The Chinese Solar Machine Layer by Layer Fire in the Library The Mystery Behind Anesthesia
(Page 2 of 2)
Many drugs, from anticancer antibodies to hormones, work by activating cell receptors. Once a hormone is in the blood, however, there's no turning it on or off. "This shows that you can turn on and off the signal, and that you can do it instantly," says Christopher Chen, a bioengineer at the University of Pennsylvania. "That's something that's hard to do, for example, with an antibody."
Ingber has many ideas for devices that might integrate his method of cellular control. Magnetic pacemakers could use cells instead of electrodes to send electrical pulses to the heart. Implantable drug factories might contain many groups of cells, each of which makes a different drug when activated by a magnetic signal. Biomagnetic control might lead to computers that can take advantage of cells' processing power. "Cells do complex things like image processing so much better than computers," says Ingber. Ingber, who began the project in response to a call by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency for new cell-machine interfaces, acknowledges that his work is in its early stages. In fifty years, however, he expects that there will be devices that "seamlessly interface between living cells and machines."
Other researchers agree. Ingber's biomagnetic control "may represent a new mechanism for man-machine interfaces," says UC San Diego's Chien. But before such interfaces can be developed, says University of Pennsylvania engineer Chen, researchers need to learn a lot more about cells.
"Say we have cells on a chip and we know what behavior we want to elicit," such as getting a stem cell to enter a wound site and initiate repairs, says Chen. "We don't know what signaling events have to happen to put the cell into the right state" so that it will take the desired action.
In the short term, Chen says that Ingber's method could help biologists gain crucial knowledge about cell signaling, such as how these signals are processed chemically and physically by the cell, and how they lead to particular outcomes, from calcium uptake to changes in gene expression. "It provides a tool that lets us tweak the cell and see what happens," says Chen.
Manufacturing in the United States is in trouble. That's bad news not just for the country's economy but for the future of innovation.
Our list of the 50 most innovative companies, including the following:
Veronica_H
3 Comments
Side-Effect(s)
First, upon this subject, I think it is important to also consider the side-effect to human body when the cells being moved back and forth. Second, on a larger scale, I think we need to be responsible about how to use the power of knowledge. As our knowledge increases exponentially today, are we really capable to play the role of god holding the key of life--to control how we and other beings live, how long we live, and our relationship with nature. It is good to have power, but over-controling means losing power and losing control. We fight with desease; we also fight with revolution--when we cure and increase our survival rate, we also decrease the rate of our overall fitness and slowdown the speed of our revolution within nature. When we against nature's rules and become over-populated, we also become our own enemy. The question is how far should we go, and where should we draw the line and let it go. Surely, we want to ride the wheels of technology, but we do not want it speeds so fast that we become the ones that under the wheels. Overall, I think when we explore knowledge, we always need to keep in mind of its "two-faces," which is both beneficial and harmful, like using fire, we shall always be careful and responsible.
Reply