What We Don't Know in Physics

(Page 4 of 5)

  • January/February 2009
  • By Katherine Bourzac, SM '04

What Is Dark Matter?

Gabriella Sciolla, an associate professor of physics at MIT, hopes to validate supersymmetry through experiments on dark matter. Physicists know, from observing the gravitational interactions of galaxies and other celestial objects, that there is much more mass in the universe than they can account for by looking for the kinds identified by the standard model. This missing mass is called "dark matter" because it doesn't interact with photons. It cannot be seen with optical or x-ray telescopes. "For sure, I am a little biased, but for me, the most interesting open question in physics is, What is dark matter?" says Sciolla. One simple explanation is that it is made up of one or more of the supersymmetric particles.

In the bowels of Building NW13, in a windowless cinder-block room that her research group calls "the dungeon," Sciolla is testing a new apparatus called the Dark Matter Time Projection Chamber--essentially a large stainless-steel tank of gas flanked by two digital cameras. The principle behind the detector is simple. When a particle of dark matter strikes a gas atom, the atom will recoil, knocking loose electrons that will be detected by the cameras. By tracing the paths of these electrons, Sciolla will be able to see not only that a particle struck, but from which direction. That will be important in establishing that the detector is actually seeing dark matter, not something else. If, as many physicists believe, our galaxy is rotating through a stationary region of dark matter, then the dark matter should strike the atoms in Sciolla's detector like rain hitting the windshield of a moving car. The direction of this "rain" should vary by about 90º every 12 hours, because the axis of Earth's rotation is about 45º with respect to the dark matter.

Sciolla and her research group will station their detector in an underground lab to isolate it from cosmic rays, a major source of noise, and they'll spend 2009 gathering preliminary data to prove that the concept works. In a year, Sciolla hopes to have a one-cubic-meter detector that will be 50 times as sensitive; in five years, she hopes to have a detector as large as a few hundred cubic meters.

Finding dark-matter particles would be the physicist's equivalent of hitting the jackpot. "All these big questions in physics are somehow connected," Sciolla says. "Dark matter is the one answer that would satisfy so many different unanswered questions in different fields of physics." Detecting it would provide strong evidence for supersymmetry.

If dark matter turns out to consist not of supersymmetric particles but of axions, hypothetical particles that Wilczek did important work to describe, that finding could get at another huge question. Axions figure prominently in an esoteric theory that explains why matter--as opposed to antimatter--prevails in the universe, even though the Big Bang produced all the particles and their antiparticles in equal numbers.

Print

Related Articles

Big Bang Detector Heads to Space

A unique particle physics detector will be attached to the space station to study the universe and its origins.

Physics: A Family Business

Modern physics through the generations.

Close Comments

To comment, please sign in or register

Forgot my password

magdala

8 Comments

  • 929 Days Ago
  • 07/30/2009

Could the Big Bang Singularity have been a Black Hole Singularity?

When the Big Bang (Black Hole), went BANG, singularity was shattered or broken up & the energy created formed the mini blackhole particles & the dimensions (hidden & our observable one). When the blackhole particles bonded together, creating matter, matter and it's antimatter pairs annihilated (antimatter was sucked into the mini blackholes, wormholes into other dimensions of time & space) leaving behind an access of matter in our observable universe. The CMBR is a result of this transition. Gravity being so dominant w/ in a BH, would therefore be the same force as the strong force, which holds particles together w/ in atoms. However, they behave differently on the micro vrs. macro scale. Maybe, we need to rethink gravity... maybe gravity, is actually an effect of magnetism. For Exp; W/ in a BH is a magnetic field & gravity is great. Earth has a magnetic field, so gravity here is as strong as the magnetic field surrounding our planet (whatever the formula). Spacetime was formed by singularity, time and space(Spacetime)is a result of singularity being broken up... the expansion of the universe was triggered by the dark energy w/ in the black hole (a BH in a paralell universe, or maybe the expansion of our universe is being triggered by the expansion of extra hidden dimensions which are also expanding, causing our dimension of spacetime (the observable universe) to also expand.

Reply

luddite

407 Comments

  • 523 Days Ago
  • 09/09/2010

Re: Could the Big Bang Singularity have been a Black Hole Singularity?

Try not to confuse the concept of time/spacetime with a simple vectored event horizon. This is a common misconception. While I could say a lot more on this particular subject, it is only my humble opinion and nothing more. You have some ideas which are worth pursuing. Keep a journal with your thoughts on the subject, then keep us all posted as to whether you make any progress bringing your hypothesis forward. Perhaps someone with a vested interest in expanding on the theme will have something worthwhile to offer in the process.

Reply

Advertisement

MAGAZINE

Can We Build Tomorrow's Breakthroughs?

Manufacturing in the United States is in trouble. That's bad news not just for the country's economy but for the future of innovation.

Videos

Meet 2011 TR35 Winner Jesse Robbins

More

Advertisement

Technology Review Lists

TR50

Our list of the 50 most innovative companies, including the following:

Serious Materials

Synthetic Genomics

Facebook

Applied Materials

More

Advertisement
Advertisement