Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

AT&T quietly introduces $10 DSL plan, part of BellSouth acquisition concessions

By Associated Press

Monday, June 18, 2007

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon

NEW YORK (AP) -- Without any sort of fanfare, AT&T Inc. has started offering a broadband Internet service for $10 a month, cheaper than any advertised plan.

The DSL, or digital subscriber line, plan introduced Saturday is part of the concessions made by AT&T to the Federal Communications Commission to get its $86 billion acquisition of BellSouth Corp. approved last December.

The $10 offer is available to customers in the 22-state AT&T service region, which includes former BellSouth areas, who have never had AT&T or BellSouth broadband, spokesman Michael Coe confirmed Monday. Local phone service and a one-year contract are required. The modem is free.

The plan was not mentioned in a Friday news release about AT&T's DSL plans, and is slightly hidden on the AT&T Web site. A page describing DSL options doesn't mention it, but clicking a link for ''Term contract plans'' reveals it. It's also presented to customers who go into the application process, Coe said.

The service provides download speeds of up to 768 kilobits per second and upload speeds of up to 128 kbps, matching the speeds of the cheapest advertised AT&T plan, which costs $19.95 per month in the nine-state former BellSouth area and $14.99 in the 13 states covered by AT&T before the acquisition.

BellSouth generally had higher prices for DSL before it was acquired, and the price difference persists, though AT&T did cut the price of the cheapest advertised plan in the Southeast region by $5 from $24.95 on Saturday.

The agreement with the FCC required the company to offer the plan for at least 2½ years. Coe said he could not comment on future advertising plans for the offer.

The introduction of the plan, slightly before the deadline at the end of June, was first reported by The Tennessean in Nashville.

Another concession to the FCC is yet to come: a plan for DSL that doesn't require local phone service. AT&T has another six months to introduce that option, which should cost at most $19.95 per month.

Consumer advocates have fought for this so-called ''naked DSL plan,'' because DSL can carry Internet-based phone calls for less than the price of local phone service. However, at 768 kbps, the download speed may be too low to appeal to the relatively sophisticated customers who use the Internet for phone calls.

------

Story continues below

On the Net:

http://www.att.com

Comments

  • "Download speeds too low..." HA!
    There was a comment in this AP article saying that download speeds would be too low for people to be interested in making IP phone calls.  What a joke.  Most people that have Broadband Cable internet barely get 100 KB/s in highly populated area.  With a true DSL line that functions well, 769 KB/s is amazing and all you would need for most Internet applications.  Right now, my area is growing so fast that my Broadband only gets me 64 KB/s for download speeds!  DSL is better than Broadband because it doesn't lose bandwidth as more users come online in your area.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    grausc01
    06/20/2007
    Posts:12
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
    • Re: "Download speeds too low..." HA!
      "DSL is better than Broadband because it doesn't lose bandwidth as more users come online in your area."

      DSL _is_ a "broadband" technology--one of several currently available. Cable internet access (which is what seems to be referred to above) is one of the other currently available broadband technologies. Given that lil corrective, the statement is true to some extent. Fortunately, in my application, cable internet access is hands down better than any DSL available--less expensive and much, much faster in both DL speeds (better than 5mbs consistently) and download speeds, which regularly exceed that of DSL.

      The AT&T/Bellsouth "DSL Lite" plan referenced would certainly be "good enough" for the Aunt Tillies and Uncle Joes out there, and would be fine for VOIP, etc., but even were it available in my area, I'd give it a pass. TDS: Too D_____ Slow. Oh, and AT&T (who needs the aggravation?)
      Rate this comment: 12345

      mnmus
      06/26/2007
      Posts:1
  • voip
    Wouldn't the upload speed be the limiting factor with this plan?  I would think that VOIP consumes equal capacity for upload and download.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    benchtester
    06/20/2007
    Posts:3
    • Re: voip
      Sure, but telco-quality voice only needs 64kbps "uncompressed" [G.711] (in each direction), and actually a lot less because the standard compression schemes [e.g. G.729] are very good.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      ms
      06/20/2007
      Posts:129
      Avg Rating:
      4/5

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement

Videos

Making 3D Maps on the Move
Technology Review November/December 2009

Current Issue

Natural Gas Changes the Energy Map
The United States has vast supplies of this cleaner fossil fuel. But how should we use it?
Advertisement
Advertisement
Subscribe to Technology Review's daily e-mail update. Enter your e-mail address

TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES

More Technology News from Forbes

Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology © 2009 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.