Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

Gene Variant Linked to Heart Disease

Continued from page 1

By Bijal Trivedi

Friday, May 04, 2007

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon

Regardless of the differences between the studies, the fundamental findings are the same, both McPherson and Stefansson stress.

The researchers anticipate that the identification of the variant will lead to new DNA-based diagnostic tests that could identify young people at high risk for heart disease. With a new test, physicians could potentially select the high-risk patients who would benefit most from lifestyle changes and drugs like aspirin, statins, and the like. This is a disease for which there are "good preventive therapies," says McPherson.

The newly identified genetic risk variant is not actually a gene; rather, it's a segment of DNA that falls in the vicinity of two genes previously implicated in cancer. "Our experience is that almost all these variants that predispose to the common diseases are not in the coding sequence of genes," says Stefansson. "They are outside the coding sequence and influence expression. I'm not surprised to find them some distance away from genes."

In just the past week, the location of the risk variant has become a hot spot in the genome. Four independent teams, including DeCode, published reports linking the same region on chromosome 9 to diabetes.

"I think this is a stunner," says Francis Collins, director of the National Human Genome Research Institute, in Bethesda, MD, and leader of one of the four teams, during a seminar on genome-wide association studies. "This is like the seat of the soul of the genome. It seems like this one place carries all of that weight for two very common and very dangerous diseases."

Comments

  • This study is junk science
    Another news piece on this study said explicitly that they do not have any idea by what mechanism these mutations cause heart disease.  There are only two ways to develop heart disease; faulty cholesterol metabolism, and impaired glucose metabolism, both easy to clinically demonstrate in large numbers of the people who have them well before tehy actually get heart disease as many people did during the course of this study.   You can't do genetic medical research by just feeding in genetic code and printing a computer printout, you have to do actual medicine.  How could they make no effort to learn which common glaring and easy to detect metabolic problem ailed their research subjects with the genetic mutations who developed heart disease?   We're talking about several tests for impaired glucose metabolism and one simple blood test for high cholesterol!  This study is junk science, and it needs to be condemned as such.   Mutations might be there, might not, but the people who did this study need to be drummed out of their profession as an example to other scientists to make sure they've grown heads before they do research.  
    Rate this comment: 12345

    villandra
    05/04/2007
    Posts:1
    Avg Rating:
    5/5
    • Re: This study is junk science
      Well, I'm certainly glad you're not the one that decides who gets research funding.  That policy of considering any research as junk if it doesn't give you 100% of the answer right now, would rule out a vast majority of medical research.

      This seems like pretty important breakthrough in our knowledge of heart disease.  Next step may indeed be studies to try to link particular genetic markers with corresponding clinical indicators such as elevated serum cholesterol or blood sugar imbalances.  Final step would then probably be trying to figure out exact metabolic pathways that account for the physiological changes associated with the genes.

      To almost any scientist in the world the phrase junk science would imply flawed studies where the claimed result is not demonstrated by the experiment or analysis.  You certainly seem to be expanding the meaning, counterproductively I might add, by labeling something junk merely because you think a particular researcher should have started with a different set of goals for a particular study.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      rhapsodyingl...
      05/08/2007
      Posts:59
      Avg Rating:
      4/5

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement

Videos

Prescription: Networking
Technology Review November/December 2009

Current Issue

Natural Gas Changes the Energy Map
The United States has vast supplies of this cleaner fossil fuel. But how should we use it?
Advertisement
Advertisement
Subscribe to Technology Review's daily e-mail update. Enter your e-mail address

TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES

More Technology News from Forbes

Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology © 2009 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.