Technology Review - Published By MIT
Log in to My.TechnologyReview.com | Register
Advertisement
[1] 2 Next »

Monday, November 07, 2005

Are Nanotubes Safe?

Researchers at Rice University find a way to make the nanoparticles less toxic.

By Kevin Bullis

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon

Nanoparticles are prized for their unique electronic and biological properties. Their size allows them to slip through biological barriers, to deliver drugs to cancer cells, for example.

But researchers and advocacy groups are concerned that these same features may make nanoparticles dangerous in some applications, allowing them to infiltrate and damage healthy cells.

Now a growing number of research groups are trying to get a handle on how these novel structures interact with biology, so that scientists can take advantage of their great promise without unwittingly causing harm.

As findings from studies start to come in, an intriguing -- and more complex -- possibility is emerging: researchers may be able to regulate the toxicity of nanoparticles, allowing them to be more toxic, for instance, if the goal is to kill cancer cells, or less toxic for drug delivery or imaging applications.

The most recent study concerning this ability, which is due to appear in an upcoming issue of Toxicology Letters, suggests that the more researcher modify the surfaces of carbon nanotubes, the less toxic they become.

"Nanotechnology is a tool. It can be beneficial but also disastrous. We need to be careful, and we need to understand nanoparticles before we use them," says Chang-Yu Wu of the University of Florida, Gainesville, co-author of a recent review article on the environmental impact of nanoparticles.

Some scientists worry that because nanoparticles can have significantly different properties than bulk materials, they could exhibit unanticipated dangers. For example, Wu notes that, although ordinary gold is normally safe for use in biological applications, some gold nanoparticles kill bacteria. Also, nanoparticles can slip past the blood-brain barrier into the brain -- a characteristic that could be bad or good, depending on the particle, Wu says.

In the current study, researchers at Rice University were able to change the toxicity of carbon nanotubes by using some of the precise chemistry that has made nanotechnology possible. They attached chemical groups to the outside of the nanotubes, which are cylindrical cages of carbon atoms, resembling rolled-up chicken wire. These chemical groups make the tubes more soluble, which is an important feature if they are to be used inside the watery environment of the body. The researchers found that the nanotubes most modified in this way also killed the fewest cells in a culture. They were so safe, in fact, that no more of the cells exposed to these tubes died than those that died when exposed to a control solution without nanotubes.


"The study sounds encouraging," says Pat Roy Mooney, Executive Director of the ETC Group, an organization that opposes the current use of some nanoparticles in consumer products, such as sunscreen, saying the particles should be fully tested first. Although the Rice results are promising, Mooney emphasizes that "we need a lot more studies" to understand the potential dangers of nanoparticles.

[1] 2 Next »

Comments

  • Please see these links
    Guest (Shahrokh) on 11/07/2005 at 10:24 AM
    Posts:
    1
    Dear Readers:
    Please see these links:
    http://www.upi.com/Hi-Tech/view.php?StoryID=20051020-065616-5065r
    http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2005-10/ru-snp100405.php
    Rate this comment: 12345
  • Please see these links
    Guest (Shahrokh) on 11/07/2005 at 10:24 AM
    Posts:
    1
    Dear Readers:
    Please see these links:
    http://www.upi.com/Hi-Tech/view.php?StoryID=20051020-065616-5065r
    http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2005-10/ru-snp100405.php
    Rate this comment: 12345
  • Some say the world will end by nuclear war, but I say it will end from buckyballs.
    Guest (Louie In Seattle) on 12/31/2005 at 1:57 PM
    Posts:
    1
    Those who fear destruction of the world from nuclear bombs or plant meltdowns can finally put their worries to rest.  The human race will be destroyed by whoever first uses buckyballs and nanotubes in the fast-approaching World War III, which will be fought for control of energy, water, and their product: food.
    Rate this comment: 12345
  • Some say the world will end by nuclear war, but I say it will end from buckyballs.
    Guest (Louie In Seattle) on 12/31/2005 at 1:57 PM
    Posts:
    1
    Those who fear destruction of the world from nuclear bombs or plant meltdowns can finally put their worries to rest.  The human race will be destroyed by whoever first uses buckyballs and nanotubes in the fast-approaching World War III, which will be fought for control of energy, water, and their product: food.
    Rate this comment: 12345
Advertisement

Current Issue

Technology Review September/October 2008
How Obama Really Did It
Social technology helped bring him to the brink of the presidency.
•  Subscribe
Save 41%
•  Table of Contents
•  MIT News

Magazine Services

Career Resources

MIT Technology Insider

Stories and breaking news from inside MIT about the latest research, innovations, and startups--in a convenient monthly e-newsletter. Subscribe today

Follow us on Twitter

Twitter

Get Technology Review updates via the web, cellphone, or Instant Messager – Follow techreview on Twitter!

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES
Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology