|
Tuesday, March 18, 2008 Long-Distance Wi-FiIntel has found a way to stretch a Wi-Fi signal from one antenna to another located more than 60 miles away. By Kate Greene
Intel has announced plans to sell a specialized Wi-Fi platform later this year that can send data from a city to outlying rural areas tens of miles away, connecting sparsely populated villages to the Internet. The wireless technology, called the rural connectivity platform (RCP), will be helpful to computer-equipped students in poor countries, says Jeff Galinovsky, a senior platform manager at Intel. And the data rates are high enough--up to about 6.5 megabits per second--that the connection could be used for video conferencing and telemedicine, he says. The RCP, which essentially consists of a processor, radios, specialized software, and an antenna, is an appealing way to connect remote areas that otherwise would go without the Internet, says Galinovsky. Wireless satellite connections are expensive, he points out. And it's impractical to wire up some villages in Asian and African countries. "You can't lay cable," he says. "It's difficult, expensive, and someone is going to pull it up out of the ground to sell it." Already, Intel has installed and tested the hardware in India, Panama, Vietnam, and South Africa. Later this year, the company will sell the device in India, with a target price below $500. The point-to-point technology will require two nodes, which could provide "full back-end infrastructure" for less than $1,000, Galinovsky says. One node is usually installed at the edge of an urban area, wired to a local-area network cable, he explains. Using a directional antenna, the device shoots data to a receiving antenna as far as 60 miles away. Any farther away, and the system encounters problems due to the curvature of the earth. Practically, most links will be set up less than 30 miles away from one another. Once a node is installed in a village, the connection can be dispersed using standard cables and wireless routers, Galinovsky says. There is nothing particularly innovative in the antenna technology and the router hardware, he says. The trick, he explains, comes in the software that the radios use to communicate with each other. "If you take standard Wi-Fi and focus it," Galinovsky says, "you can't get past a few kilometers." The reason is that one radio will send out data and wait for an acknowledgment from the other radio that the data was received. If the transmitting radio doesn't receive the acknowledgment in a certain amount of time, it will assume that the data was lost, and it will resend it. Intel's RCP platform rewrites the communication rules of Wi-Fi radios. Galinvosky explains that the software creates specific time slots in which each of the two radios listens and talks, so there's no extra data being sent confirming transmissions. "We're not taking up all the bandwidth waiting for acknowledgments," he says. Since there is an inherent trade-off between the amount of available bandwidth and the distance that a signal can travel, the more bandwidth is available, the farther a signal can travel. (See a video with a technical explanation of the RCP here.) Importantly, the devices require relatively little power. Running two or three radios in a link, Galinvosky says, requires about five to six watts. This makes it possible to power the radios using solar energy. The Intel project and forthcoming product "sound like a huge step forward" in terms of usable bandwidth over long-range lengths, says Deborah Estrin, professor of computer science at the University of California, Los Angeles. Estrin develops technology for sensor networks in remote areas that monitor seismic activity, among other things. She says that these sensors are spread out over large areas and need to transmit large amounts of data. Previous low-power, inexpensive wireless communication technologies could only stretch a few kilometers, she says. "What's important is that Intel is getting much longer distances." Galinvosky says that the RCP is alluring to markets beyond India. "We're seeing a lot of interest in the industry," he says. "Every time we talk about this, they say, 'We need this yesterday.'" |
Meraki Outdoor
06/23/2008



Comments
nekote on 03/18/2008 at 8:31 AM
114
http://blogs.intel.com/research/2008/03/rural_connectivity_platform_be.php
Was very helpful.
This web article photo does *NOT* show the point-to-point directional dish antenna, rather just the 2 standard Wi-Fi antennas, giving a mis-leading initial impression.
There are 2 distinct Wi-Fi "networks" - the point-to-point directional long distance link and the more familiar area Wi-Fi Access Point.
Quite a while ago, various "hacker" communities achieved such long distances without even altering the Wi-Fi protocol, using directional parabolic antennas (eg: http://www.usbwifi.orcon.net.nz/)
Would seem even higher bandwidth could be achieved by having full duplex continuous transmissions (using different send / receive frequencies? using 2 separate directional parabolic anntennas, one for send, one for receive?). Of course, there'd be an opportunity to improve the protocol, possibly using some sort of large (MBs?) sliding transmit / acknowledge window that also re-sent individual missed packets ("holes").
demarco on 03/18/2008 at 9:02 PM
3
The true novelty is the introduction of a TDMA-like frame in a CSMA protocol.
I ask myself if this product will host also mesh capabilities. If yes, a true low cost urban mesh network will possible.
makevuy on 03/19/2008 at 2:48 AM
1
On the other hand I don't know if this solution is capable to implement PtMp links in infraestructure mode.
Finally I don't know if will be possible to get quality of service....because this solution only improve the throughput but I don't know if can get differentiation between classes of traffic very important in the case of using VoIP or IP video.
Sandra.
Thanks!
METRA on 03/25/2008 at 4:08 PM
1
Could you please elaborate on the reason why you think this system would be good for mesh WMAN? I'm asking because if this product is capable of a mesh topology setup then it would really come in very handy on a couple of projects I'm working on. I just don't have all the specs on this product just yet.
Thanks
rfwrangler on 03/20/2008 at 3:37 PM
1
wirelesh on 04/03/2008 at 4:10 PM
1
aryawidura on 03/22/2008 at 6:23 AM
1
dslbroadbandwireless on 07/20/2008 at 2:58 PM
1