Cosmic Detective: Professor Gabriella Sciolla has built an apparatus to detect dark matter.

What We Don't Know in Physics

MIT physicists seek the origins of mass, the nature of dark matter, and beautiful equations to describe the universe.

  • January/February 2009
  • By Katherine Bourzac, SM '04

Standing on the fire escape of his office in Geneva, Switzerland, assistant professor of physics Steven Nahn, PhD '98, enjoys the evening air as he enumerates some of the universe's greatest mysteries. The question he's working on, he says, is so simple a child could ask it: "Where does mass come from?"

Answering it requires explaining why the fundamental par­ticles that make up all the matter in the universe have mass. So Nahn and about 30 other MIT researchers and students are working on experiments to run on the Large Hadron Collider, the new particle accelerator based at the European Organization for Nuclear Research. The LHC is an exercise in extremes: at temperatures near absolute zero, it will accelerate particles to the highest energies ever achieved experimentally, its thousands of powerful magnets guiding protons along a circular path 27 kilometers in circumference until they collide. The instrument is slated to be fully operational later this year, and Nahn figures he'll spend half of the year working there; his students and other researchers are spending most of their time at the LHC. Each wants to be part of the team investigating one the biggest questions in physics.

"I find it ironic," muses Nahn. "It seems like a very simple question, but it takes an enormous accelerator and thousands of physicists working on it to try to find out the right answer."

Many of the other questions driving MIT physicists are just as basic. Another big one that LHC experiments could resolve concerns the nature of about 23 percent of the universe--the so-called dark matter, whose existence is inferred from gravitational effects on visible objects. Physicists simply don't know what it is. "Where is all the stuff?" Nahn says, half joking. "You'd think we'd know."

Advertisement

To be a physicist is to puzzle over what the rest of us take for granted--that objects have mass, that the universe consists of matter instead of antimatter, that gravity works.

Physicists around the world are now working to expand and revise the parts list of the universe--what's known as the standard model, a compact distillation of about 100 years of research, which attempts to describe the particles and forces that account for all physical phenomena. The standard model includes 12 fundamental particles that constitute matter as we know it, plus their equal but opposite antiparticles. It includes the four fundamental forces governing interactions between particles: gravity, electromagnetism (which is responsible for light, magnetism, and electricity), and the strong and weak forces (which mediate the interactions within atomic nuclei). And it includes particles that carry the four forces--although the one carrying gravity remains hypothetical.

This framework ties together everything that particle physicists know to be true. It tells us that atomic nuclei, once thought to be indivisible, are made up of protons and neutrons; protons and neutrons are further divisible into particles called quarks, which are held together by the strong force, whose carrier is the gluon.

Print

Related Articles

Big Bang Detector Heads to Space

A unique particle physics detector will be attached to the space station to study the universe and its origins.

Physics: A Family Business

Modern physics through the generations.

Close Comments

To comment, please sign in or register

Forgot my password

magdala

8 Comments

  • 928 Days Ago
  • 07/30/2009

Could the Big Bang Singularity have been a Black Hole Singularity?

When the Big Bang (Black Hole), went BANG, singularity was shattered or broken up & the energy created formed the mini blackhole particles & the dimensions (hidden & our observable one). When the blackhole particles bonded together, creating matter, matter and it's antimatter pairs annihilated (antimatter was sucked into the mini blackholes, wormholes into other dimensions of time & space) leaving behind an access of matter in our observable universe. The CMBR is a result of this transition. Gravity being so dominant w/ in a BH, would therefore be the same force as the strong force, which holds particles together w/ in atoms. However, they behave differently on the micro vrs. macro scale. Maybe, we need to rethink gravity... maybe gravity, is actually an effect of magnetism. For Exp; W/ in a BH is a magnetic field & gravity is great. Earth has a magnetic field, so gravity here is as strong as the magnetic field surrounding our planet (whatever the formula). Spacetime was formed by singularity, time and space(Spacetime)is a result of singularity being broken up... the expansion of the universe was triggered by the dark energy w/ in the black hole (a BH in a paralell universe, or maybe the expansion of our universe is being triggered by the expansion of extra hidden dimensions which are also expanding, causing our dimension of spacetime (the observable universe) to also expand.

Reply

luddite

407 Comments

  • 522 Days Ago
  • 09/09/2010

Re: Could the Big Bang Singularity have been a Black Hole Singularity?

Try not to confuse the concept of time/spacetime with a simple vectored event horizon. This is a common misconception. While I could say a lot more on this particular subject, it is only my humble opinion and nothing more. You have some ideas which are worth pursuing. Keep a journal with your thoughts on the subject, then keep us all posted as to whether you make any progress bringing your hypothesis forward. Perhaps someone with a vested interest in expanding on the theme will have something worthwhile to offer in the process.

Reply

Advertisement

MAGAZINE

Can We Build Tomorrow's Breakthroughs?

Manufacturing in the United States is in trouble. That's bad news not just for the country's economy but for the future of innovation.

Videos

Meet 2011 TR35 Winner Jesse Robbins

More

Advertisement

Technology Review Lists

TR50

Our list of the 50 most innovative companies, including the following:

Lattice Power

Pacific Biosciences

Life Technologies

Google

More

Advertisement
Advertisement