Technology Review - Published By MIT
Log in to My.TechnologyReview.com | Register
Advertisement
[1] 2 Next »

March/April 2006

Nanomedicine

James Baker designs nanoparticles to guide drugs directly into cancer cells, which could lead to far safer treatments.

By Kevin Bullis

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon

This article is the second in a series of 10 stories we're running over two weeks, covering today's most significant (and just plain cool) emerging technologies. It's part of our annual "10 Emerging Technologies" report, which appears in the March/April print issue of Technology Review.

The treatment begins with an injection of an unremarkable-looking clear fluid. Invisible inside, however, are particles precisely engineered to slip past barriers such as blood vessel walls, latch onto cancer cells, and trick the cells into engulfing them as if they were food. These Trojan particles flag the cells with a fluorescent dye and simultaneously destroy them with a drug.

Developed by University of Michigan physician and researcher James Baker, these multipurpose nanoparticles -- which should be ready for patient trials later this year -- are at the leading edge of a nanotechnology-based medical revolution. Such methodically designed nanoparticles have the potential to transfigure the diagnosis and treatment of not only cancer but virtually any disease. Already, researchers are working on inexpensive tests that could distinguish a case of the sniffles from the early symptoms of a bioterror attack, as well as treatments for disorders ranging from rheumatoid arthritis to cystic fibrosis. The molecular finesse of nanotechnology, Baker says, makes it possible to "find things like tumor cells or inflammatory cells and get into them and change them directly."

[To view an illustration of nanoparticles delivering a drug, click here.] 

Cancer therapies may be the first nanomedicines to take off. Treatments that deliver drugs to the neighborhood of cancer cells in nanoscale capsules have recently become available for breast and ovarian cancers and for Kaposi's sarcoma. The next generation of treatments, not yet approved, improves the drugs by delivering them inside individual cancer cells. This generation also boasts multifunction particles such as Baker's; in experiments reported last June, Baker's particles slowed and even killed human tumors grown in mice far more efficiently than conventional chemotherapy.

"The field is dramatically expanding," says Piotr Grodzinski, program director of the National Cancer Institute's Alliance for Nanotechnology in Cancer. "It's not an evolutionary technology; it's a disruptive technology that can address the problems which former approaches couldn't."

The heart of Baker's approach is a highly branched molecule called a dendrimer. Each dendrimer has more than a hundred molecular "hooks" on its surface. To five or six of these, Baker connects folic-acid molecules. Because folic acid is a vitamin, most cells in the body have proteins on their surfaces that bind to it. But many cancer cells have significantly more of these receptors than normal cells. Baker links an anticancer drug to other branches of the dendrimer; when cancer cells ingest the folic acid, they consume the deadly drugs as well.

[1] 2 Next »

Comments

  • Nanomedicine
    Guest (elem@msn) on 05/17/2006 at 12:00 AM
    Posts:
    1
    This is the best ray of light for so many HUMANS. Go to it!!!!!!
    Rate this comment: 12345
  • NanoMedicine
    Guest (Rodney E Bigler, Ph.D.) on 07/31/2006 at 12:00 AM
    Posts:
    1
    The idea that a dendrimer with some killing substance will be absorbed by cells that use folic acid is interesting.  Unfortunately all body cells to my knowledge use folic acid.  Eliminating a cancer depends upon surgical excision of the primary and killing the micrometastatic cells.  These specific cells can be targeted but not by their desire to ingest folic acid.
    Rate this comment: 12345
    • Re: NanoMedicine
      Biomedical Electronic Engineer on 08/20/2007 at 5:12 PM
      Posts:
      1
      I have to agree with Dr. Bigler. While reading the article I couldn’t help thinking about Las Vegas. However, when one considers the GI Cocktail traits of Chemotherapy there really isn’t much difference in risks. I believe in this situation we may not want to use this targeting system in conjunction with “killer” drugs but maybe direct delivery of beneficial drugs such as aspirin.
      Rate this comment: 12345
Advertisement

Current Issue

Technology Review July/August 2008
The Business of Social Networks
The future of the Web is social. But can social-networking sites ever make money?
•  Subscribe
Save 41%
•  Table of Contents
•  MIT News

Magazine Services

Career Resources

MIT Technology Insider

Stories and breaking news from inside MIT about the latest research, innovations, and startups--in a convenient monthly e-newsletter. Subscribe today
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES
Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology