Human Study Shows Benefits of Caloric RestrictionContinued from page 1
TR: So how do they measure up? JH: Caloric restriction has greater benefits than exercising, especially on blood pressure and inflammation. TR: Now you are planning a new trial of caloric restriction? JH: Yes. The CRONies study was just a cross-section. We don't know what these people were like before they started caloric restriction. In the new study, we will recruit people who are normal to slightly overweight. We'll ask them to eat 25 percent less than they ate before. The idea is to have people do this for two years, but that will be very difficult. TR: What do you hope to show? JH: At the end of two years, will these people have undergone the same biological changes as rats and mice on caloric restriction? We won't be able to say they will live longer, but at least we'll be able to see if the same underlying changes are taking place. We'll also be able to determine the maximal level of caloric restriction. For all we know, CRONies are overdoing it. Maybe you can get the same benefits with a smaller decrease in calories. TR: One question in aging research is whether scientists can design drugs that mimic the health effects of caloric restriction (see "The Fountain of Health"). Will these studies help that goal? JH: It will give us information on the types of biomarkers we should be looking for. If a mimetic causes the same biological changes, we can say they're working like caloric restriction. |
Caloric Restriction Slows Aging in Monkeys
07/09/2009









Comments
06/06/2006
Posts:1
My brother in law just lost eighty pounds during a lung infection complicated by a pocket of asbestos that had to be removed surgically. His doctor said he would have died without the reserve fat. He was not an obese person by normal standards.
06/06/2006
Posts:1
06/07/2006
Posts:1
06/06/2006
Posts:1
06/07/2006
Posts:1
This is why such aerobic exercise is both age-fighting and aging. It improves muscle tone, cardiovascular fitness, etc. At the same time, however, the burning of so many calories is a source of the oxidization which CRON seeks to avoid.
The CRONies are quick to point out that consuming more calories but burning them off through an active lifestyle does not equate to calorie restriction.
06/07/2006
Posts:1
06/06/2006
Posts:1
06/06/2006
Posts:1
06/07/2006
Posts:1
As for being miserable???? You guys are NUTS!!! How about being miserable from diabetes and all its complications...and from all the other life style diseases, as well.
As for mental capacity? Look around, and you'll see a statistical trend - obesity is inversely proportional to IQ.
I haven't seen a dumb skinny person, ever.
06/07/2006
Posts:1
06/08/2006
Posts:1
06/08/2006
Posts:1
06/20/2006
Posts:1
06/06/2006
Posts:1
06/07/2006
Posts:1
06/06/2006
Posts:1
06/07/2006
Posts:1
06/07/2006
Posts:1
06/07/2006
Posts:1
06/07/2006
Posts:1
06/07/2006
Posts:1
06/08/2006
Posts:1
06/08/2006
Posts:1
06/07/2006
Posts:1
Instead of simply reducing calories, I think it's more important for someone to find their target calorie intake.
06/07/2006
Posts:1
06/07/2006
Posts:1
I think the main conclusion of the study is that a calorie-focused diet is very healthy, which i totally agree with. Most of us (Americans) probably have a target intake that's lower than our normal diet. But a "calorie-restricted" rather than "calorie-focused" label might give the false impression that the less you eat, the healthier you are.
06/07/2006
Posts:1
06/08/2006
Posts:1
06/11/2006
Posts:1
I do not tip anyway but stay in the middle.
06/14/2006
Posts:1
Stay healthy all of you, love life and one another.
boston02129
05/11/2007
Posts:1