A new prenatal test uses fetal DNA from a pregnant woman's blood. Scientists first separate the fetal DNA from the mother's DNA, then compare the amount of DNA from two different chromosomes. They’re looking for an extra copy of chromosome 21, which causes Down’s syndrome.
Ravgen

Biomedicine

A Simpler Test for Detecting Down's Syndrome

A new blood test uses scraps of fetal DNA to piece together a prenatal diagnosis.

  • Friday, February 2, 2007
  • By Courtney Humphries

In January, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists recommended that all pregnant women have access to Down's syndrome screening, which in the past was advised only for women age 35 and older. But prenatal tests for Down's syndrome and other genetic abnormalities can be problematic. Initial screening can be done with ultrasound or a blood test, but a definitive diagnosis requires more-invasive procedures: amniocentesis or chorionic villus sampling, both of which carry a small risk of causing miscarriage. What's more, the screening tests have a 5 percent false-positive rate, which results in many unnecessary procedures.

Now researchers at a Columbia, MD-based biotech company are reporting encouraging preliminary results using a new experimental method for detecting Down's syndrome. The blood test takes advantage of small pieces of fetal DNA floating in a pregnant woman's bloodstream. The development of the method, reported in the current issue of Lancet, is still in early stages, but this represents a first step toward a long-sought goal of a quick, safe, and effective way to perform prenatal genetic tests.

In Down's syndrome, each cell has an extra copy of chromosome 21. To detect this defect, scientists at Ravgen examined fetal-DNA fragments in the blood of pregnant women and looked for a disproportionate level of DNA from chromosome 21. In a study on 60 patients, the research group was able to identify the number of chromosomes correctly in 58 cases. Three patients carried a fetus with Down's syndrome. The test was able to detect two of the three. There was also one false positive among the 57 samples without the extra chromosome 21.

Farideh Bischoff, a molecular cytogeneticist at Baylor College of Medicine, says that the study provides "proof of concept" for the technique. "Conceptually, it all makes sense; scientifically, there's a lot of development to be done." In particular, the sensitivity and accuracy of the test must be improved before it can function as a diagnostic test, and it must be tested on a larger scale.

Advertisement

Several years ago, researchers discovered that a mother's blood contains cells from her baby, as well as fragments of fetal DNA. But Bischoff says that one of the major challenges in the field is distinguishing a mother's DNA from her baby's. Sorting through the scattered DNA fragments is like listening to a radio station playing two channels at once; the trick is to separate the two signals.

Print

Related Articles

Potential Treatment for Down Syndrome

Enhancing specific chemical signaling in the brain could help treat the disorder.

Portable DNA Purifier for Poor Countries

A new handheld device isolates DNA from human fluid without the use of electrical power.

How Down Syndrome Stops Cancer

Customized Down syndrome stem cells reveal a way to starve tumors.

Close Comments

To comment, please sign in or register

Forgot my password

Guest (ant_dunn)

  • 1836 Days Ago
  • 02/05/2007

What is the purpose of DS screening?

As one who has had 2 children with DS (neither of whom were detected prenatally), I must question the need for having such screenings.  They perpetuate the ignorant idea that there is someting dreadfully wrong with having a child with this chromosonal disability.  Of course, people with DS do have unique challenges. And yet people with this particular disability also are well-known for providing a lot of joy and love to everyone they meet.  The reality is that such screenings often scare new parents into making snap decisions about having to fix the "problem" of having a "defective" child.  Sadly, this often equates to murdering (aka aborting) a child before he or she even has a chance to grow and develop.  Carrying a child with DS (to my knowledge) does not present any imminent danger to the pregnant mother.  DS is typically diagnosed very shortly after the child is born and thus there is still plenty of time to discover and correct any physical problems that might occur (i.e. heart issues, malformed intestines, etc.).  So I must ask in all earnest, what value does such screenings provide?

Reply

Advertisement

MAGAZINE

Can We Build Tomorrow's Breakthroughs?

Manufacturing in the United States is in trouble. That's bad news not just for the country's economy but for the future of innovation.

Videos

The Virtual Nurse Will See You Now

More

Advertisement

Technology Review Lists

TR50

Our list of the 50 most innovative companies, including the following:

Claros Diagnostics

eSolar

Amyris

Complete Genomics

More

Advertisement

Facebook

Advertisement