|
Wednesday, April 11, 2007 How to Make an Object InvisibleContinued from page 1 By Duncan Graham-Rowe
The solution was to design a device with tightly spaced needles of nanowires, 10 nanometers in diameter and 60 nanometers long, emanating from a cylindrical central spoke. In the current issue of the journal Nature Photonics, the researchers show how--in theory at least--this would cloak the object from red light of wavelength 632.8 nanometers long. There are limitations to this approach, however. A very small percentage of light would still be reflected, so the object would not be entirely invisible. Also, while the design can be adapted to work for other frequencies in the visible range, the design will still only work for a very narrow band of light. "This is a real problem," says Ulf Leonhardt, a professor of theoretical physics at St. Andrews University, in Scotland, and an expert in this field. "It would look completely odd, and you would definitely see something." But he says that this is not an indictment of the Purdue research; rather, it's a general problem with research into cloaking so far. "It's still an important step to go into the visible range," says Leonhardt. "And it's a definite step forwards." But to make things truly disappear before our eyes, a way will need to be found to make devices work across a broad range of frequencies, he says. Even so, using nanowires is a very practical way forward, says Pendry. "It's very useful because what we really want now is to see how well people can build them," he says. Indeed, this is what the group is working on now. "The next step is to fabricate and test an actual sample," says Alexander Kildishev, a research scientist at Purdue. This work will be carried out in collaboration with Purdue's Birck Nanotechnology Center. |


Comments
Cesar on 04/11/2007 at 9:55 AM
1
louppl72001 on 04/11/2007 at 10:55 AM
1
martwill38 on 04/11/2007 at 1:14 PM
2
Present stealth mechanisms work mainly by absorption and reflection at odd angles not likely to be received by the radar transmitter.
Aiden! on 04/13/2007 at 1:10 AM
2
montezuma2004 on 04/11/2007 at 5:07 PM
2
swordfishdata on 04/12/2007 at 6:12 PM
7
McMillan968 on 04/11/2007 at 8:25 PM
38
But we are definitely in a period of tech going ahead of what we are ready for,hope it stays that way too!!!
fixerdave on 04/12/2007 at 8:00 PM
5
On the other hand, sometimes, stuff just comes from the lab, stuff that nobody ever thought of before. I wonder if anyone has done acceptance studies comparing how populations deal with art-imagined verses "straight from the lab" generated technology. Now, that would be interesting.
Now, could you imagine some kind of cooling device based on this technology? Something that could radiate infrared but not absorb it, even on a sunny day. Art has prepared us for disappearing ships or people, not better air conditioners.
centaur8 on 01/03/2008 at 10:05 AM
3
netskip on 04/11/2007 at 12:41 PM
2
beemarao on 04/12/2007 at 6:46 AM
1
light ray falling one side of the object should be reproduced on the other side of the object, using a system capable of light sensing and emitting, maintaining that properties of the ray like wawelength,intensity,diretion by doing this we can see through the object that means the object is invisible.
tharas bulpa
brunascle on 04/12/2007 at 9:25 AM
Web Developer
69
that's not really possible, as far as i know.
zifos on 04/12/2007 at 5:18 PM
11
sman on 04/16/2007 at 3:02 AM
11
www.browsetoknow.blogspot.com
Dr. Spook on 08/11/2007 at 11:02 PM
1
Also, why does every fictional Invisible Man end up miserable? Hell, there are too opportunities for fun, hunting down bad guys or just being able to walk about, undetected and mess with people. That would never get old.
Dr. Spook
cloakingdevice on 04/17/2008 at 3:31 AM
1
you can learn more here...
http://invisibility.research.googlepages.com/
http://techon.nikkeibp.co.jp/article/NEWS/20080416/150549/?ST=nano