Big Brain ThinkingStanford neuroscientist Bill Newsome wants to implant an electrode in his brain to better understand human consciousness.
Scientists are learning volumes about the brain -- how it can make split-second decisions, how it learns from past mistakes, how it converts pulses of light into a complex visual scene. But, for some, deciphering the "language" of the electrical pulses that travel through our brains is only half the story. The second part, and one that is far more philosophical and complex, is how that brain activity translates into consciousness -- a person's self-awareness and perception of the world around them. Bill Newsome, a neuroscientist at Stanford University in Palo Alto, CA, has spent the last twenty years studying how neurons encode information and how they use it to make decisions about the world. In the 1990s, he and collaborators were able to change the way a monkey responded to its environment by sending electric jolts to certain parts of its brain. The findings gave neuroscientists enormous insight into the inner workings of the brain. But Newsome is obsessed with a lingering question: How does consciousness arise from brain function? He feels the best way to answer that question is by implanting an electrode into his own brain -- and seeing how the electric current changes his perception of the world. Newsome would not be the first person with a brain implant. Epilepsy patients undergo electrical stimulation prior to brain surgery. A paralyzed man in New England has an experimental implant that translates his brain activity into movements of a robotic arm. And, perhaps most famously, Kevin Warwick, a cybernetics professor at the University of Reading, U.K., first implanted a chip into nerve fibers in his arm in 2002, then implanted a chip in his wife's arm, as part of his quest to become a cyborg. It's not certain that Newsome will get approval for such a radical undertaking. But, if he does, his experiment won't be in the interest of curing a disease or become a human machine. He's hoping to do something broader: understand consciousness. Technology Review: Why is understanding consciousness so important to you? Bill Newsome: I think that how consciousness arises out of brain function is one of the most fascinating and important questions in all of neurobiology. If we understand the system completely (from input to output) at a cellular level, but still do not know exactly what causes conscious mental phenomena, we will have failed.
|
Tryptophan, Turkey and Trust
11/21/2007









Comments
02/13/2006
Posts:1
02/14/2006
Posts:1
in visual cortex but not more.
02/15/2006
Posts:1
I would love to be part of this research. I am very involved in learning about the brain since my TBI (Traumatic Brain Injury) in 1973. I've come back further than just about anyone I've known with TBI (and as a Case Manager for a TBI research project and now as a vocational rehabilitation counselor who presently works with several people with TBI, I've met hundreds)
02/14/2006
Posts:1
02/15/2006
Posts:1
We can easily show that brain activity effects consciousness, but not the other way around.
02/15/2006
Posts:1
Brain activity being altered will have had an effect on coinscious activity, which subsequently had an adverse effect on brain activity. (which would then no doubt cause a serious counscious/personality shift and Bill Newsome would embark on a career change and become an artist.)
02/15/2006
Posts:1
02/15/2006
Posts:1
02/15/2006
Posts:1
http://maair.net
http://mannan.zabvision.edu.pk
02/16/2006
Posts:1
02/15/2006
Posts:1
02/16/2006
Posts:1
05/02/2006
Posts:1
07/10/2006
Posts:1
http://www.maxwell.af.mil/au/aul/aupress/SAAS_Theses/SAASS_Out/Pellegrini/pellegrini.pdf
Cheers
04/26/2006
Posts:1
I fail to see what he can learn beyond the effects of normal sensory input, except that he has fooled his consciousness with false data.
02/20/2006
Posts:1
02/21/2006
Posts:1
you can stimulate a monkey all day long, but at the end of the day the monkey's response is still just oooohhh aahha ahhh oohh.
This guy will be able to describe the experience (assuming he doesn't accidentally damage his brain too much) of having his MT? stimulated.
He knows the data is false, but will be able to still experience the sensation of the stimulation and describe with great detail what occurred.
I think the fooling of the consciousness with false data is the whole point
04/13/2006
Posts:1
03/08/2006
Posts:1