An Alternative to your AlternatorNew thermophotovoltaic materials could replace alternators in cars and save fuel.
Researchers at MIT are developing new technology for converting heat into light and then into electricity that could eventually save fuel in vehicles by replacing less-efficient alternators and allowing electrical systems to run without the engine idling.
The technology, called thermophotovoltaics, uses gasoline to heat a light-emitting material, in this case tungsten. A photovoltaic cell then converts the light into electricity. The idea has been around since the 1960s, says John Kassakian, MIT electrical engineering and computer science professor. But until now, the light emitters for the photovoltaics produced inefficient and very costly systems. Improvements in the materials used in these latest devices -- possible in part because researchers can modify the material structure at the nanoscale -- are now making much more efficient systems, Kassakian says. According to Kassakian, the system could potentially be a more efficient way to power electrical systems in a vehicle than the current alternator-based one, which wastes energy in two stages: the internal combustion engine converts only about 30 percent of the energy in fuel into movement, and then the alternator is only 50 percent efficient in converting the mechanical energy into electricity. He says a small prototype thermophotovoltaics device that could confirm the system's improved efficiency might be ready in a year. The researchers modified the surface structure of the light emitter, etching into it nano-sized pits to tune the wavelengths of light emitted to precisely those a photovoltaic cell can convert most efficiently into electricity. They further refined the device with the use of filters that allow the desired wavelengths of light to pass through to the photovoltaic cells, but reflect other wavelengths back to the light emitter. The reflected light carries energy that helps keep the emitter hot, reducing the amount of fuel needed. In addition to replacing the alternator with a thermophotovoltaic module, says Kassakian, the technology could be part of an air-conditioning system for vehicles that doesn't require a compressor. Because this would significantly decrease the load on an engine, it could make it possible to turn off the engine when the vehicle stops in traffic and easily restart it. Today's hybrids use this technique to save gas, but require large batteries to provide electricity for the radio and lights, and to restart the engine, and they have to turn the engine back on when the battery charge runs out. In the new MIT system, these batteries wouldn't be necessary.
|
Better Thermal Photovoltaics
01/21/2009










Comments
06/01/2006
Posts:1
06/30/2006
Posts:1
06/01/2006
Posts:1
similar to that described in the article. A typical alternator puts out something like 1 kw. Not sure
how much heat a typical engine puts
out(radiated plut the exhaust heat) but it has to be in the range of at least 10 times that much so the device would not have to be very efficient. However, it would have
to operate in the presence of pretty high temperatures.
06/01/2006
Posts:1
06/01/2006
Posts:1
06/01/2006
Posts:1
06/01/2006
Posts:1
06/01/2006
Posts:1
I wonder if their reseach could aide the MIT crew?
lbl.gov/Science-Articles/Archive/MSD-full-spectrum-solar-cell.html
I also think they overlook something simple as well the thermal imager the technology behind that turns heat into visible light as well.
Of course this is just a thought.
If enough of scientist come together they can make the difference.
N~K
06/10/2006
Posts:1
makes and markets them,, LFM
06/07/2006
Posts:1
06/01/2006
Posts:1
06/02/2006
Posts:1
06/01/2006
Posts:1
06/01/2006
Posts:1
06/01/2006
Posts:1
06/01/2006
Posts:1
jemd@wcvt.com
06/01/2006
Posts:1
I've lost count of the number of times I've read about some great new idea only to see that sentence or a variation of it at the end of the story. Another tease!
Here's some ideas: stop having so many babies and ride a bicycle.
06/02/2006
Posts:1
06/06/2006
Posts:1
06/02/2006
Posts:1
06/07/2006
Posts:1
06/15/2006
Posts:1
I would think you'd get better efficiences by skipping the light conversion. Great research though. Any improvement is good improvement.
06/02/2006
Posts:1
06/06/2006
Posts:1
06/06/2006
Posts:1
Gr.
Ixe
08/20/2006
Posts:1
06/02/2006
Posts:1
06/05/2006
Posts:1
06/06/2006
Posts:1
06/06/2006
Posts:1
08/04/2006
Posts:1
08/04/2006
Posts:1
leel6391
10/28/2007
Posts:1