Select your localized edition:

Close ×

More Ways to Connect

Discover one of our 28 local entrepreneurial communities »

Be the first to know as we launch in new countries and markets around the globe.

Interested in bringing MIT Technology Review to your local market?

MIT Technology ReviewMIT Technology Review - logo


Unsupported browser: Your browser does not meet modern web standards. See how it scores »

{ action.text }

Much of Sass’s time these days is spent learning how the technology can be used to teach and investigate architecture as an art. Students who take one of his special design courses are given projects such as creating innovative replacements for Boston’s tallest structure, the John Hancock Tower. The buildings they concoct often twist and turn in curvy shapes that don’t lend themselves to the Lego mentality that seems to pervade modern architecture. But rapid-prototyping technology can also teach of the past. Sass works with graduate students to make models from centuries-old sketches by some of the world’s finest designers, such as the Renaissance architect Andrea Palladio. The models turn out to be object lessons in both the brilliance and the weaknesses of the early designers.

In September, some of this work will become part of an exhibition at the MIT Museum devoted to an architectural drawing attributed to Baldassare Peruzzi, a Sienese contemporary of Michelangelo. The exhibition will feature, among other things, three-dimensional models based on the 16th-century perspective rendering. The models will help Gary Van Zante, curator of the museum’s architecture and design collection, and other historians determine if Peruzzi really was the architect and whether the drawing is of an unknown building or a play’s set design, or whether it’s simply a study piece.

Sass envisions rapid prototyping’s slow evolution from a valuable historical tool to an eventual replacement of the blueprint-based relationship between designers and contractors. At first, he believes, the technique will merely be a design aid for architects. But as robotic machinery appears on more construction sites, computer models will directly drive the building process. In a few decades, Sass predicts, homes could be entirely manufactured by robots taking instructions from a central computing source, relegating contractors to a supervisory role. When that happens, Sass says, a traditional ranch-style home, which takes at least four months to build now, will take one month.

The idea may seem far fetched, especially given the unpredictability of construction projects. But robots are already working on sites in crowded areas of Japan, where manual labor is in short supply and very expensive. Though still requiring some human guidance, these robots perform tasks such as installing windows and help make the construction process safer, cheaper, and faster. With each passing year, building becomes more automated, as better computer algorithms take more construction- site variables into account. “Crowded cities in Japan aren’t places where slow and dangerous construction can take place,” says Han Hoang, one of Sass’s graduate students. “So these types of situations are where ideas like Larry’s will come into play best. But that doesn’t mean they won’t spread.” Hoang’s own desk is covered with components of the type of robotic arms you can buy as toy-store science experiments. He’s tinkering with ideas for wheeled robots that would construct a house bit by bit, although that possibility, he believes, is a few decades away.

Closer to implementation may be a technology developed by Behrokh Khoshnevis, a professor of industrial and systems engineering at the University of Southern California. Khoshnevis calls his method of constructing houses “contour crafting.” In this process, a large robotic arm deposits layer after layer of concrete to build walls in much the same way that Sass’s 3-D printer deposits powder. Khoshnevis and Sass are exploring questions such as how the roofs of contour-crafted homes could be built. Contour crafting has generated considerable interest in Japan; Khoshnevis says that NASA is also interested in the technique as a possible way to build the first domiciles on other planets.

But not all of Sass’s efforts are aimed at such pie-in-the-sky applications. He realizes that it will be years before his ideas catch on among architectural firms, and decades before automation moves full force onto the construction site. Until then, he says, he is happy educating others and finding smaller, more practical targets for the technology. For example, he is developing a type of emergency shelter that can be assembled from plywood pieces shaped using automated techniques. He and graduate student Nicolas Rader are working out the kinks in a design that would allow the pieces to be cut out by a computer-controlled router and shipped in a couch-sized box. During assembly, the pieces should fit so snugly that no glue or nails are required–just a rubber mallet to bang them into place. Sass is working with Georgia Institute of Technology professor of architecture Chuck Eastman to plan a way to use Georgia Tech’s technologically advanced woodworking lab to produce the parts. The final product will be less than quaint–but nonetheless an important and elegant demonstration of a technique that could someday change the world’s architectural landscape.

0 comments about this story. Start the discussion »

Reprints and Permissions | Send feedback to the editor

From the Archives


Introducing MIT Technology Review Insider.

Already a Magazine subscriber?

You're automatically an Insider. It's easy to activate or upgrade your account.

Activate Your Account

Become an Insider

It's the new way to subscribe. Get even more of the tech news, research, and discoveries you crave.

Sign Up

Learn More

Find out why MIT Technology Review Insider is for you and explore your options.

Show Me