Biomedicine

Stem Cell Mix Helps Paralyzed Rats Walk

(Page 2 of 2)

  • Monday, June 26, 2006
  • By Emily Singer

In order to get the newly sprouted axons to span the lengthy gap from the spinal cord to the muscle, the researchers injected neural stem cells, which produce a nerve growth stimulator called GDNF. When delivered to the target muscles, the GDNF acted as a powerful attractor to the growing motor neurons, allowing them to grow toward the muscle, and, most importantly, to make functional neuromuscular connections. The final result: the disrupted neural circuit is reconnected, allowing the brain to send messages to the muscle.

According to the new findings, 11 out of 15 mice that received the full battery of treatments regained some motor function, moving around their cages more easily. For example, in one mouse with roughly 4,100 new motor neurons transplanted to its spinal cord, the nerve fibers of approximately 200 of those neurons exited the spinal cord, and 120 of those reached the skeletal muscle, forming typical neuromuscular connections.

In addition, Kerr and team discovered that the mice needed every element of the regimen for the best recovery. In mice who received only a subset of treatments, neurons either died or did not reach their target, and the mice showed little improvement in movement. The findings were published today in the Annals of Neurology.

"Getting neurons to be functional is a big plus and an exciting step forward," says Stephen M. Strittmatter, a neuroscientist at Yale University School of Medicine, who has done seminal work uncovering the inhibitory forces at work in the spinal cord.

Most previous research in spinal-cord damage has focused on encouraging existing neurons to grow and form new connections with the spinal cord or on giving surviving neurons new insulation, which is often damaged in spinal injury, preventing neural signals from being transmitted. Such results have important applications for many types of spinal-cord injury, where motor neurons still function but must be reconnected to the cord.

Kerr's experiments tackled a different problem, using embryonic stem cells to create an entirely new connection between the spinal cord and muscle. In addition to ALS, the findings present a potential avenue of treatment for spinal muscular atrophy, a degenerative disease that can be fatal in infants, as well as some types of multiple sclerosis and spinal-cord injury, which all show loss of motor neurons. Kerr's regimen could ultimately be combined with other treatments, such as cell transplants to replace myelin sheaths. "Used in combination, these techniques could really have promise for people with complex spinal-cord injuries," says Michael Fehlings, a neuroscientist and neurosurgeon at the University of Toronto.

In fact, scientists say variations of the technique could ultimately have applications for a wide range of neurological disorders, including Parkinson's disease. "We've figured out a boilerplate recipe for how to reconnect disconnected cell populations," says Kerr.

The team is now planning similar tests in pigs. Studies in larger animals are necessary to make sure that the new neurons can grow the lengths needed for the treatment to work in humans. If those experiments are successful, says Kerr, human clinical trials could occur within five years.

But clinical testing is likely to be a feat in itself. "This is a very complicated strategy, and it's going to be challenging to translate that into clinical trials," says Mary Bunge, a spinal-cord expert who works at the Miami project to cure paralysis at the University of Miami. "But they got good results and maybe that'll give us new ideas to test."

More in Biomedicine

Zapping Migraines

Read More »
Print

Related Articles

Cell Type Counts in Spinal Therapy

Rats regain motor skills with one kind of cell transplant, get nerve pain with another.

Close Comments

To comment, please sign in or register

Forgot my password

Guest (curious)

  • 2057 Days Ago
  • 06/28/2006

five years??

why wait, if there are people who's eager, to try and wanted to know if this thing really work.
it's also probabaly best to find out what are the bad effects now, rather than to find out later. That will be kind a late and we just created another problem.

Reply

Guest (Nic)

  • 2056 Days Ago
  • 06/29/2006

Rushing yeilds Complication.

To rush into such action would be unfair to the patient. Problems that take place early in trials can often be corrected. Corrected meaning on another "lab rat". With a human life care is needed and clinical studies should only be performed once tests on other species have been perfected.

Reply

brainandspinalcord

9 Comments

  • 1272 Days Ago
  • 08/21/2008

I think that in the time since this article was posted, we have seen exactly "why wait" on human trials. With this type of procedure now being done on humans in China (and other countries) with shaky results at best, it's easy to see how dangerous it is to jump in too quickly.

Reply

Advertisement

MAGAZINE

Can We Build Tomorrow's Breakthroughs?

Manufacturing in the United States is in trouble. That's bad news not just for the country's economy but for the future of innovation.

Videos

The Virtual Nurse Will See You Now

More

Advertisement

Technology Review Lists

TR50

Our list of the 50 most innovative companies, including the following:

IBM

Life Technologies

iRobot

Amazon.com

More

Advertisement

Facebook

Advertisement