Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

The $2 Million Genome

James Watson, codiscoverer of the structure of DNA, now has a copy of his very own genome. Will you be next?

By Emily Singer

Friday, June 01, 2007

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon

On Thursday, James Watson was handed a DVD containing his entire genome, sequenced in the past few months by 454, a company based in Branford, CT, that's developing next-generation technologies for efficiently reading the genome. At a cost of $2 million, 454 sequenced Watson's genome for roughly an order of magnitude less than it would have cost using traditional machines. While this is still too expensive for the average Joe, experts say that the advance marks a major milestone toward personal-genome sequencing--and more-personalized medicine--for all.

DNA’s daddy: James Watson, pictured above, predicted the structure of DNA more than 50 years ago. On Thursday, he received a copy of his own genome as part of a landmark gene-sequencing project.
Credit: National Library of Medicine

"We've heard people talking about personalized medicine for the last year or two, but this is the first concrete incarnation of that whole era," says George Weinstock, codirector of the Human Genome Sequencing Center at Baylor College of Medicine, in Houston. Scientists at Baylor collaborated on the genome project.

The $2 million and two months that it took to sequence Watson's genome is a far cry from the more than ten years and $3 billion required for the Human Genome Project's reference genome, released in 2003. Scientists ultimately hope to bring the cost down to less than $10,000, a target price that many believe will be the turning point in genomic medicine. At that price, many people could afford to have their genomes sequenced, and doctors could then use that data to give their patients more-personalized medical advice.

At a press conference at Baylor on Thursday announcing the completion of the genome, 454's founder, Jonathan Rothberg, compared the company's sequencing innovations with the technological advances that shrank computers to a size small enough for personal use. 454's machines run the sequencing reactions on chips smaller than a playing card, drilled with 800,000 tiny holes. Each chip can run hundreds of thousands of sequencing reactions in a single experiment, compared with the 96 reactions possible when scientists initially sequenced the human genome. (See "Sequencing in a Flash.")

While Watson's genome represents a landmark in human sequencing and will be the subject of extensive research, it's unlikely to be immediately useful to the geneticist on a personal level. Scientists did not find any of the hot-button mutations that guarantee that Watson would develop a certain disease. (Given that Watson has made it safely into his late seventies, this is relatively unsurprising.) They did, however, identify several mutations that boost the risk of cancer, including one linked to breast cancer. "I've had basal-cell carcinoma since the age of 28," Watson said at the press conference. "Whether there is any connection, I don't know." Adding that his sister had suffered from serious breast cancer, he said, "I take comfort in the fact that it largely affects women, and that I don't have any daughters. If I did, I would tell them to immediately check if they had [that mutation]."

Story continues below

Scientists also identified several hundred other interesting mutations--genetic variations that might affect the function or expression of a gene. While many mutations of this type have no observable effect,25 of Watson's variants have been linked to some phenotypic effect in other studies, says Richard Gibbs, director of Baylor's sequencing center. "But none have obvious health implications," he says.

Watson's genome will be difficult to interpret until scientists have gathered a larger database housing hundreds or thousands of people's genomes, along with their personal characteristics, medical histories, and other information. That information will allow geneticists to correlate specific variations with different medical and more-general attributes, such as musical skill or athletic ability, ultimately giving a new level of meaning to the genome.

Comments

  • useless without compatible annotation
    Just the genomic sequence alone of James Watson is actually of very little use in real scientific research, just as Craig Venters sequence. This is because it does not have annotation: genes, intron-exon structure, associated identifiers... without this information it can not be used for further computationally based research.
    The excellent database from UCSC, ensembl, and other sites, do provide such annotation for the human genome. Scientists rely on these databases and only because there is a norm, we can work with it. Often you can't even use data from different sources if they are in respect to a different assembly - now, if there are even from different sequencing projects, then you would need to do a lot of coordinate conversions and such before you can start trying to combine this information.
    Of course you can try to produce this information yourself by installing the KnownGene database software, for example, and doing the annotation yourself for Watson's genome - but this is far too much work (=time consuming) for most bioinformatics projects.
    So it's not of much use really until someone puts a lot of additional work in it and provides annotation for Watson's genome which is compatible to the coordinates of the human genome (f.e. hg18).
    Rate this comment: 12345

    anton
    06/02/2007
    Posts:7
    Avg Rating:
    5/5

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement
Technology Review July/August 2009

Current Issue

Search Me
Inside the launch of Stephen Wolfram’s new “computational knowledge engine.”
•  Subscribe
Save 41%
•  Table of Contents
•  MIT News
Advertisement

Follow us on Twitter

RSS Feeds

Twitter
xml icon TR Top Stories
xml icon TR Editors' Blog
xml icon TR Video Blog
xml icon TR Video
Advertisement
Subscribe to Technology Review's daily e-mail update. Enter your e-mail address

Advertisement
TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES

More Technology News from Forbes

Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology © 2009 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.