|
Tuesday, March 25, 2008 Weather Engineering in ChinaHow the Chinese plan to modify the weather in Beijing during the Olympics, using supercomputers and artillery. By Mark Williams
To prevent rain over the roofless 91,000-seat Olympic stadium that Beijing natives have nicknamed the Bird's Nest, the city's branch of the national Weather Modification Office--itself a department of the larger China Meteorological Administration--has prepared a three-stage program for the 2008 Olympics this August. First, Beijing's Weather Modification Office will track the region's weather via satellites, planes, radar, and an IBM p575 supercomputer, purchased from Big Blue last year, that executes 9.8 trillion floating point operations per second. It models an area of 44,000 square kilometers (17,000 square miles) accurately enough to generate hourly forecasts for each kilometer. Then, using their two aircraft and an array of twenty artillery and rocket-launch sites around Beijing, the city's weather engineers will shoot and spray silver iodide and dry ice into incoming clouds that are still far enough away that their rain can be flushed out before they reach the stadium. Finally, any rain-heavy clouds that near the Bird's Nest will be seeded with chemicals to shrink droplets so that rain won't fall until those clouds have passed over. Zhang Qian, head of Beijing's Weather Modification Office, explains, "We use a coolant made from liquid nitrogen to increase the number of droplets while decreasing their average size. As a result, the smaller droplets are less likely to fall, and precipitation can be reduced." August is part of Northeast Asia's rainy season; chances of precipitation over Beijing on any day that month will approach 50 percent. Still, while tests with clouds bearing heavy rain loads haven't always been successful, Qian claims that "the results with light rain have been satisfactory." Modifying the weather may seem a hubristic exercise. But arguably, given what else the Chinese have already invested to make this year's Olympics a showcase for China's emergence as a 21st-century superpower, it's almost the least they could do. Following the announcement in 2001 that the 2008 Games had been awarded to Beijing, the government of the People's Republic initiated $40 billion of new construction there, bringing 120,000 Chinese migrant workers into the city (at about $130 each a month) and triggering a five-year steel shortage worldwide. Today, Beijing boasts, alongside the vast Bird's Nest, megastructures like a new airport terminal that on its own is bigger than any airport elsewhere in the world. One measure of the city's transformation is that today 300 or so new towers, some designed by the most avant-garde architects on the planet, rise where a few short years ago there were only siheyuans (traditional Chinese courtyard residences) interspersed with bland 1950s-era boxes in the Sino-Soviet style. Equally, though, the Geneva-based Centre on Housing Rights and Evictions estimates that 1.5 million of Beijing's natives will have been displaced from their homes by government edict when the Olympics finally begins. This preemptory modernization is of a piece with China's scale, its 1.32 billion population, and the authoritarian control exerted by its Communist central government, which nowadays is dominated by technocrats and engineers who favor mega-projects like the world's largest dam (the Three Gorges dam over the Yangtze River), its highest railway (the Qinghai-Tibet line), and even its biggest Ferris wheel (in Beijing, opening in 2009). Unsurprisingly, therefore, China's national weather-engineering program is also the world's largest, with approximately 1,500 weather modification professionals directing 30 aircraft and their crews, as well as 37,000 part-time workers--mostly peasant farmers--who are on call to blast away at clouds with 7,113 anti-aircraft guns and 4,991 rocket launchers. |


Comments
zig158 on 03/25/2008 at 5:44 AM
34
To give you an idea how many people 50,000,000 really is, it’s 1 person per second for over a year and a half. Their recent actions in Tibet really show how much they have changed don’t they?
DJTal on 03/25/2008 at 10:58 AM
108
kanghaiyang on 03/25/2008 at 11:49 PM
1
polo90 on 03/28/2008 at 12:25 PM
1
Have a problem with my number? I don't believe in yours either.
johnalphonse on 03/25/2008 at 9:46 AM
31
neotheologian on 03/27/2008 at 11:42 AM
3
ReEvolveD on 03/28/2008 at 2:42 PM
2
sorgfelt on 03/25/2008 at 10:21 AM
5
2. They are changing the weather in a fairly limited area for a short period of time.
johnalphonse on 03/25/2008 at 2:01 PM
31
garyvannest on 03/27/2008 at 10:15 AM
2
frumblefoot on 03/27/2008 at 10:59 AM
5
what exactly is your point???
this article should be read in a careful way otherwise it's extremely misleading and biased, for what???
lasertekk on 03/25/2008 at 10:55 AM
16
frumblefoot on 03/27/2008 at 11:00 AM
5
RD on 03/25/2008 at 12:15 PM
47
garyvannest on 03/27/2008 at 10:25 AM
2
Pollen: MAY cause hay fever.
