
Would appreciate knowing if there are any viable options for folks like us.
thanks
Reply
pristineus
3 Comments
Re: Eye Repair
I've been doing some research on this and it seems to be quite common among those who went for surgeries for their eyes. It's horrible and I only recently found out there were such potential complications. Sounds like it may be Post-refractive surgery ectasia, although this may also be keratonocous (not sure if I spelled it right).
Unfortunately, I am only a student and my expertise on the matter is only what I find online. However, I would recommend to look for riboflavin collagen crosslinking (sometimes the words cxl are mentioned) and Intacs. These can sometimes be used in a combination by a skilled practitioner for more effective results. Failing that, corneal transplants would be next. First human donor, then artificial. I wish you all the best and hope that many more good alternatives will come up soon.
Reply
pristineus
3 Comments
Re: Eye Repair
Just to bring this to the attention of anybody who might be reading this. Intacs and collagen crosslinking with riboflavin are regularly used to treat ectasia or keratonocus. However, do not forget that these too, are surgeries and come with further risks. I have seen several mentions that Intacs might negatively affect endothelial cells of the user, cause cataracts and the surgery itself has complications. However, in the case of ectasia/keratonocus it might be better for you to undertake these corrective steps first (the sooner you treat it, the better). Once your condition has stabilized and your cornea no longer progressively bulges, then maybe you might want to take the Intacs out.
The risks for corrective surgery may far outweigh the risks of leaving your condition in its current state. Do NOT just take my word for it. Talk to a number of established professionals with plenty of experience. Some may specialize in the rehabilitation of post-refractive surgeries. Also, do plenty of your own research. Get numerous and unbiased opinions from other professionals. Remember that you are entitled to second opinions (and third, fourth, fifth...etc).
I am not too clear on what other risks are possible but I strongly encourage that you research it thoroughly and persistently. Do not take the lack of information to be the same as a lack of risks.
I have no background or training under medicine or the treatment of any eye-diseases or conditions. However, everything I say is based on research done online. Keep in mind that you should take everything you read online with a pinch of salt.
Also, if you are considering any refractive surgeries, please think long and hard. If complications should arise (I sincerely hope none will), these may have to be treated with other steps which will have their own risks of even more complications arising, so on and so forth.
Reply