Select your localized edition:

Close ×

More Ways to Connect

Discover one of our 28 local entrepreneurial communities »

Be the first to know as we launch in new countries and markets around the globe.

Interested in bringing MIT Technology Review to your local market?

MIT Technology ReviewMIT Technology Review - logo

 

Unsupported browser: Your browser does not meet modern web standards. See how it scores »

King County, Wash., detective Robert Keppel was hunting a serial murderer in 1974. Working from the leanest of clues, his staff assembled some 30 lists of potential suspects. One named 4,000 University of Washington classmates of a female victim. Another, every patient released from the state’s mental wards in the preceding decade. Using a punch-card computer, the investigators compared the lists. Among the 25 that turned up most often was one now-infamous name: Ted Bundy.

Keppel, currently chief criminal investigator with the Washington State attorney general’s office, says that rudimentary program was the first ever written to catch a killer. Today, Keppel is again helping to pioneer crime-fighting computing by testing a new system developed at the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory in Richland, Wash. Called Computer Aided Tracking and Characterization of Homicides (CATCH), it uses a neural network to discover unseen patterns in the state’s computerized murder-investigation records.

Finding patterns in complex data is work that humans excel at-but computers don’t. Neural networks, however, process complex information much as the human brain does, says CATCH project leader Lars Kangas.

With funding from the National Institute of Justice, Kangas’ team fed data on 5,500 Washington homicides-solved and unsolved-into CATCH. The program clustered similar crimes based on over 200 variables. Homicides grouped together could be the work of one person. CATCH can also generate a suspect profile by comparing unsolved cases with similar solved cases.

Keppel’s crime analysts are studying the CATCH matrices to see if the neural network’s hunches were right. So far, the results are mixed: two murders committed by the same person ended up on opposite sides of the matrix, but elsewhere CATCH correctly grouped known serial crimes. Though it’s too soon to know if CATCH will make a decent detective, Keppel remains hopeful that the program will help finger monsters like Ted Bundy lurking in the data.

0 comments about this story. Start the discussion »

Tagged: Computing

Reprints and Permissions | Send feedback to the editor

From the Archives

Close

Introducing MIT Technology Review Insider.

Already a Magazine subscriber?

You're automatically an Insider. It's easy to activate or upgrade your account.

Activate Your Account

Become an Insider

It's the new way to subscribe. Get even more of the tech news, research, and discoveries you crave.

Sign Up

Learn More

Find out why MIT Technology Review Insider is for you and explore your options.

Show Me
×

A Place of Inspiration

Understand the technologies that are changing business and driving the new global economy.

September 23-25, 2014
Register »