Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

A Faster, More Energy-Efficient GPS

Continued from page 1

By Kate Greene

Friday, May 16, 2008

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon

Geotate's approach is a redesign of the system that loses the processor. Instead, the hardware simply captures a small sample--200 milliseconds worth--of satellite orbit information and it stores it in memory. When a person uploads her pictures to a computer, the accompanying GPS data is used to calculate location information by employing the computer's processor and by querying Geotate's database of historic satellite positioning. The process requires only 10 millijoules of energy at the time the picture is taken, says Geotate's Marshall, which is about one-hundredth of the energy used in a traditional GPS system.

While the company doesn't provide any specific hardware, it is working with personal electronics companies to incorporate the approach in cameras. But ultimately, Geotate's product is the GPS processing software and the database used to locate the satellites after the fact. Marshall says that he expects Capture and Process add-ons for cameras to be available by the end of the year.

Bayen suspects that geotagging photos and other objects will start to be more popular in the coming years as people get more used to location-based services and location-aware devices such as the iPhone. It's unclear if Geotate's approach will be widely adopted in the industry, but it is approaching the industry wisely by attempting to solve energy-efficiency problems. In order to get more people to geotag their photos, says Bayen, the location technology needs to not drain the battery.


Tags

GPS

Comments

  • On mobile phones it has been happening since ages
    No doubt saving CPU power will save battery but nothing new with geotagging - since 2005 this one here has been doing the job
    http://www.handango.com/PlatformProductDetail.jsp?productType=2&productId=159297
    Rate this comment: 12345

    randhawp
    05/16/2008
    Posts:2
    Avg Rating:
    5/5
  • [no subject]
    Seems like it should be called Capture and Don't Process.

    I'd be interested to know how many bits have to be captured and stored to allow computing the fix later.  Is the device capturing 200 ms for each of 4 satellites?  Is it able to do this sequentially, or is it necessary to capture the 4 streams at the same instant?
    Rate this comment: 12345

    PeterCapek
    10/02/2008
    Posts:1

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement
Technology Review July/August 2009

Current Issue

Search Me
Inside the launch of Stephen Wolfram’s new “computational knowledge engine.”
•  Subscribe
Save 41%
•  Table of Contents
•  MIT News
Advertisement

Follow us on Twitter

Twitter

Get Technology Review updates via the web, cellphone, or Instant Messager – Follow techreview on Twitter!

Advertisement
Subscribe to Technology Review's daily e-mail update. Enter your e-mail address

Advertisement
TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES

More Technology News from Forbes

Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology © 2009 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.