Select your localized edition:

Close ×

More Ways to Connect

Discover one of our 28 local entrepreneurial communities »

Be the first to know as we launch in new countries and markets around the globe.

Interested in bringing MIT Technology Review to your local market?

MIT Technology ReviewMIT Technology Review - logo

 

Unsupported browser: Your browser does not meet modern web standards. See how it scores »

{ action.text }

If not for the recent wave of Feynmania, Gerard Milburn’s new book would probably have been called The Einstein Processor. In a 1935 paper, Einstein and colleagues Boris Podolsky and Nathan Rosen tried to discredit the new theory of quantum mechanics by demonstrating that it led to seemingly impossible results. The famous “EPR” paper showed that if two particles, A and B, are related by some past quantum interaction and an observer measures A’s momentum, then B’s momentum must instantaneously take on the opposite value-even if A and B are light-years apart. Einstein scorned this result, with its implication of faster-than-light communication, as “spooky action at a distance.”

Far from undermining quantum mechanics, however, the EPR paper proved to be science’s first glimpse of a bizarre phenomenon: quantum entanglement. Milburn, an Australian theoretical physicist working in the field of “quantum computing,” is the first to make entanglement and its real-world significance penetrable for the lay reader.

For other physicists, Milburn writes, the EPR argument pointed to realities Einstein was reluctant to accept. Most systems in the familiar world have definite states: a tossed coin comes up either heads or tails. But in the quantum world, governed by the uncertainty principle, different states commingle until measured; a bit can be a blend of a 0 and a 1, called a “qubit.” To represent this blending in calculations of the odds in quantum experiments, Milburn explains, Richard Feynman invented a quantity called “probability amplitude.” Entangled particles that seem to communicate instantaneously are simply obeying Feynman’s rule for adding probability amplitudes.

This esoteric realm has some remarkably practical implications. A computer using quantum versions of the classic logic gates such as AND, OR and NOT would be able to process all possible inputs simultaneously, Milburn explains, making it useful for problems such as finding the prime factors of very large numbers. (The magnitude of this task is the basis of today’s best encryption methods.)

Researchers have devised simple quantum logic gates and used entanglement to instantaneously impress one particle’s quantum state upon another faraway particle-opening up “teleportation” as a potential way to move information inside a computer. Though the work of Milburn and his colleagues revolves around uncertainty, they show little of this quality themselves when they predict that quantum entanglement will be the key to future gains in computing power. “It may take decades, perhaps a century,” Milburn writes, “but a commercially viable quantum computer is a certainty.”

0 comments about this story. Start the discussion »

Tagged: Computing

Reprints and Permissions | Send feedback to the editor

From the Archives

Close

Introducing MIT Technology Review Insider.

Already a Magazine subscriber?

You're automatically an Insider. It's easy to activate or upgrade your account.

Activate Your Account

Become an Insider

It's the new way to subscribe. Get even more of the tech news, research, and discoveries you crave.

Sign Up

Learn More

Find out why MIT Technology Review Insider is for you and explore your options.

Show Me