Biomedicine

Big Brain Thinking

(Page 3 of 3)

  • Monday, February 13, 2006
  • By Emily Singer

TR: So how do you plan to understand the link between activity in specific parts of the brain and consciousness?

BN: I don't now how to figure it out, but it seems to me that stimulating a human brain such as my own would be a good place to start. If I could stimulate my MT, then, presumably I would know and could say whether I really see the [actual] dots moving [as in the monkey experiments] or something else altogether. This would be a start toward identifying the [specific aspects of consciousness that accompany] neural activation at different points in the nervous system.

TR: Do you think you could really get regulatory approval? What are the major ethical issues?

BN: Getting approval to do something like this would be difficult. Any human experiments in this country are under rigorous scrutiny. Lawyers and administrators at institutions take a dim view of this kind of thing because of the liability issues. And there is a definite slippery slope argument. I might be able to make a case for my own experiment, but it could set precedent for others for whom it would be more risky.

For example, if I did this experiment, it would probably be a big deal and get in the newspapers. Some young graduate student might see it as a way to get ahead in his career and decide to do it. He might put himself at greater risk than I would. Maybe he would probe deeper into his brain, where there is more risk of damaging the vasculature. It would be uncomfortable to think that I was responsible in part for that, even if my own adventure turned out just fine.

TR: Do you really want to do this?

BN: Well, I've thought about it very carefully. I've talked to neurosurgeons, both in the United States and outside the country where the regulatory environment is less strict, about how practical and risky it is. If the risk of serious postsurgical complications was one in one hundred, I wouldn't do it. If it was one in one thousand, I would seriously consider doing it. To my chagrin, most surgeons estimate the risk to be somewhere in between my benchmarks.

Print

Related Articles

Tryptophan, Turkey and Trust

Your holiday turkey won't give you more faith in your family, but research published last year suggests that there is a relationship between tryptophan and trust.

Training Attention

New brain-imaging techniques could teach people to strengthen the parts of the brain that control attention.

Jeff Hawkins Q&A

The father of mobile computing discusses artificial intelligence and how our brains work with the editor in chief of Technology Review.

Close Comments

To comment, please sign in or register

Forgot my password

Guest (Bruce Cox)

  • 2193 Days Ago
  • 02/13/2006

Emergency

Try this: consciousness does not emerge from brain activity; brain activity emerges from consciousness.  An experiment such as the one described will likely produce ambiguous results, or will confirm the null hypothesis, depending on the bias of the experimenter/subject.  Separating the experimenter from the subject has its value, which should be more than enough reason to not do as described, quite apart from the risk of brain damage.

Reply

Guest (Hal Seyle)

  • 2192 Days Ago
  • 02/14/2006

Big Brain Thinking

Can't trans cranial magnetic stimulation induce current in specific neurons?

Reply

Guest (A)

  • 2191 Days Ago
  • 02/15/2006

TMS is not specific enough

TMS is not very localized, e.g. you can induce large temporary lesions
in visual cortex but not more.

Reply

Guest (John Hatten)

  • 2192 Days Ago
  • 02/14/2006

Big Brain Thinking

I think that consciousness emerges from brain activity AND brain activity arises from consciousness.

I would love to be part of this research. I am very involved in learning about the brain since my TBI (Traumatic Brain Injury) in 1973. I've come back further than just about anyone I've known with TBI (and as a Case Manager for a TBI research project and now as a vocational rehabilitation counselor who presently works with several people with TBI, I've met hundreds)

Reply

Guest (travis mattera)

  • 2191 Days Ago
  • 02/15/2006

overlay and filter

I do agree that physical brain activity is directed by our consciousness, but it is also quite true that physical conditions, let alone stimulus, can have quite an effect on consciousness.  What will be the true scientific problem is how to rigorously formulate experiments and extract data.  Time to get creative!

Reply

Guest (Mike)

  • 2191 Days Ago
  • 02/15/2006

Consciousness before brain activity?

How could this be?
We can easily show that brain activity effects consciousness, but not the other way around.

Reply

Guest (MrMosis)

  • 2191 Days Ago
  • 02/15/2006

A thought

Not that I know anything about a human MT beyond what is said in the interview, but suppose his realization that and experience of his MT being stimulated causes his MT to explode.

Brain activity being altered will have had an effect on coinscious activity, which subsequently had an adverse effect on brain activity. (which would then no doubt cause a serious counscious/personality shift and Bill Newsome would embark on a career change and become an artist.)

