The findings could help in the understanding of how people make decisions. Many choices involve a waiting period -- playing the stock market, for example, often requires waiting years to get returns. Yet most economic models don't take into account that waiting has its own costs and benefits -- such as the dread sometimes felt waiting for something bad to occur or the eagerness in waiting for a happy event. "The current study shows that anticipation itself becomes part of the consumption pattern," says Kevin McCabe, a neuroscientist and economist at George Mason University in Fairfax, VA. "I think if [the findings] hold up, it basically does imply different policies for dealing with losses than the way standard economics models would approach them."
The findings might also help to explain seemingly odd decisions, such as why some people overeat or use addictive drugs, which they know are harmful in the long run. "These findings emphasize the role of immediate emotions rather than abstract trade-offs," says George Lowenstein, an economist and psychologist at Carnegie Mellon University. While scientists aren't yet sure why some people are more likely to overeat or become addicted to drugs, one theory is that they value short-term pleasure over long-term health. But the new study suggests these people may instead be trying to avoid the unpleasantness of waiting, says Lowenstein. "If someone is overeating, it's not that they don't care about being obese. They find it very uncomfortable in the here and now to desist from eating."
Berns and colleagues are now studying different aspects of decision-making, such as how adolescents make choices when faced with rewards and how adults do so when negative consequences are uncertain. Berns points out that the recruiting process for the experiment may have screened out certain types of people, though, such as super-extreme dreaders. "When we told people on the phone that the experiment would involve shocks, many dropped out right then," he says.
McCabe says it would be interesting to see how people with phobias, such as fear of flying or heights, react to dread. "These people do try to avoid the circumstances as long as possible," says McCabe. "It would be interesting to see how this normal circuitry is different in those people's brains."
Comments
05/18/2006
Posts:1
Why make these distinctions between everyday language and (for want of a better term) scientific language?
Example: 1) You are going to the dentist for a root canal. You share with your friend that you are dreading the experience. Your friend pats you on the back and reassures you and you feel better. 2) You are part of a research study for a pharmaceutical firm. They have developed one medication to reduce fear and one to reduce dread. To determine the best medication for your situation, the researchers need to know, not your subjective description, but the brain activity to which the medication will be targeted.
I hope my reply is helpful.
Libby Wilder
Libbywilder
05/10/2009
Posts:2
i'm wondering if, as the subjects were waiting for the electrical shock, they were reliving a past event in which they were painfully shocked, in which case the same pain receptors would be activated.
05/18/2006
Posts:1
05/19/2006
Posts:1
06/02/2006
Posts:1
What about this: overeating, drug using, smoking and other such behaviors are a way to defend against dread: the dread of being hungry, the dread of mental, emotional, or existential pain; the dread of the physical and mental effects of withdrawal.
From this perspective, a treatment approach could be modeled around established cognitive-behavioral techniques to reduce attention to the anticipated negative experience. In addition, if the dread indeed mimics the actual experience, then, for instance, the overeater is not just forestalling the feeling of hunger, he or she is actually alleviating the feeling of hunger generated not by actual experience, but by dread.
Libbywilder
05/06/2009
Posts:2