Biomedicine

The Diagnostic Dilemma

(Page 2 of 2)

  • Tuesday, January 10, 2006
  • By Emily Singer

Rosenkrans says he worries about the impact of oversimplifying the interpretation of genetic diagnostic tests. For example, Medicare Australia, a government organization that subsidizes health costs for Australians, requires evidence that a lung cancer patient has the EGFR mutation for them to subsidize the drug. "That’s an example of a health authority using diagnostics in an inappropriate way," says Rosenkrans.

What's more, dealing with the complexity of diagnostic tests will become an even bigger issues as the tests become more sophisticated. The EGFR test is relatively simple, for example, detecting a mutation in a single gene. Future diagnostic tests will likely rely on multiple factors, to predict the best treatment or to give a partial prediction of how a patient will react to a drug (see "Heading off Heart Attacks").

According to Brian Spear, director for genomic and proteomic technologies at Abbott Laboratories in North Chicago, IL, the pharmacogenomics community needs to figure out how to deal with the complexity of genomic data in the clinic. "Should we be faithful to the truth, which can be very complicated and difficult to implement?" he asks. "Or should we smooth out the edges to a place where people can use it?...I don’t know the answer, but it’s a choice we’ll have to make."

Lawrence Lesko, director of the FDA's office of clinical pharmacology and biopharmaceutics, says doctors using these tools should weigh the results of genetic tests with other risk factors, such as weight and age. "I see diagnostics as an adjunct to therapy," says Lesko. "People talk about responders and nonresponders, but I think we’re really talking about a spectrum of probability."

Test makers, meanwhile, are working on educating doctors about their diagnostic tests. Swiss drug-maker Roche is launching an educational campaign to teach physicians about a new test, approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in January 2005, which predicts how people will metabolize many popular drugs, including antidepressants, pain medications, and beta-blockers. The test has only recently been distributed to clinical laboratories that process these tests for physicians -- so it's too soon to say how it will fare in clinical practice.

Print

Related Articles

Gene-Testing Machine for Doctors

A new device rapidly analyzes blood for medically relevant genetic variations.

Gene Tests That Help People Quit Smoking

A genetic variation may determine who needs a drug to help them kick the habit.

Heading Off Heart Attacks

A potential genetic test for cardiovascular risk shows how "pharmacogenomics" is coming into its own.

Close Comments

To comment, please sign in or register

Forgot my password

Guest (gentest)

  • 2227 Days Ago
  • 01/10/2006

Sources for more detailed information

This is a nice overview--are there other articles or sources that go into molecular diagnostics in more depth in particular therapeutic areas like cardiovascular or CNS?

Reply

Advertisement

MAGAZINE

Can We Build Tomorrow's Breakthroughs?

Manufacturing in the United States is in trouble. That's bad news not just for the country's economy but for the future of innovation.

Videos

The Virtual Nurse Will See You Now

More

Advertisement

Technology Review Lists

TR50

Our list of the 50 most innovative companies, including the following:

HTC

1366 Technologies

Netflix

Novomer

More

Advertisement

Facebook

Advertisement