Biomedicine

Hunting Poachers Remotely

(Page 2 of 2)

  • Monday, May 14, 2007
  • By Bijal Trivedi

The tropical forests of the Congo Basin are geographically vast, remote, and impossible to patrol for illegal bush-meat hunting, say the researchers. Park-ranger patrols in tropical Africa often rely on intelligence information from informants, which can be unreliable or outdated. Even if the information is accurate, the timing of missions and regions targeted by patrol units rarely intersects with poacher activity.

The problem, says Gulick, is that the parks are understaffed. The Nouabalé-Ndoki National Park, for example, covers an area of 400,000 hectares (roughly 1,500 square miles). Yet only about 15 rangers man the area, says Gulick. "The patrols are infrequent and random, and the probability of catching poachers is almost zero."

Because the vegetation is dense, both people and animals tend to traverse the parks via well-established trails. Gulick's metal detectors are designed to be buried in the ground along these trails. Two detectors buried about 100 meters apart reveal the direction in which the poachers are headed. To avoid false alarms, the detectors only respond to ferrous metals such as iron and steel. Aluminum tent poles, for example, wouldn't trigger a response. The sensitivity of the devices can also be fine-tuned so that items such as pocketknives slip by undetected. Rangers and other park personnel who need to carry rifles would carry a device that would signal their identity to the detectors.

Many other groups have also expressed an interest in using Gulick's system. James Gibbs, a conservation biologist at the State University of New York (SUNY) College of Environmental Science and Forestry, in Syracuse, thinks that TrailGuard could be a valuable tool for protecting the heavily poached snow leopard in the Altai region of Central Asia, as well as the giant tortoises that inhabit the Galapagos Islands.

"With vast tracts of wilderness, trapping poachers is like looking for a needle in a haystack," says Gibbs, who met Gulick while working in the Altai and invited him to SUNY as a visiting scholar. "But TrailGuard could improve the efficiency in the [park rangers'] response. There would be less poking around in the dark."

"I don't think it will solve all problems," Gibbs continues. "There may be issues with deployment, data collection, and ramping up the production [of the sensors]. But it could potentially change the nature of interactions with poachers."

Print

Close Comments

To comment, please sign in or register

Forgot my password

mkogrady

425 Comments

  • 1737 Days Ago
  • 05/14/2007

Sensors

Please get about 100,000 of these things to our Border Guards so we can be notified when hoards of Canadians and Mexicans start crossing into  America illegally. Have Google put the maps up so we can see the action in realtime too! The entertainment value Beats American Idol by a long shot! If placed properly we can detect where to build the fences first instead of looking for well worn trails in the bruch and forests.

Reply

abcarterjr

45 Comments

  • 1737 Days Ago
  • 05/14/2007

Wildfire Sensing

Add smoke sensing and GPS then  deploy in national forests.

Reply

nekote

139 Comments

  • 1736 Days Ago
  • 05/15/2007

Measure / Counter measure?

The bad guys will probably very quickly know all about this.

They too poor / unsophisticated to take obvious counter measures ASAP?
Detect, locate and disable the sensors?
Jamming?
Locate / jam the "hubs", to decapitate nearby sensors?

Seems like the good guys will need to aggressively try to stay ahead of the curve - LPI (Low Probability of Intercept), spread spectrum, decoys, intermittent time shifted reporting, frequent "reseeding" of sensors, ... ?

Reply

Advertisement

MAGAZINE

Can We Build Tomorrow's Breakthroughs?

Manufacturing in the United States is in trouble. That's bad news not just for the country's economy but for the future of innovation.

Videos

The Virtual Nurse Will See You Now

More

Advertisement

Technology Review Lists

TR50

Our list of the 50 most innovative companies, including the following:

iRobot

Synthetic Genomics

Apple

BIND Biosciences

More

Advertisement

Facebook

Advertisement