Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

March/April 2006

Universal Authentication

Leading the development of a privacy-protecting online ID system, Scott Cantor is hoping for a safer Internet.

By David Talbot

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon

This article is the seventh in a series of 10 stories we're running over two weeks, covering today's most significant (and just plain cool) emerging technologies. It's part of our annual "10 Emerging Technologies" report, which appears in the March/April print issue of Technology Review.

If you're like most people, you've established multiple user IDs and passwords on the Internet -- for your employer or school, your e-mail accounts, online retailers, banks, and so forth. It's cumbersome and confusing, slowing down online interactions if only because it's so easy to forget the plethora of passwords. Worse, the diversity of authentication systems increases the chances that somewhere, your privacy will be compromised, or your identity will be stolen.

[Click here for an example of univeral authentication.]

The balkanization of today's online identity-verifying systems is a big part of the Internet's fraud and security crisis. As Kim Cameron, Microsoft's architect of identity and access, puts it in his blog, "If we do nothing, we will face rapidly proliferating episodes of theft and deception that will cumulatively erode public trust in the Internet." Finding ways to bolster that trust is critically important to preserving the Internet as a useful, thriving medium, argues David D. Clark, an MIT computer scientist and the Internet's onetime chief protocol architect.

Scott Cantor, a senior systems developer at Ohio State University, thinks the answer may lie in Web "authentication systems" that allow users to hop securely from one site to another after signing on just once. Such systems could protect both users' privacy and the online businesses and other institutions that offer Web-based services.

Story continues below


Cantor led the technical development of Shibboleth, an open-standard authentication system used by universities and the research community, and his current project is to expand its reach. He has worked, not only to make the system function smoothly, but also to build bridges between it and parallel corporate efforts. "Scott is the rock star of the group," says Steven Carmody, an IT architect at Brown University who manages a Shibboleth project for Internet2, an Ann Arbor, MI-based research consortium that develops advanced Internet technologies for research laboratories and universities. "Scott's work has greatly simplified the management of these Internet-based relationships, while ensuring the required security and level of assurance for each transaction."

Shibboleth acts not only as an authentication system but also -- counterintuitively -- as a guardian of privacy. Say a student at Ohio State wishes to access Brown's online library. Ohio State securely holds her identifying information -- name, age, campus affiliations, and so forth. She enters her user ID and password into a page on Ohio State's website. But when she clicks through to Brown, Shibboleth takes over. It delivers only the identifying information Brown really needs to know: the user is a registered Ohio State student.

Comments

  • Double-edge sword
    "Worse, the diversity of authentication systems increases the chances that somewhere, your privacy will be compromised, or your identity will be stolen."

    Single sign-on means that losing your password will have greater implication than before. Is there any way of overcome this problem ?
    Rate this comment: 12345
    Guest (chuan)
    04/27/2006
    Posts:1
    • [no subject]
      Single sign-on doesn't imply passwords. Stronger authentication is the best way to deal with the single credential problem. Also, note that most non-technical users just reuse the same passwords everywhere, making the exposure very similar with or without SSO.
      Rate this comment: 12345
      Guest (Scott Cantor)
      04/27/2006
      Posts:1
  • Outside Academia
    When I log in to a commercial account -- for example a brokerage account or my mortgage records -- they need to know a lot more than that I am registered at a particular university. How does this system apply outside the academic world?
    Rate this comment: 12345
    Guest (farang)
    05/01/2006
    Posts:1
    • [no subject]
      Any number of attributes (name, account numbers, etc) about a user can be sent along to the service provider.  You are not limited to simply affiliation-type data.
      Rate this comment: 12345
      Guest (Will Norris)
      05/22/2006
      Posts:1
  • False confidence
    Any system that produces a sense of enhanced confidence in its reliability will cause greater difficulties to the person whose identity is compromised. it is human nature.  However, since most people only use a few passwords over and over again, single-signing is not inherently more insecure. to believe it can't be hacked is naive. See http://rfidanalysis.org/
    Rate this comment: 12345
    Guest (threemallards)
    05/15/2006
    Posts:1
  • Universal Identity and NetAlter
    NetAlter is developing an Alternative to the Internet and one of the key features is the concept of Universal Identity that will access multiple services and applications. However there is a minor difference in that the user gets to decide if he or she wants one single ID or seperate IDs. And even if the user creates seperate ID, all of these will have reference to the Universal ID that is provided at the time of registration with NetAlter (which ofcourse is free to end users)
    Rate this comment: 12345
    Guest (Gurudatt Shenoy)
    08/04/2006
    Posts:1
  • Not even geographic knowledge
    "Australia, Belgium, England, Finland" the poor author does not even have basic geographic knowledge that the UK is 4 countries not just England. It is like saying "Ohio" when you mean USA. If he can't get that even right, I would not even bother with the rest of article.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    OsamaBinLade...
    11/11/2006
    Posts:1

Technology Review Magazine

The Knowledge
Biotechnology’s advance presents dark possibilities. Terrorists can develop biological weapons. Worse, the life sciences could give malefactors the ability to manipulate fundamental life processes -- and even affect human behavior.

FEATURES

10 Emerging Technologies
This year, our list of technologies that are worth keeping an eye on is particularly wide ranging -- but all of our picks are ready to have a big impact on business, medicine and culture.
The Fountain of Health
Antiaging researchers aren’t likely to find ways to extend life anytime soon. But their work could provide a powerful approach to treating the many diseases of old age.

Read more articles from this Issue

NOTEBOOKS FORWARD Q&A PHOTO ESSAY REVIEWS HACK DEMO
Archives MIT News Subscribe Contact

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement

Videos

Malleable Maps, Artistic Robots and Bubble Interfaces
Technology Review January/February 2010

Current Issue

Security in the Ether
Information technology's next grand challenge will be to secure the cloud--and prove we can trust it.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Subscribe to Technology Review's daily e-mail update. Enter your e-mail address

TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES

More Technology News from Forbes

Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology © 2010 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.