Human Study Shows Benefits of Caloric RestrictionThose on calorie-restricted diets are less prone to heart disease and diabetes, says Washington U. researcher John Holloszy.
There is ample evidence that a severe low-calorie diet can increase longevity in a number of animals, including flies and rodents. But does it work in humans? Scientists at Washington University in St. Louis are hoping to answer that question by studying a group of people -- 35 members of the Calorie Restriction Society -- who eat around 1,800 calories a day in an effort to improve their health and extend lifespan.
It will be years before the study, which began four years ago, determines how the diet affects lifespan. But John Holloszy and his collaborator Luigi Fontana have already found that those following such a calorie-restricted diet -- they call themselves "CRONies" (Caloric Restriction with Optimal Nutrition) -- are protected against some diseases associated with aging, such as cardiovascular disease and Type 2 diabetes. The researchers are now planning a larger trial, in which people eating an average diet will reduce their caloric intake by 25 percent, to determine how caloric restriction leads to biological changes over time. Holloszy talked with Technology Review about his current findings at the 35th annual meeting of the American Aging Association in Boston this week. Technology Review: What's the most striking finding you've seen in those following a calorie-restricted diet so far? John Holloszy: They are powerfully protected against the diseases of old age, such as heart disease. They have low levels of cholesterol and triglycerides and extremely low blood pressure -- similar to a young child, around 100/60. As a result of the low blood pressure, they have less strain on the arteries, which are much more elastic than usual for people of their age. Their hearts resemble the heart of a person 17 years younger. They also have very good insulin sensitivity, so they are not going to get Type 2 diabetes. TR: What about their levels of inflammation? That is another factor that's been the focus of a lot of aging research in the last few years. JH: As we get older, we get an increasing amount of inflammation, which is probably a very important part of the aging process. CRONies have very low levels of inflammation. C reactive protein, for example, is a marker and cause of inflammation. An average value for a middle-age person is about 2.5; but CRONies have levels of 0.2. It's just amazing. TR: So are these people going to live longer? JH: Caloric restriction definitely does slow secondary aging, which is linked to lifestyle and disease. Smoking, for example, causes secondary aging of the lungs and skin. It's impossible to say if they'll increase their maximum lifespan. But I'm sure they'll live longer than they would if they didn't do caloric restriction. TR: You also compared them to a group of runners to see how caloric restriction measures up to exercise. JH: Yes. We studied a group of master athletes, who are the thinnest group of people eating regular diets that we could find. They were very lean, but not as thin as the CRONies. It's hard to find anyone that thin, unless they're sick.
|
Caloric Restriction Slows Aging in Monkeys
07/09/2009










Comments
06/06/2006
Posts:1
My brother in law just lost eighty pounds during a lung infection complicated by a pocket of asbestos that had to be removed surgically. His doctor said he would have died without the reserve fat. He was not an obese person by normal standards.
06/06/2006
Posts:1
06/07/2006
Posts:1
06/06/2006
Posts:1
06/07/2006
Posts:1
This is why such aerobic exercise is both age-fighting and aging. It improves muscle tone, cardiovascular fitness, etc. At the same time, however, the burning of so many calories is a source of the oxidization which CRON seeks to avoid.
The CRONies are quick to point out that consuming more calories but burning them off through an active lifestyle does not equate to calorie restriction.
06/07/2006
Posts:1
06/06/2006
Posts:1
06/06/2006
Posts:1
06/07/2006
Posts:1
As for being miserable???? You guys are NUTS!!! How about being miserable from diabetes and all its complications...and from all the other life style diseases, as well.
As for mental capacity? Look around, and you'll see a statistical trend - obesity is inversely proportional to IQ.
I haven't seen a dumb skinny person, ever.
06/07/2006
Posts:1
06/08/2006
Posts:1
06/08/2006
Posts:1
06/20/2006
Posts:1
06/06/2006
Posts:1
06/07/2006
Posts:1
06/06/2006
Posts:1
06/07/2006
Posts:1
06/07/2006
Posts:1
06/07/2006
Posts:1
06/07/2006
Posts:1
06/07/2006
Posts:1
06/08/2006
Posts:1
06/08/2006
Posts:1
06/07/2006
Posts:1
Instead of simply reducing calories, I think it's more important for someone to find their target calorie intake.
06/07/2006
Posts:1
06/07/2006
Posts:1
I think the main conclusion of the study is that a calorie-focused diet is very healthy, which i totally agree with. Most of us (Americans) probably have a target intake that's lower than our normal diet. But a "calorie-restricted" rather than "calorie-focused" label might give the false impression that the less you eat, the healthier you are.
06/07/2006
Posts:1
06/08/2006
Posts:1
06/11/2006
Posts:1
I do not tip anyway but stay in the middle.
06/14/2006
Posts:1
Stay healthy all of you, love life and one another.
boston02129
05/11/2007
Posts:1