Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

Search Engines' Chinese Self-Censorship

U.S.-based search engines are choosing what they censor in China and could be blocking more than they have to.

By Erica Naone

Monday, June 30, 2008

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon

To operate in China, search engine companies based in the United States have built products that cooperate with China's policies of Internet censorship. That much has long been recognized. But a new analysis suggests that search companies, including Google, Microsoft, and Yahoo, are independently deciding what to censor and could be censoring more information than Chinese laws demand.

Credit: Technology Review

A report released last week by the Citizen Lab at the Munk Centre for International Studies at the University of Toronto found that different search engines are blocking fairly different content. "The low overlap means that companies are choosing the exact content to censor or, alternatively, to not censor," says Nart Villeneuve, a senior research fellow at the Citizen Lab and the author of the report. "That doesn't mean that they're not getting guidance from the Chinese government in other ways," he notes. But Villeneuve says that if search engines are interpreting Chinese policies to decide what to censor, that introduces the possibility that they may block more content than is strictly necessary.

The U.S. search engine companies say that they cooperate with Chinese censorship policies because some presence in the country is better than none at all. "We started Google.cn because Google.com was strangled in China," says Robert Boorstin, director of policy communications for Google. Though Boorstin says he can't comment on the specifics of Google's Chinese product, he says, "We were faced with a very clear choice: we can either start a new public library where people could see 98 percent of the stuff in the stacks, or we would have no library at all, and nobody would get a library card."

Story continues below

Indeed, according to Villeneuve's report, even with the self-censoring, foreign search engines provide about 20 percent more content on average than Internet users in China would otherwise be able to access through domestic search engines. But, he says, "The bigger issue is just that we don't know exactly what they're doing, and the search engine companies haven't been open publicly about what they're doing."

Villeneuve tested search engines made by Google, Microsoft, Yahoo, and Beijing-based Baidu. To make the testing fair, Villeneuve compared how the search engines handled specific keywords on specific sites--say, "Tiananmen Square" at news.bbc.co.uk. He also had to distinguish the effects of China's "Great Firewall," which blocks some information passing into or out of China, from the censorship of specific search engines. Since Yahoo and Baidu both host their Chinese products within China, their crawlers can index Chinese content without the firewall's interference. Users outside China, however, will see their results filtered. With Google and Microsoft, the situation is reversed. So Villeneuve tested Yahoo and Baidu from within China and Google and Microsoft from outside, avoiding the firewall.

Comments

  • Sellouts and traitors of democracies.
    During the early stages of globalization, there was this view that globalization will be beneficial, because it will open up dictatorial societies and make the world a better place.

    Now we see, that we were naive. The spread of influence in a globalized world can go both ways, that is dictatorial societies can promote their iniquitous systems just as well. Instead of spreading freedom and openness, all kinds of restrictions and censorship could spread to formerly free communities. This first happens overseas, but there is no real guarantee that this plague won't spread to Western countries.

    As proven by the China experience, the multinational companies have no moral compass whatsoever, except their quarterly returns. If they can make a few extra bucks by selling out human rights, they will do so without batting an eyelash.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    gabrielg01
    07/01/2008
    Posts:361
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
  • time for change
    The Internet should be a medium for the freedom of expression, not repression.

    Internet censorship helps the Chinese authorities to hide the true extent of human rights abuses - like their use of the death penalty, torture and detention without trial and the persecution of human rights defenders.

    Sign Amnesty International Australia's anti-censorship pledge - http://action.uncensor.com.au/pledge/
    Rate this comment: 12345

    kimbatch
    07/02/2008
    Posts:1
    Avg Rating:
    4/5
    • Re: time for change
      Today there was a piece in the NY Times explaining how American torture practices have been adopted from communist China:
      "China Inspired Interrogations at Guantánamo" Just Google it, and you shall find it.

      This is a clear example of how democracies can be weakened and corrupted in our globalized world.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      gabrielg01
      07/02/2008
      Posts:361
      Avg Rating:
      3/5

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement
Technology Review July/August 2009

Current Issue

Search Me
Inside the launch of Stephen Wolfram’s new “computational knowledge engine.”
•  Subscribe
Save 41%
•  Table of Contents
•  MIT News
Advertisement

Follow us on Twitter

Twitter

Get Technology Review updates via the web, cellphone, or Instant Messager – Follow techreview on Twitter!

Advertisement
Subscribe to Technology Review's daily e-mail update. Enter your e-mail address

Advertisement
TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES

More Technology News from Forbes

Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology © 2009 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.