The Chinese Solar Machine Layer by Layer Fire in the Library The Mystery Behind Anesthesia
CAMBRIDGE, Massachusetts (AP) The founder of the ambitious ''$100 laptop'' project, which plans to give inexpensive computers to schoolchildren in developing countries, revealed that the machine for now costs $175 (euro129), and it will be able to run Windows in addition to its homegrown, open-source interface.
Nicholas Negroponte, the former director of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology Media Lab who now heads the nonprofit One Laptop Per Child project, updated analysts and journalists Thursday on where the effort stands, saying ''we are perhaps at the most critical stage of OLPC's life.''
That is partly because at least seven nations have expressed interest in being in the initial wave to buy the little green-and-white ''XO'' computers _ Uruguay, Argentina, Brazil, Pakistan, Thailand, Nigeria and Libya _ but it remains unclear which ones will be first to come up with the cash. The project needs orders for 3 million machines so its manufacturing and distribution effort can get rolling.
The ever-optimistic Negroponte did not sound worried, however: He expects mass production to begin by October, and he said many other countries, including Peru and Russia, have been inquiring about taking part.
The XO machines will be made by Quanta Computer Inc., the world's leading manufacturer of portable computers. Quanta agreed to take a profit of about $3 (euro2.20) per machine, less than what it gets from mainstream PC companies, Negroponte said.
Even so, the machine _ which boasts extremely low electricity consumption, a pulley for hand-generated power, built-in wireless networking and a screen with indoor and outdoor reading modes _ now costs $175 (euro129). The One Laptop project takes an additional $1 (euro0.74) to fund its distribution efforts.
Negroponte's team has always stressed that $100 (euro74) was a long-term target for the machines, but recently publicized figures had put it in the $150 (euro110) range. Negroponte says the cost should drop about 25 percent per year as the project unfolds. He added that Citigroup Inc.'s Citibank division has agreed to facilitate a payment system on a pro bono basis; Citibank will float payments to Quanta and other laptop suppliers, and governments will repay the bank.
Even at $175 ($129), the computers upend the standard economics in the PC industry. A huge reason has been XO's use of the free, open-source Linux operating system, tweaked for this project with the help of one of its sponsors, Red Hat Inc.
This is , without a doubt, one of the best ideas in history. The problem is, Intel ,MS, Apple, <insert favorite U.S. software/hardware company here> would like us to believe that "our" native US born children would not benefit somehow from the same general low-cost laptop concept. Hmm...NEWSFLASH - Poor children who need access to such a great low-cost computing platform exist RIGHT HERE in the USA too. When -will- we turn our technological savvy, intelligence, and perception towards our own people as well on this front? $699USD average for a 'decent' PC sure sounds better to WinApplTel on the home-front I am certain. <sighs> We never learn.
Manufacturing in the United States is in trouble. That's bad news not just for the country's economy but for the future of innovation.
Our list of the 50 most innovative companies, including the following:
Guest (don.hutchinson)
The $175 laptop
This is a techie'dream. Just provide a computer with internet access and "voila" kids will learn.
What is needed is a set of courses designed to teach.
A theft proof (only school WiFi) indestructible version, with good pedagogically designed course ware would be excellent for the inner city, for kids to take home with them - to show Mom,for parent teacher conferences (built in camera) etc
etc.
A recent government study showed that students did learn marginally better with computers - but ignored that the workload on teachers would allow more time for them to conduct other activities, such as one on one tutoring.
Don Hutchinson
Reply