|
Friday, January 25, 2008 Nano-ProspectingEnergy companies pour millions into nanotechnology for oil and gas recovery. By Duncan Graham-Rowe
Could nanotechnology help squeeze more oil and gas out of the ground? That's the hope of a consortium of energy companies that is putting millions of dollars into the development of new micro- and nanosensor technologies. The seven companies that make up the Advanced Energy Consortium (AEC), which includes Halliburton Energy Services, BP America, and ConocoPhilips, will put up $21 million in total to fund the research. The aim is to develop subsurface sensors that can be used to improve both the discovery and the recovery of hydrocarbons. "It's been a long time coming," says Wade Adams, director of the Richard E. Smalley Institute for Nanoscale Science and Technology at Rice University, in Houston, a technical partner to the consortium. "It's the first time the energy companies have got together to fund this kind of research, so it really is a big deal," he says. Currently, even with the most advanced recovery techniques, only about 40 percent of the oil and gas in reservoirs can be recovered. The hope is that by injecting novel sensors into these reservoirs, it will be possible to more accurately map them in 3-D, increase the amount of fuel extracted, and minimize the environmental impact. The financial investment--equivalent to $1 million per year from each company for three years--is "a very good sign," says Kris Pister, a professor of electrical engineering and computer science at the University of California, Berkeley, who has spent several years developing distributed sensors known as smart dust. It means that the energy companies now understand the potential of small-scale distributed-sensors technologies, he says. "There is good reason to suspect that this technology could help," says Pister. Distributed wireless sensor technologies are becoming increasingly sophisticated, and now even have their own wireless standard: the highway addressable remote transducer, or HART. Right now, the only way to find these reservoirs and gauge their precise size and capacity is through seismic means, or by simply drilling down. "But you don't get much information," says Adams. Surface and down-hole seismic techniques have limited resolution, while drilling can only take readings for the two-foot region surrounding the drill bore, he says. Moreover, oil and gas reservoirs tend not to be formed in huge underground chasms, or wells, as many people think. Instead, the reservoirs are formed in porous rock formations, which act like high-pressure geological sponges, says Scott Tinker, director of the AEC, state geologist of Texas and a professor at the University of Texas, in Austin. "The pores are very small," he says. They can be anywhere from 10 microns to one micron in diameter. Because of their size, once the initial high pressure of the reservoir has been reduced by releasing some of the oil, this porosity can impede the flow of oil or gas through the rock formation. "It can take a lot of work to get the oil out of the rock," says Tinker. |
Oil Left in the Ground
05/20/2008



Comments
jorfoas on 01/25/2008 at 4:08 PM
1
MakeSense on 01/27/2008 at 1:42 PM
61
As for oil and these nanosensors? It sounds nifty, but the article doesn't point out just how the sensors are supposed to disperse throughout a fluid-filled reservoir. I doubt it can be done, unless they plan to inject the sensors throughout waterflooding operations. In that case, they would give a partial picture of the reservoir volume contacted by water.
Here's an idea if the oil companies want to fund something worthwhile: Lawrenceville Plasma Physics is looking for a mere $2 million to develop what could be a commercial version of their Focus Fusion device. How about it BP?
mkogrady on 01/29/2008 at 2:00 PM
72
Who needs VC's when you have the government?
ajamin on 01/30/2008 at 2:26 PM
3
:::
The financial investment--equivalent to $1 million per year from each company for three years--is "a very good sign," says Kris Pister, a professor of electrical engineering and computer science at the University of California, Berkeley, who has spent several years developing distributed sensors known as smart dust.
:::
I instantly thought of this: BP Gives $500 million to UC Berkeley
sbkadar on 06/02/2008 at 1:28 AM
4