|
Monday, February 13, 2006 The Ultra BatteryA new type of ultracapacitor could eventually have you throwing out your conventional batteries. By Kevin Bullis
A breakthrough technology is holding forth the promise of charging electronic gadgets in minutes, never having to replace a battery again, and dropping the cost of hybrid cars. Indeed, the technology has the potential to provide an energy storage device ten times more powerful than even the latest batteries in hybrid cars -- while outliving the vehicle itself. The new technology, developed at MIT's Laboratory for Electromagnetic and Electronic Systems, should improve ultracapacitors by swapping in carbon nanotubes, thereby greatly increasing the surface area of electrodes and the ability to store energy. Ultracapacitors, a souped-up version of the capacitors widely used in electronics, have been around for decades. They're well-known for being powerful, that is, able to quickly absorb and release electricity. But they can't store much energy so their stored electricity is depleted in a matter of seconds. As a result, they've been limited to niche applications, such as providing quick bursts of power in some hybrid transit buses. Now researchers at MIT have found what they believe is a way to improve the endurance of ultracapacitors several-fold -- allowing the devices to retain the power and longevity advantages, while storing about as much energy as the batteries used in hybrids. The amount of energy ultracapacitors can hold is related to the surface area and conductivity of their electrodes. The researchers have increased surface area by "more than an order of magnitude" by using carbon nanotubes, says Joel Schindall, professor of electrical engineering at MIT and one of the researchers on the project. One square centimeter of conductive plate when coated with the nanotubes has a surface area of about 50,000 square centimeters, compared with 2,000 square centimeters using the carbon in a commercial ultracapacitor today. The highly pure carbon nanotubes are also extremely conductive, which should increase power output over existing ultracapacitors, the researchers say. The technology may find applications beyond hybrids, too. Ultracapacitors could allow laptops and cell phones to be charged in a minute. And unlike laptop batteries, which start losing their ability to hold a charge after a year or two, they could still be going strong long after the device is obsolete. "Theoretically, there's no process that would cause the [ultracapacitor] to need to be replaced," says professor John Kassakian, another of the researchers. The main hurdle the new technology is likely to face is not technical but economic. "The nanomaterials are probably a hundred or a thousand times more expensive, today, than the materials that we use," says Michael Sund, spokesperson at Maxwell Technologies, San Diego CA, a maker of commercial ultracapacitors. "The markets that we serve are price-enabled. If our product stored a hundred times more energy, but cost a hundred times more, there might not be any market for it." However, the MIT researchers hope that over time, and with help from economies of scale, nanotube ultracapacitors can be made for the same cost as batteries. The next step is to measure the performance of a device using the carbon nanotubes and to grow the nanomaterials on a flexible substrate that can be rolled into a large-scale ultracapacitor. |

Comments
Guest (Mike Temple) on 02/13/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
Guest (kitk) on 02/13/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
Guest (paul) on 02/13/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
perhaps the thought of people charging their cars for free from the sun has auto manufacturers scared.
Guest (ron rubin) on 02/13/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
Guest (Paul Chernoch) on 02/13/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
Guest (Jeff) on 02/13/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
Guest (Shultz) on 02/13/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
Guest (Tim) on 02/13/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
If you can store electricity you can make their own when possible. Even if 20% of the people who could put in wind or solar did so that would create a great amount of freed up electricity.
Produce the electricity closer to where you use it and forget the long distance transmission loses. Quebec must be nervous right now.
Guest (ken jones) on 07/28/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
esanon on 06/24/2008 at 9:02 AM
1
Guest (Vince) on 02/13/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
All depends how energy dense this new battery is. Think 'jump drive' Vs old 'commodore tape drive'!
Guest (CatoTheElderII) on 02/13/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
Guest (Rob) on 02/13/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
Guest (John) on 02/22/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
Guest (steve) on 08/02/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
Guest (cliff) on 02/13/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
wait till cheap larger scale (houshold size) energy storage becomes available- goodby utilities
politics will hinder no doubt.
Guest (MD) on 02/13/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
Woof!
Guest (cliff) on 02/13/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
Guest (AKohler) on 02/13/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
Guest (Rob) on 02/13/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
Guest (Dave v.) on 02/13/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
Guest (me) on 02/14/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
Guest (bill) on 02/17/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
Guest (Keith) on 07/29/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
Guest (Keith) on 07/29/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
Guest (o) on 02/13/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
F##K NANOTECH, F##K IT RIGHT IN THE EAR--F##K IT IN THE ###HOLE--F##K IT IN THE ANAL RECTUM OF A CAVITY.
F##K NANOTECH.
Guest (RemyC) on 02/13/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
Guest (Blind-Summit) on 02/13/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
Think about your comments before writing such crap. I think this research has the potential to do a lot of good things!
Guest (RexF) on 02/13/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
Guest (nanoguru) on 02/23/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
things could get cheaper truely with more research!!
no point in f##king nanotech!!
a good lot might happen if u f##ked ur nasty ,ill informed hole!!!!!!
Guest (Rick) on 02/13/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
Guest (cliff) on 02/13/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
don't be to caught up. enjoy the idea. details are surmountable.
Guest (Tim) on 02/13/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
Guest (Rob) on 02/13/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
BTW, you now drive around with the equivalent of over 100 sticks of dynamite.
Guest (Rob) on 02/13/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
Guest (DVB) on 02/13/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
Guest (Richard Samuel) on 02/13/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
Guest (Gosuckabee) on 02/14/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
Seriously, take an english class or something.
Guest (Tr editor) on 02/14/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
Guest (Sean) on 02/18/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
Guest (srinivas) on 02/23/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
but it will be so only when we have the basics__the nanotubes and easier methods to make the nanotubes__economical and eco-friendly!!!
no point in robbing jack to pay
jill!!or something like that!!!!
so it is more important to first stick to basics and once everything is ready we can have the revolution!!!
Guest (V) on 02/14/2006 at 12:00 AM
1
no, that would be the petro industry blockading that door.
Guest (Cory) on 03/02/2006 at 12:00 AM
1