Biomedicine

Using Stem Cells to Cure Blindness

(Page 2 of 2)

  • Tuesday, August 15, 2006
  • By Emily Singer

The researchers don't yet know if the cells can actually integrate into the complex circuitry of the eye to restore vision, but early results are promising. The transplanted cells do express many of the proteins needed to respond to light, and they make neural connections when grown in a dish with other retinal cells. However, the true test will come with Reh's current experiments: transplanting the cells into blind animals. "We should know within the next year if the cells can restore vision," says Reh.

Other groups are also developing stem cell therapies for the retina. Advanced Cell Technology (ACT), a stem cell biotechnology company based in Alameda, CA, has developed a way to turn embryonic stem cells into pigment epithelial cells, another cell type lost in macular degeneration.

When implanted into the eyes of animal models, the cells protect against further degeneration of the photoreceptors and improve vision, says Robert Lanza, vice president of research and scientific development at ACT. The company plans to file for permission from the Food and Drug Administration to start human trials of the therapy by the end of next year, he says.

Experts say that work such as Reh's and Lanza's is finally bringing hope to an area of research that has struggled for years. Scientists have had some success in transplanting retinal cells from fetuses in animal models, and a small clinical trial of this type of therapy is currently underway. "But the logistics of using fetal tissue has a lot of uncertainties and ethical issues, and there is always the danger of transmitting infective agents to the host," says Lund.

Stem cell-derived retinal cells provide a much larger and more reliable source of cells. "I think cell therapies for eye disease are really going to take off in the next few years," says Lund.

Reh and others still have a lot to work out before stem cell therapies for retinal degeneration become a reality. For example, it's not yet clear whether it's better to implant cells when they are still in a somewhat undifferentiated state, such as the progenitor cells, or whether it is better to turn the cells into photoreceptors and then transplant. Reh plans to try both.

Restoring vision could be one of the most promising early uses of stem cell therapies because scientists know exactly what cells they need to replace. "We're always reading that embryonic cells are going to cure every disease," says Lund. "But in this case, we're clearly working with the idea that embryonic stem cells will have very specific functions in eye disease."

Print

Related Articles

Two Patients Undergo Stem-Cell Blindness Treatment

A small biotech firm is the second company to start human tests of embryonic stem-cell therapy.

Patients Facing Blindness to Test Therapy with Stem Cells

Replacing certain cells in the retina could slow visual impairment for people with macular degeneration.

Training Computers to Combat Blindness

Web-connected cameras may help doctors detect a common eye disease.

Close Comments

To comment, please sign in or register

Forgot my password

Guest (Jonathan)

  • 2010 Days Ago
  • 08/15/2006

tip of the eyesberg

Sorry about the bad puns.. I think it might be genetic.  Stem cell therapies are certainly showing great promise...

Reply

Guest (Jonathan)

  • 2010 Days Ago
  • 08/15/2006

more

Once we can take any cells from a persons body and make individualized stem cells, I imagine things will really start cooking!  Great progress in this area recently from a variety of sources..
check it out:
http://www.futurepundit.com/archives/003638.html

Reply

Guest (vision)

  • 2010 Days Ago
  • 08/15/2006

promise

part of the problem is that its been PROMISING for years and very little to show for it while other sources of stem cells have direct results

Reply

Guest (jonathan)

  • 2010 Days Ago
  • 08/15/2006

results

Yes, we have seen the promise of creating undifferentiated stem cells from adult cells for years, but only just recently have scientists uncovered the biochemical processes that make it possible.  As far as I know, it is so new, human trials have only just begun.

Reply

gurby1

2 Comments

  • 2003 Days Ago
  • 08/22/2006

Re: tip of the eyesberg

I am interested to know how a blind mouse will be able to tell the researchers whether it can see with the new cells?

Reply

Guest (Jerry)

  • 2010 Days Ago
  • 08/15/2006

the President's blind eye

The multi-year delay in the progress of this science due to the President's blind eye and our congress's inability to agree to override is so unfortunate. . . .

Reply

Guest (kruelhunter)

  • 2010 Days Ago
  • 08/15/2006

Blindness to reality

Why do so many continue to claim that the President has banned embryonic stem cell research?  And then they compound their error by pretending that only taxpayer funding can result in useful outcomes.  If, as claimed by taxpayer funded researchers, embryonic stem cells are some sort of magic bullet don't they realize that private investors would flood the research facilities with all the funding they could use in hopes of big profits?  Or is it that they find the idea of non government sponsored profit is somehow sinful?  Or perhaps they like the idea of paying for the research that will make others rich so that they can then demand that government regulate yet another aspect of our lives?

Reply

Advertisement

Guest (Keith)

  • 2010 Days Ago
  • 08/15/2006

stem cells

While stem cell research shows many promising new therapies that may relieve human suffering, research requiring the destruction of a developing human to harvest stem cells is frankensteinish. While i applaud research that focuses on transforming a potential patent's cell into a stem cells.

please note that the US federal ban on federal funding of fetal stem cell research does not place a ban on adult stem cell research.

Reply

Guest (Chris)

  • 2010 Days Ago
  • 08/15/2006

soul searching

I agree that growing embyos for the sole purpose of medical research is not ethical.  However, if there is a ready supply of unwanted embyos, why not put them to some good use instead of flushing them down the toilet?  Is the embryo any less destroyed?  Of course, I am referring to the thousands of unneeded embryos created from IVF treatments.

I have RP, and my wife and I also have frozen embryos from a successful IVF procedure.  I would like to be able to designate an embryo or two for research but all I can legally do is tell the Medical Center to throw them away.  What a waste of potential.

Reply

Guest (jonathan)

  • 2010 Days Ago
  • 08/15/2006

agreed

It is a terrible waste to throw away all of that potential for research that is right in front of us.  Why, do you suppose, we dont see a big fuss about IVF? People who are opposed to the destruction of fertilized cells should be adamently opposed to IVF.  I
imagine that the difference is that  stem cell research is a newer technology that people arent accustomed to yet, as IVF has been around for many years.  It is common to see this kind of reaction against new technology.  We have seen it before in the past and we will see it many times in the future.

Reply

Guest (Brian)

  • 2010 Days Ago
  • 08/15/2006

IVF Opposition

there is opposition to IVF, but try to get any coverage of it. The deliberate production of "excess" embryoes has been a moral concern from the beginning. but objectors are conveniently written off as heartless, religious nuts.

Reply

shomas

246 Comments

  • 2008 Days Ago
  • 08/17/2006

Re: soul searching

Production of excess embryos is an ethical problem with IVF of its own that shouldn't be compounded with harvesting stem cells from the embryos.
When it comes down to it the big reasons for stem cell research is to use the technology to treat patents. Using a patent's own cells to make stem cells for treatments that use stem cells avoids tissue type matching as well as the ethics of destroying developing humans for research's name sake. if a society is to allow embryos to be grown for research how much of a stretch is it to let them grow an additional week, month, or years and harvest organs from clones.

Reply

shomas

246 Comments

  • 2008 Days Ago
  • 08/17/2006

Re: soul searching

As long as a society continues to treat fetuses as property and not human life with intrinsic rights then we are doomed to go down a path of continued devaluation of human life at all stages of development from fetus to grave. you might even find proponents that would support turning prison inmates into organ donors. HAY judge, we need more organs type B- blood type preferred.

Reply

Guest (Auburn13)

  • 1995 Days Ago
  • 08/30/2006

Re: soul searching

I am appalled at the indescribably stupid lack of compassion by a phoney compassionate conservative in denying the assistance of government scientists in the pursuit of alleviating human suffering by such afflictions as Maclar Degeneration by use of stem cells which are going to be destroyed anyway.

MY FRIENDS -WAKE UP!!!

Reply

Advertisement

Guest (kruelhunter)

  • 2010 Days Ago
  • 08/15/2006

Embryonic stem cells

Yet another magic bullet that can be supplied only by killing the yet-to-be-born.

Reply

xuxak2007

1 Comment

  • 1051 Days Ago
  • 03/31/2009

Re: Embryonic stem cells

Both my father and boyfriend suffer from eye diseases! My father has macular degeneration and my boyfriend has retinitis pigmentosa! If using embryos could cure them of these cruel diseases, then I am alllll for it! Embryos that would otherwise be thrown away could be of sight giving use! If I were a discardrd embryo, I'd be much happier knowing I was saving someone's eyesight, than just being thrown away and not being of any use at all! Life can give life!

Reply

Advertisement

MAGAZINE

Can We Build Tomorrow's Breakthroughs?

Manufacturing in the United States is in trouble. That's bad news not just for the country's economy but for the future of innovation.

Videos

The Virtual Nurse Will See You Now

More

Advertisement

Technology Review Lists

TR50

Our list of the 50 most innovative companies, including the following:

1366 Technologies

BrightSource Energy

Calxeda

A123 Systems

More

Advertisement

Facebook

Advertisement