Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

Wednesday, January 17, 2007

A Nano Solution to Increasing Bandwidth

MIT researchers develop microphotonic devices for communications, clearing the way for higher-performance optical networks.

By Kevin Bullis

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon
Researchers at MIT have developed a new device that will improve communications. Fiber optics cause random polarizations of light that can lead to weakened or garbled signals. The new structure makes all incoming light one polarization before the data is processed.
Credit: Tymon Barwicz

Optical fibers can quickly transmit huge amounts of data. But the technology for sorting and sending photons lags far behind the microelectronics that generate and process the data, putting a crimp on bandwidths. Now researchers at MIT's Research Laboratory of Electronics report in the current issue of Nature Photonics that they have developed a method for overcoming a fundamental problem in using photonics in communications, paving the way to cheaper, more complex, and higher-performance optical networks.

In the past few years, scientists and engineers have made great strides in miniaturizing photonic devices and integrating them onto a single chip--advances that allow for cheaper manufacturing, smaller sizes, and higher performance. Along the way they've developed techniques for working with materials common to the semiconductor industry, which is a step toward integrating photonics and electronics on the same chip. And these researchers have made structures with phenomenal precision, in some cases down to distances smaller than those that separate atoms.

Even with these successes, however, a major obstacle remained. Light delivered via cylindrical fiber optics breaks into different polarizations, or orientations of light waves. In devices at the microscale, the outputs change depending on if the waves are oriented vertically or horizontally so they're suited to processing only certain polarizations, which can lead to weakened signals. If researchers are limited to using horizontally polarized light, for example, they end up throwing away vertically polarized light and lose half the signal strength. That's a problem particularly when sending signals over long distances, such as between continents.

One approach to this problem is to run light through more than one device, each specifically designed to process one polarization. But researchers at MIT's Research Laboratory of Electronics took a different approach. Rather than building separate devices for different light polarizations, they invented a device for converting vertically polarized light into horizontally polarized light. First, the device splits light into its horizontally and vertically polarized components, directing these into separate channels. Then it gradually rotates the vertically polarized light to make it horizontal. At this point, the light in both channels has the same polarization. This makes it possible to use identical devices to process that light. As a result, all of the light is processed in the same way, allowing clear, strong signals.

The current advance pertains only to those photonic applications that involve light with multiple polarizations--mainly communications applications that involve fiber optics. There hasn't been much economic pressure in the past couple of years to develop technology for these applications because of a glut in bandwidth, but now communications demands are increasing again, says Erich Ippen, professor of electrical engineering and physics at MIT and one of the researchers on the project.

"When you integrate things like this, the complexity and the performance of the kinds of filtering we can do are a little more advanced than the methods that are used today," Ippen says. And that, he says, will make it possible to meet the demands of next-generation telecommunications.

Comments

  • Nano?
    RDKmechE on 01/17/2007 at 5:18 PM
    Posts:
    1
    An interesting article but what does this have to do with nanotechnology?
    Rate this comment: 12345
    • Re: Nano?
      Kevin Bullis2 on 01/17/2007 at 7:28 PM
      Posts:
      3
      It depends on the definition of nano you're working with.  It's not nanotech by some definitions, but the dimensions of the waveguides and photonic structures are nanoscale.
      Rate this comment: 12345
    • Re: Nano?
      tymon on 01/18/2007 at 3:04 PM
      Posts:
      2
      The smallest feature size is 80 nm and the on-chip relative control on key critical dimensions is better than 0.15 nm.
      Rate this comment: 12345
  • Polarization Sensitivity Challenge
    tymon on 01/18/2007 at 3:01 PM
    Posts:
    2
    The challenge with sensitivity to polarization of microphotonic devices is even greater than an average 3dB loss in power. In fact, the polarization state (orientation of light) in a fiber changes randomly with time. Hence, if one operates on a single polarization, the signal strength will change randomly with time and even completely disappear in some instances. This results in unacceptable unreliability of the system and makes such polarization sensitive devices unusable.
    Rate this comment: 12345
    • Re: Polarization Sensitivity Challenge
      RobertJCrowley on 10/28/2007 at 12:11 PM
      Posts:
      2
      The typical worst case is a perfect cross polarization which usually results in about 20dB loss. At other angles the 3dB figure stated in the article is typical. This is true for free space EM as well as IR/VIS systems. An interesting example of this is our polarized nanotube array on Si system that is used as a direct optical demux.  The orientation of the array is intentionally set to be angled in and above plane vs the incoming wavefront, so that cross polarization is nearly impossible. The tradeoff is that 3dB loss is the typical condition, but it is not a bad one.

      see http://www.ambitcorp.com for a look.
      Rate this comment: 12345
    • Re: Polarization Sensitivity Challenge
      RobertJCrowley on 10/28/2007 at 12:15 PM
      Posts:
      2
      The typical worst case is a perfect cross polarization which usually results in about 20dB loss. At other angles the the 3dB figure stated in the article is typical. This is true for free space EM as well as IR/VIS systems. An interesting example of this is our polarized nanotube array on Si system that is used as a direct optical demux.  The orientation of the array is intentionally set to be angled in and above plane vs the incoming wavefront, so that cross polarization is nearly impossible. The tradeoff is that 3dB loss is the typical condition, but it is not a bad one.

      see http://www.ambitcorp.com for a look.
      Rate this comment: 12345
Advertisement

Current Issue

Technology Review November/December 2008
Sun + Water = Fuel
An MIT chemist has opened the way to making hydrogen fuel from water using sunlight.
•  Subscribe
Save 41%
•  Table of Contents
•  MIT News

Magazine Services

Career Resources

MIT Technology Insider

Stories and breaking news from inside MIT about the latest research, innovations, and startups--in a convenient monthly e-newsletter. Subscribe today
Advertisement

Follow us on Twitter

Twitter

Get Technology Review updates via the web, cellphone, or Instant Messager – Follow techreview on Twitter!

Advertisement

More Technology News from Forbes

Advertisement
Advertisement
TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES
Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology