Safe passage: A new polymer is as effective as viruses for gene therapy, but it appears to cause none of viruses’ sometimes deadly side effects. Part of the polymer, which has been tested in mice with ovarian cancer, is pictured here.
Jordan Green - MIT

Biomedicine

Gene Therapy without Viruses

A new, highly effective polymer may make gene therapy safer.

  • Wednesday, September 12, 2007
  • By Katherine Bourzac

The promise of gene therapy has long been held up by the lack of a safe and effective way to insert the desired therapeutic genes into the right cells. To solve that problem, MIT researchers have developed a new polymer for gene therapy that is as effective as viruses, the standard carriers, but it seems to have none of the risks of viral treatments. The researchers have successfully tested a version of the polymer in mice with ovarian cancer, and they believe they can further modify the polymer to target virtually any cell in the body.

Gene therapy works by delivering to a specific group of diseased cells copies of a gene that corrects what ails them. "If you could get it [a gene] where it's needed, you could treat many diseases," says the MIT Center for Cancer Research's Daniel Anderson, one of the leaders of the polymer research group.

The most effective way to get therapeutic genes to the right cells in the body has been by inserting them into viruses, which are then injected into patients. But a series of high-profile setbacks has raised questions about the safety of using viral vectors. Injections of these viruses have caused dangerous, and in several cases deadly, immune reactions in some patients. (See "The Glimmering Promise of Gene Therapy.") And one class of viruses used for gene therapy can cause leukemia. There are currently many viral gene therapies in clinical trials, but none have been approved by the Food and Drug Administration.

These problems in clinical trials using viruses have spurred researchers to search for synthetic alternatives for delivering gene therapy. "Polymers have been shown safe in people for years," says Robert Langer, a professor of chemical engineering at MIT and a pioneer in biomaterials research. The polymers under development by the MIT group are relatively inexpensive to manufacture and break down into harmless byproducts in the body. The kind of polymer used as a starting material by the MIT researchers naturally associates with DNA and can succeed in delivering genes into cells.

Advertisement

"They have something comparable [in effectiveness] to viruses," says David Putnam, assistant professor of chemical and biomolecular engineering at Cornell University. "No one has been able to achieve this."

The MIT researchers succeeded because they have developed rapid systems for developing and testing large numbers of polymers, says Putnam. "A lot of materials development is a numbers game," he explains, and the MIT group can design and test new polymers "an order of magnitude faster than everybody else."

The MIT researchers have previously used an unmodified version of the polymer to selectively deliver a suicide gene to prostate tumors in mice. For their current research, published last week in Advanced Materials, they experimented with making small chemical changes to the ends of the polymers.

Print

Related Articles

The Glimmering Promise of Gene Therapy

Its history is marred by failures, false hopes, and even death, but for a number of the most horrendous human diseases, gene therapy still holds the promise of a cure. Now, for the first time, there is reason to believe that it is actually working.

Gene Therapy Helps Against Cancer

Ongoing and planned human tests take a promising approach to fighting cancer by boosting the immune system.

A Death in Philadelphia

An experimental gene-therapy treatment kills an eighteen-year-old volunteer in a clinical trial. Is this the final blow for a much-beleaguered technology?

Close Comments

To comment, please sign in or register

Forgot my password

Elroch

56 Comments

  • 1617 Days Ago
  • 09/12/2007

This could be BIG

The potential of this development is awe-inspiring, going way beyond cancer therapies, with even genetic diseases being potential applications. For example it might be possible to add the correct genes to certain natural cells in the body which possess a defective gene.

Reply

Guest (Gblaze43)

  • 1617 Days Ago
  • 09/12/2007

Re: This could be BIG

Or even, possibly, enhancing what we already have?!

Reply

Guest (Gblaze43)

  • 1617 Days Ago
  • 09/12/2007

Re: This could be BIG

Or even, possibly, enhancing what we already have?!

Reply

Urbanstatue

5 Comments

  • 1617 Days Ago
  • 09/12/2007

Cystic Fibrosis

This really is fantastic news. 

I myself suffer from cystic fibrosis, a genetic disease which has been on the forefront of genetic testing for some time.  Due to the known location of the defective gene, and the relative ease of treating lung tissue -- e.g. inhalator medication -- it is ideally suited for genetically engineered treatment.  Progress has already been made with viruses as vectors.

News like this gets me very excited.  I can only hope they work long nights, prove this vector's safety and start testing on humans SOON.  It will make me, quite literally, breathe easier.

Reply

ophis

1 Comment

  • 1616 Days Ago
  • 09/13/2007

Re: Cystic Fibrosis

Well, before we get *too* excited over this admittedly great advance, let's remember the fact that every transgene expressed in a cell is "non-self" and thus apt to come under CD8+ attack sooner or later. Getting the gene inside the target cell is one thing; keeping it there another; and resetting the immune system so to make it accept the transgene quite another. (Personally, I do not think there is any master switch for doing this resetting as this might be an Achilles heel for microbes.) But maybe... perhaps this system can also be used to introduce the gene of interest into thymocytes... and maybe this will be sufficient to beguile immune surveillance... let's hope it...

Reply

carlii

30 Comments

  • 1554 Days Ago
  • 11/14/2007

Treatment Screening Recommendation

The statement that polymers have been shown safe in patients is reassuring.  Would it ever be the case that a patient would have a reaction to a polymer, like some patients have allergic reactions to allergies, and reactions to viruses?  I know the body's rejection of virus therapies can be tested for ahead of time, just like allergies can be tested ahead of time too. If there is a chance for a reaction to polymers, is there a test for any type of similar reactions (like allergy, viral, etc.) for this new therapy?

Reply

Advertisement

MAGAZINE

Can We Build Tomorrow's Breakthroughs?

Manufacturing in the United States is in trouble. That's bad news not just for the country's economy but for the future of innovation.

Videos

The Virtual Nurse Will See You Now

More

Advertisement

Technology Review Lists

TR50

Our list of the 50 most innovative companies, including the following:

Geron

Square

1366 Technologies

Serious Materials

More

Advertisement

Facebook

Advertisement