The Chinese Solar Machine Layer by Layer Fire in the Library The Mystery Behind Anesthesia
(Page 2 of 2)
To make what's fascinating about MIT even more accessible, the museum is spearheading an interdisciplinary project to turn the whole campus into an exhibit. Led by curator of science and technology Deborah Douglas, the Collaborative Mapping Project will let users of handheld devices such as PDAs take tours and access information about MIT's past and present based on where they are standing. A visitor to the Stata Center could find out what went on in the former buildings on its site -- much of the radar used in World War II, for example, was developed in Building 20's RadLab -- as well as what's happening today behind Noam Chomsky's door.
The project will be "more than an acoustiguide on steroids," says Douglas. Once its infrastructure is in place, the system will amount to a "living encyclopedia of the campus." The Collaborative Mapping Project will allow anyone to add information, much like Wikipedia. Alumni could contribute memories about living on West Campus; facilities workers could view and update information about how many times a pipe has been repaired; the Disabilities Services Office could add information on wheelchair-friendly routes. "This is something like the Web, that can grow spontaneously in all directions," Douglas explains. Information could also be tailored to specific users. An eight-year-old visitor interested in robots could access a different tour than a researcher on campus for an international artificial-intelligence conference. A prototype offering a simple campus tour will be finished by fall 2007; the entire system will be ready for MIT's 150th anniversary in 2011. Douglas says the "museum without walls" will be "one of the best birthday gifts the Institute could give itself."
Even as remodeling plans and the Collaborative Mapping Project get under way, Durant is thinking about how to use the museum's existing space to do a better job of immersing the public in the scientific process. His goal is to document research "in real time, rather than only and always interpreting science and technology through the accomplishments of the past." It's a tall order, because typical large museum galleries take one to several years to plan, several years to fund, and several years more to build. In the meantime, their exhibits have often become outdated.
"In more radical places, like the Wellcome Wing at London's Science Museum, people are designing exhibits that can literally grow and track an ongoing scientific or technological area by addition, rather like an animal growing new segments," says Durant. Constantly updating an exhibit, however, is a labor--intensive process that he compares to putting out a maga-zine, with a team of curators constantly scouting for new information and "editing" the exhibit. The MIT Museum now has a small Emerging Technologies Gallery, where new MIT work is showcased for a few months at a time. The gallery, which recently displayed real-time maps of campus wireless usage, may expand when the museum is remodeled.
Eager to offer face-to-face encounters with scientists and turn the museum into a public forum, Durant has initiated Soap Box, a series of free evening programs bringing MIT scientists into the museum for salon-style conversations. Large, enthusiastic audiences have discussed the implications of genetic engineering with the Broad Institute's David Altshuler and chatted with Rodney Brooks, director of the Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory. Each program begins with a "short and sharp" introduction by the featured professor, Durant says, but "the real emphasis is audience engagement." Participants break into small groups for discussion; the program ends with a Q&A session. Soap Box videos posted online become fodder for an online chat. "We want to use it as a pebble to create as many ripples as possible," says Durant.
"This place is a powerhouse of research with a focus on getting on with it," he says. For Durant and his staff, there's a real accomplishment in just keeping up.
Manufacturing in the United States is in trouble. That's bad news not just for the country's economy but for the future of innovation.
Our list of the 50 most innovative companies, including the following: