The Chinese Solar Machine Layer by Layer Fire in the Library The Mystery Behind Anesthesia
Internet users should think carefully before relying on Gmail.
This story, by a veteran TR correspondent, first appeared in the Dec. 2005/Jan. 2006 issue of Technology Review. It explores the complex issues of privacy and data security as they relate to Gmail, the increasingly popular, free web-mail service from Google.
Google's Gmail raises important questions about the security and privacy of our personal information -- questions that should matter not just to users of the free Web-based e-mail system but to everyone who exchanges e-mail with Gmail users.
And since the technical underpinnings of Gmail might very well be the prototype for the next generation of desktop-computer applications, the answers to these questions potentially affect everyone.
But wait -- this is not another diatribe against the targeted advertisements Gmail shows while you read your mail. All of the worry surrounding that single issue has obscured a far more important one: data integrity and security. Gmail is so powerful, fast, and convenient that there's a huge incentive for you to keep all of your e-mail there. But there's a catch: Gmail makes no promise that a mail message you save today will still be there tomorrow -- nor that e-mail you delete today will be gone tomorrow. Using Gmail means placing a lot of trust in Google.
When Gmail was launched in April 2004, it boasted three strengths: scale, search, and sales. Scale was the most obvious; Google promised each user the ability to store a gigabyte of e-mail when competitors like Hotmail were offering a measly two megabytes. Google could make this offer because, at the time, its 100,000-plus computers had more than 20 petabytes of combined storage. Since then, Google has shown it can buy new hard drives faster than its users can fill the old ones up.
Search was Gmail's second strength. Instead of asking users to create "folders" and archive their e-mail like obedient file clerks, Gmail allowed them to simply click "archive" and banish e-mail messages from their in-boxes to an unseen holding area. Gmail users retrieve their archived mail by searching for it -- a process that is so fast and thorough that it's actually liberating.
Sales was Gmail's third strength -- one that was surprisingly controversial. When Google announced Gmail, it proudly proclaimed that it would analyze e-mail messages for common keywords and use them to customize advertisements. For example, an undergraduate reading a message about an upcoming assignment might simultaneously see an advertisement for a site that sells term papers.
Despite this apparent convenience, many privacy activists -- me among them -- called upon Google to describe how its targeted-advertising technology worked. The company responded this past October by dramatically expanding and clarifying its privacy policy. Google now explains that the advertisements are based on your computer's IP address, the content of the message you're reading, and your previous use of Gmail. But don't worry, Google says: your e-mail is scanned only by computers and never by human beings.
In addition, Google now makes it clear that you can delete individual e-mail messages or your entire Gmail account at any time. If you do, however, your old e-mail might remain on Google's servers for up to 60 days and on its "offline backup systems" for even longer. Although this may sound like an unacceptably long time, Google has in fact done a far better job in addressing the concerns of privacy activists than its competitors ever did.
Everybody wants to read your mail
Ever since there has been email, there has been controversy as to how private it is. In the early years thru the 90's many ISPs had no way of going through all of the data, so they hired 3rd party developers to create "sort-n-serve" tools that we now call search engines.
If you think that google is the only one looking for the keywords in your inbox, think again.
What do you think Hotmail, Yahoo, and AOL have been doing for years. They may not be as direct as google and TELLING you that they are doing it, but they are.
Fool yourself all u want, but the truth is everyone of the services u use wants to use your data as a way to advertise or to forcast trends and social movements.
As for me I don't care if they read my mail, so long as I can download the file into my thunderbird app and take it with me. The only real option for privacy is to stop using the internet and your cell phone. Good luck with that.
Manufacturing in the United States is in trouble. That's bad news not just for the country's economy but for the future of innovation.
Our list of the 50 most innovative companies, including the following:
Guest (Daniel)
This article has no point
There is no difference in security or privacy between gmail and other e-mail services. All e-mail, when not encrypted by the sender, can be stored and read by the e-mail service you use. There is no guarantee that POP e-mail is not stored for a long time after you download it. Nor is there any guarantee that messages aren't deleted before you download them. Also, gmail alows you to access it as a POP account and download messages that way. The article hilights problems with unencrypted e-mail in general but none of these are specific to gmail.
Reply
wut
5 Comments
Oh yes it does.
At least the other providers don't scan through my emails for the ads.
Reply