Egg: MAY cause coronary heart disease
Eat too much: MAY cause death
Drink too much: MAY cause death
Driving: MAY cause accident
...
How wonderful the MAY is.
frumblefoot on 03/27/2008 at 11:02 AM
5
what are you trying to exaggerate?
ryce on 03/28/2008 at 12:46 AM
4
mkogrady on 03/25/2008 at 12:23 PM
64
If yes - would something like this cause problems for other nations - ie drought, excessive rainfall or snow, increased or decreased temps etc?
frumblefoot on 03/27/2008 at 11:27 AM
5
stop being naive on things and googgling silver iodize, you think they really did it without having googled it first? Well I becha they didn't since they probably have some of the top scientist did quite a bit research on it for years first.
Some of you people should make sense of yourself first before you yell.
neotheologian on 03/27/2008 at 11:41 AM
3
zig158 on 03/26/2008 at 2:13 AM
34
As for Kanghaiyang’s question, yes I have checked into that and you can too. A good place to start would be
http://mises.org/story/2652
this article summarizes what you will find else ware if you choose to look deeper.
Weather control is a Pandora’s box that is best left unopened. A bit late for that I suppose.
lathiatmit on 03/27/2008 at 2:21 AM
1
janissary_88 on 03/27/2008 at 12:51 PM
2
Of course, this article is talking about the modern Party's monomaniacal focus on the Olympics and the dubious merits of weather control tech, not the wars and chaos of the 60s and 70s, so I'm not entirely certain what folk were meaning to accomplish in terms of creating constructive dialogue by bringing up those casualty figures in the first place.
Shiladie on 03/26/2008 at 11:59 AM
23
I think this is a great step that I'm glad the chinese are willing to take. Hopefully this leads to more technologies along this line, allowing for more manufactured weather worldwide.
I expected less technophobia then i'm seeing on the above comments from people on this site...
Michaelmas on 03/26/2008 at 1:32 PM
1
In fact, if you fly over Northern China's landscape, you can look down and see a countryside in which -- like large areas of the American Midwest -- there's a human habitation every half-mile or so. However, unlike the Midwest, it'll not be a single family residence or farmhouse, but a whole village of one or two-hundred people.
Overall, two-thirds of China is more or less non-arable. That means with a fifth of the world's population to support, China has a base of less arable land of far worse quality than the U.S. -- and where the U.S. has plenty of currently unused land surface it could turn to agricultural purposes, China is already using everything it has.
Beyond that, there's the pollution in China. Downtown Beijing has atmospheric pollution that the WHO reckons is five times more than is healthy for humans.
So expect to see more weather modification and mitigation from the Middle Kingdom. Understand, too, that the Chinese may have a different take on small eco-footprint 'sustainability' than middle-class Western Greens. One reason is that -- as they tend to never let the rest of us forget -- China has the world's oldest continuous culture. Arguably, viewing matters in this historical context, China already 'did' sustainability starting in the 15th century, when it decided not to permit disruptive technologies and to reject industrialization for four centuries. Sustainability in the Western Green style for the Chinese, therefore, is what got them to the population-to-land ration they have now. Thus, it doesn't work.
janissary_88 on 03/27/2008 at 1:00 PM
2
You're right on, though, that the North needs all the help it can get.
neotheologian on 03/27/2008 at 11:38 AM
3
frumblefoot on 03/27/2008 at 2:08 PM
5
1speeder on 03/27/2008 at 11:43 AM
1
maddeng on 04/06/2008 at 5:42 PM
1
The chinese have no intention of controlling the weather.
CONTROLLING
Controlling the weather would entail preventing accumulation from forming or wind patterns carrying accumulation to a certain pattern.
BLOCKING
They are preventing rain that might occur from entering a certain area. They are basicaly going to form a curtain or wall around the area of the stadium.
To say they are controlling the weather we would need to tag that same definition to every building in the world.
ReEvolveD on 04/07/2008 at 7:41 PM
2