Reply

Advertisement

Guest (Ben Shumway)

  • 2191 Days Ago
  • 02/15/2006

Consciousness?

Consciousness?  These people talk about it like it was some scientific fact.  What is consciousness??  How can you be searching for something when you don't know what "it" even is?  Decisions?  Who says we make decisions?  From instinct (emotion), you want to do one thing more than the other.  So, decisions and consciousness is simply the brain's ability to say "food is more important than being comfy", etc.  Why are people trying to overcomplicate things?  There is no ghost in the machine.

Reply

Guest (/e)

  • 2191 Days Ago
  • 02/15/2006

Could be.

You can't rule it out either.

Reply

Guest (Mannan)

  • 2190 Days Ago
  • 02/16/2006

can't rule out

You can't rule it outtttttttt.
http://maair.net
http://mannan.zabvision.edu.pk

Reply

Guest (Gard)

  • 2191 Days Ago
  • 02/15/2006

Outside our realm

The problem with studying consciousness, is that it is our own consciousness that tries to study it. Now try to grab your right arm with your right arm.

Reply

Guest (Derlin)

  • 2190 Days Ago
  • 02/16/2006

The simplest plausible solution

Aren't we looking for the level of abstraction from stimulus to activity to consciousness? I don't believe they are separable but this kind of research may determine boundaries and even lead to breakthroughs in priorities. For example, the heartbeat is more important than breathing, breathing is more important than stopping bleeding and so on. It may be that shocking a brain will kill a person but a carefully applied stimulus may cause critical activity which could lead to the resumption of conscious thought. At least, that is how it would work in science fiction and is what shock paddles do with the heart.

Reply

Guest (eranimos)

  • 2115 Days Ago
  • 05/02/2006

consciousness

conscsiosness is awareness of our own thought ,ablity ,behaviour .

Reply

Guest

  • 2046 Days Ago
  • 07/10/2006

Also your bearings/whereabouts

Reply

Advertisement

Guest (Gurbachan Singh)

  • 2121 Days Ago
  • 04/26/2006

Why Not - Encouraged to read on Kant

How does an artist or philosopher creates art or notions completely original. We need to visit Kant and Clausewitz on coup de oeil or intution. A simple article is at chap 3 of the following link
http://www.maxwell.af.mil/au/aul/aupress/SAAS_Theses/SAASS_Out/Pellegrini/pellegrini.pdf

Cheers


Reply

Guest (Sandi)

  • 2186 Days Ago
  • 02/20/2006

The stimulis is simply artificial data in

By stimulating the MT he is only inputing false data to be interpreted by the consciousness. And to begin with he doesn't even know what data he inputs until his consciousness responds to it.

I fail to see what he can learn beyond the effects of normal sensory input, except that he has fooled his consciousness with false data.

Reply

Guest (Evan)

  • 2185 Days Ago
  • 02/21/2006

Not just simulated stimulus

The part of this that could shed some light on consciousness is the fact that it is not just simulating stimulus.  By bypassing certain parts of the normal flow of optical information you can start to see what parts of the brain contribute to conscious thought as opposed to unconcscious calculations.

Reply

Guest (Nate)

  • 2134 Days Ago
  • 04/13/2006

interpreting false data is the whole point

We can speculate that the  stimulation of the monkey MT does things to the monkey because of the monkeys response. 

you can stimulate a monkey all day long, but at the end of the day the monkey's response is still just oooohhh aahha ahhh oohh.

This guy will be able to describe the experience (assuming he doesn't accidentally damage his brain too much) of having his MT? stimulated.

He knows the data is false, but will be able to still experience the sensation of the stimulation and describe with great detail what occurred.

I think the fooling of the consciousness with false data is the whole point

Reply

Guest (chydgv)

  • 2170 Days Ago
  • 03/08/2006

math

hi fatty

Reply

Advertisement

MAGAZINE

Can We Build Tomorrow's Breakthroughs?

Manufacturing in the United States is in trouble. That's bad news not just for the country's economy but for the future of innovation.

Videos

The Virtual Nurse Will See You Now

More

Advertisement

Technology Review Lists

TR50

Our list of the 50 most innovative companies, including the following:

Lattice Power

Novartis

BrightSource Energy

American Superconductor

More

Advertisement

Facebook

Advertisement