|
March/April 2008 TR10: Reality MiningSandy Pentland is using data gathered by cell phones to learn about human behavior. By Kate Greene
Every time you use your cell phone, you leave behind a few bits of information. The phone pings the nearest cell-phone towers, revealing its location. Your service provider records the duration of your call and the number dialed. Some people are nervous about trailing digital bread crumbs behind them. Sandy Pentland, however, revels in it. In fact, the MIT professor of media arts and sciences would like to see phones collect even more information about their users, recording everything from their physical activity to their conversational cadences. With the aid of some algorithms, he posits, that information could help us identify things to do or new people to meet. It could also make devices easier to use--for instance, by automatically determining security settings. More significant, cell-phone data could shed light on workplace dynamics and on the well-being of communities. It could even help project the course of disease outbreaks and provide clues about individuals' health. Pentland, who has been sifting data gleaned from mobile devices for a decade, calls the practice "reality mining." Reality mining, he says, "is all about paying attention to patterns in life and using that information to help [with] things like setting privacy patterns, sharing things with people, notifying people--basically, to help you live your life." Researchers have been mining data from the physical world for years, says Alex Kass, a researcher who leads reality-mining projects at Accenture, a consulting and technology services firm. Sensors in manufacturing plants tell operators when equipment is faulty, and cameras on highways monitor traffic flow. But now, he says, "reality mining is getting personal." Within the next few years, Pentland predicts, reality mining will become more common, thanks in part to the proliferation and increasing sophistication of cell phones. Many handheld devices now have the processing power of low-end desktop computers, and they can also collect more varied data, thanks to devices such as GPS chips that track location. And researchers such as Pentland are getting better at making sense of all that information. To create an accurate model of a person's social network, for example, Pentland's team combines a phone's call logs with information about its proximity to other people's devices, which is continuously collected by Bluetooth sensors. With the help of factor analysis, a statistical technique commonly used in the social sciences to explain correlations among multiple variables, the team identifies patterns in the data and translates them into maps of social relationships. Such maps could be used, for instance, to accurately categorize the people in your address book as friends, family members, acquaintances, or coworkers. In turn, this information could be used to automatically establish privacy settings--for instance, allowing only your family to view your schedule. With location data added in, the phone could predict when you would be near someone in your network. In a paper published last May, Pentland and his group showed that cell-phone data enabled them to accurately model the social networks of about 100 MIT students and professors. They could also precisely predict where subjects would meet with members of their networks on any given day of the week. |
Smart Badges Track Human Behavior
01/30/2008




Comments
SirLanse on 02/21/2008 at 8:54 AM
33
Who really benefits from knowing these things?
MrPrez on 02/21/2008 at 2:41 PM
2
notjim on 02/21/2008 at 3:27 PM
1
onepersonsopinion on 03/15/2008 at 7:56 PM
2
If one can predict an individual's behavior, could one then not introduce variables to alter such predicted behavior? Hence, would it not be possible to introduce controls over each of the individuals within the global cellular network?
Over time, would it not be possible to develop an acceptable profile for a each given role within society? Therefore, couldn't acts deemed to be outside acceptable limits of the individual's given role (i.e politically incorrect) create negative repercussions for the individual who performed the act? In other words, could this not lead to an extremely granular system of "sticks" and "carrots?"
How difficult then would it be to extend these limitations to entire populations and/or societies, as once the algorithms are created it is simply data collection and processing horsepower?
So, given the above, I'd like to ask those at MIT, who are implementing this project, if they have asked the funders of this project what their long term plans are for this technology. Who is asking the moral questions? Who is making these long term societal choices?
kcredden on 03/13/2008 at 10:43 PM
1
I was wondering a) would that really work (I've read that one of the biggest problems with forecasting, is there's not enough sensors and data) and b) could you do the same with cell phones? GPS, is in a lot of phones now. That with real-time basic weather data, and a simple date/time code also added to the data packet.
Just an idea. Good magazine, BTW.
- Kc
zig158 on 04/10/2008 at 12:52 AM
45
Two thirds of the world’s population still lives in tyranny.
desolation0 on 04/21/2008 at 4:52 AM
13