The Chinese Solar Machine Layer by Layer Fire in the Library The Mystery Behind Anesthesia
(Page 3 of 3)
Schweickart has launched a campaign to save life as we know it. "No one is looking at how to prevent an asteroid impact, which could wipe out millions of people and affect the global economy," he says. To help prevent such a catastrophe, he founded the B612 Foundation, whose goal is "to significantly alter the orbit of an asteroid, in a controlled manner, by 2015." (B612 is the asteroid home of the Little Prince in St. Exupéry's children's story.)
Working with several organizations, including the ASE, NASA, and the European Space Agency, Schweickart has raised awareness about near-Earth asteroids (NEAs). He is leading the ASE effort to draft an international treaty on the deflection of near-Earth objects, including asteroids, to be presented to the United Nations in 2009. And he was a guest on a recent episode of Nova ScienceNow that focused on NEAs. "We have probably been hit by objects as big as 100 kilometers, which boils off most of the water in the oceans," says Schweickart. "The whole evolution of life has been shaped by asteroids and comets hitting the earth."
NASA's Spaceguard Survey has already identified nearly 850 asteroids one kilometer in diameter or larger. "But we realized that the problem would be with smaller, far more numerous objects that are more likely to hit Earth," Schweickart says. Schweickart estimates that there is about a 2 percent chance of such a destructive collision happening in this century. "We began working with Congress to bring the discovery size down to 140 meters," he says. "We anticipate finding 100 times more objects." Although several NASA-supported research groups, including the Jet Propulsion Laboratory at Caltech, now track close approaches of near-Earth objects (neo.jpl.nasa.gov/ca), B612 advocates not just tracking NEAs but also devising a plan--tested beforehand--to prevent a devastating hit.
Blowing up asteroids with nuclear weapons, Schweickart says, is "Hollywood" and the worst thing one could do: "You'll only compound the problem and aggravate your grandchildren's lives." (He has 11 grandchildren and seven children of his own.) B612 has developed two deflection techniques, the newest of which is a gravitational tractor. Ed Lu and Stan Love, who invented the gravitational tractor, are NASA astronauts at the Johnson Space Center and founding members of B612. Their method employs the basic principle of gravity: any two masses attract each other.
"We've proposed flying an unmanned spacecraft out to an asteroid and parking it in front of the asteroid. It's pulling you, and you pull it," says Schweickart. "Gravitational pull acts on both bodies. We would use a very small pair of ion engines with little thrust [so] that [the vehicle would] hover in front of the asteroid and not fall to the surface. [Park] it long enough, and you get the velocity change you need--even if it's weeks, months, or years."
Schweickart is undaunted by the immensity of the task he's tackling. And although no agency in any nation has yet been assigned responsibility for preventing asteroids from hitting Earth, he's not daunted by the politics, either. "For the first time, humankind, in conjunction with the machines we've built, has the capability to assume responsibility for the continuation of our own future," he says. "That's what I'm dedicating my time to--getting our cosmic act together."
For more information on Schweickart's B612 Foundation, visit www.B612Foundation.org.
For more photos of Schweickart in space, visit www.technologyreview.com/media/rusty.
Guest (Spacer One)
Does Dr. Schweickart know that I discovered the Technology used by the Flying Saucer for propulsion? How the spheres are used as Monopole HV Generators?
After I got the Patent, I suggested to Nasa to use it. They asked me to send a copy to the
Glenn Research Site in Cleveland, Ohio.
I did and advised them strongly to contact me before trying it out.
The Propulsion Engineers were aghast.
Who would need them, if a Shuttle, equipped with the technology, would not use rockets but take off (VTOL) and fly with a constant acceleration (and braking) speed of One G within one hour to the ISS?
No heat-shields needed?
No barf-bags?
No osteoporosis?
A forcefield that would protect Shuttle and Crew at all times from foreign objects and radiation?
NO WAY
"Not interested, thank you for the copy of your Patent (4,095,162).
After the Space Disasters they decided to experiment with it, did not contact me and caused another disaster: THe big Black-out in 2004.
When the voltage is not controlled, it acts as an E-Bomb. It blew the Power Transformer Station on their grounds to Kingdom Come.
A poor, innocent, little tree was blamed.
Then they advised Head quarters that Rockets were the only safe way to fly.
I had advised Dr. Teller, who was working on the anti-missile-missile program to use it. It would zap the electronics of any incoming missile.
They tried it and it worked.
Unfortunately one of the people, working in the group, was a XXX-American and sold it to China.
China used it to zap a brand-new Japanese Spy Satellite.
Then they sent another missile up to destroy the evidence.
Then the US DOD refused to pay me my fee of $11 million.
When I got the Patent, my US Patent Lawyer, Mr. Farkas, told me that Dr. Kahn of the Hudson Institute had informed him that a study had evaluated the invention at $600 Billion, if the US would have it before Russia. He predicted the Nobel Prize for me.
The Shuttles could still be converted for $100 million (or less) and could fly for another ten years with many new young Astronauts.
They could land on any big Asteroid or Europe and do some mining, Errant asteroids could be gently led to their death by pushing them into Jupiter.
They could fly to the Moon in a couple of hours and within one day to Mars. Place satellites, clean space junk and dump it into Jupiter.
I would ask Nasa to pay me my fee of $50 million, not $600 Billion.
Nasa would not have to wait for another twenty years to go to Mars.
One Shuttle, converted this year, could do it this year or next year.
The Rocket Propulsion Lobby is of course dead-set against it.
A Flying Saucer does not use oil.
It "taps" power right out of the aether, like Tesla (I suspect) did for his Pierce Arrow in 1931.
Have you any idea, what that "Spin-off " might be worth?
I found many other spin-offs.
Should I now sell it to Russia? India?
Time is of essence, I waited long enough.
After June 15 someone else should have a chance.
Whoever rules Space, rules the Earth.
Maybe Dr. Schweickraft should write another letter to the President.
Regards,
Joseph Hiddink
Manufacturing in the United States is in trouble. That's bad news not just for the country's economy but for the future of innovation.
Our list of the 50 most innovative companies, including the following:
sougatapahari
18 Comments
Truely Impressive
I have Seen a few documentaries about Asteroid impact scenarios on TV and Dr. Rusty Schweickart was in a few of them.
Most people still don't realize that despite all the advances mankind has achieved, Earth is still the only place now that we can call home. Regardless of this fact, we , supposedly the most advanced species are behaving in the most irresponsible manner and endangering this truly unique place.
It would perhaps take an event as drastic as a possible Asteroid impact to unite all the patches of this world we call countries together. Again, who knows, when we are starving for food and energy and we do manage to send a mission to avert a collision, an object as significant as a single bolt in space could jeopardize the entire mission... and why is that ? Because we are indiscriminately creating orbital debris !!!
I hope the tale of this Genius's life could be an inspiration for many people to make a difference.
Reply