What Does "Affordable" Mean?
Traditionally, housing sales have been viewed as an economic engine. But in Massachusetts, housing sales--with the exception of condominiums--were flat last spring. And the area's population is shrinking. Census Bureau figures released last June showed that between April 2000 and July 2004, nearly 20,000 people, 3.4 percent of the city's population, left Boston.
Although no single factor can explain this migratory trend, the price of housing--the median cost of a single-family home in Massachusetts is closing in on $400,000, according to the Massachusetts Association of Realtors--is certainly a major issue.
Over the same period, more Americans moved to the South and West, where all 10 of the nation's fastest-growing cities larger than 100,000 people are located and where housing is far more affordable. During the four years that Boston shrank, the population of Gilbert, AZ, the nation's fastest-growing city during that time period, increased by nearly 50 percent. Yet even that growth did not pump housing prices up to the rarefied levels of Boston.
The trend toward unaffordability is of such grave significance to the region that MIT's 22-year-old Center for Real Estate introduced a special program in 2004 called the Housing Affordability Initiative. Its purpose is to better understand the issues that are contributing to the affordability problem and, by clarifying an often muddy picture, help the real-estate industry to address them.
That means research. During 2003, Henry Pollakowski, director of the initiative, and his colleagues spent a lot of time talking with industry professionals to learn what research was being done, what research needed to be done, and how the center could help solve the affordability problem. The first step was to clarify what "affordability" actually means.
"It's nearly impossible to explore ways to solve the problem if the scope of the problem is not clear," says Pollakowski. "Most of what we're doing is about getting facts straight. We're attempting to create a more economically meaningful definition of affordable that is sensitive to the many types of households, whether they rent or own, and the location of affordable units relative to jobs."
Mark Baranski, SM '02, senior vice president with the Overland Development Group, who was instrumental in the development of HAI, says, "Affordability is a multidisciplinary question. There are no simple answers, but MIT has traditionally been a nexus where different disciplines interact." The initiative, says Baranski, "represents a willingness to invent new ways to get the answers the industry needs."
Comments
FYI - I spent 20+ years living in SOuthern California, which is no longer the affordable state it was back in the 50s, 60s and to some extent the 70s. I moved because it was impossible to buy anything bigger than a 1100 sqft condo ($140K in 1995 - now selling for over $400K).
11/09/2005
Posts:1
I would find it very interesting to see some in-depth research into what types of home construction are most "affordable" in the long run. My own experience has been that there are alot of contradictory and unfounded beliefs about construction materials and methods that muddy the water significantly. Exactly how well does a wood-framed house compare to a house with metal studs in the long run? From a maintenance standpoint, how do conventional foundations compare to slab foundations?
11/09/2005
Posts:1
This knowledge, in itself, is of great value. Other cities, governments, and corporations could make better decisions with the help of good planning aids.
The big question is will this information be shared?
11/20/2005
Posts:1
And couldnt it be said that by limiting the supply of land, all lot sizes will be less affordable?
I just think the researchers are kind of off in what "low income" is? I finally graduated college and am making slightly less than their "low income" amount and I am feeling rich...but not that rich.
11/25/2005
Posts:1
In todays apartment rent housing, people are probably unhappy with rents, space, roaches, and noise. We might need to find out more knowledge about construction and building techniques for building some of these structures in the future. If we can use technology to combat some of these problems, it will all be better for all of us.
Sincerely,
Lilia Mallik
12/08/2005
Posts:1
We can also consider building housing underground or underwater. We should always think about quality of life issues for people.
12/08/2005
Posts:1
In todays apartment rent housing, people are probably unhappy with rents, space, roaches, and noise. We might need to find out more knowledge about construction and building techniques for building some of these structures in the future. If we can use technology to combat some of these problems, it will all be better for all of us.
Sincerely,
Lilia Mallik
12/08/2005
Posts:1
We can also consider building housing underground or underwater. We should always think about quality of life issues for people.
12/08/2005
Posts:1
But, we need to furthur explore the issues involved with these technolgies to ensure that they are cost effecient, economically benficial and are financially sensible.
These such technologies should ideally really giving a real return to the consumer very quickly. So, people will definitely see the value in their long-term investments in these types of systems.
12/07/2005
Posts:1
12/16/2005
Posts:1
12/31/2005
Posts:1
And couldnt it be said that by limiting the supply of land, all lot sizes will be less affordable?
I just think the researchers are kind of off in what "low income" is? I finally graduated college and am making slightly less than their "low income" amount and I am feeling rich...but not that rich.
11/25/2005
Posts:1
But, we need to furthur explore the issues involved with these technolgies to ensure that they are cost effecient, economically benficial and are financially sensible.
These such technologies should ideally really giving a real return to the consumer very quickly. So, people will definitely see the value in their long-term investments in these types of systems.
12/07/2005
Posts:1
12/16/2005
Posts:1
12/31/2005
Posts:1
FYI - I spent 20+ years living in SOuthern California, which is no longer the affordable state it was back in the 50s, 60s and to some extent the 70s. I moved because it was impossible to buy anything bigger than a 1100 sqft condo ($140K in 1995 - now selling for over $400K).
11/09/2005
Posts:1
I would find it very interesting to see some in-depth research into what types of home construction are most "affordable" in the long run. My own experience has been that there are alot of contradictory and unfounded beliefs about construction materials and methods that muddy the water significantly. Exactly how well does a wood-framed house compare to a house with metal studs in the long run? From a maintenance standpoint, how do conventional foundations compare to slab foundations?
11/09/2005
Posts:1
This knowledge, in itself, is of great value. Other cities, governments, and corporations could make better decisions with the help of good planning aids.
The big question is will this information be shared?
11/20/2005
Posts:1