The Chinese Solar Machine Layer by Layer Fire in the Library The Mystery Behind Anesthesia
Cutting off communication: Wednesday's fiber cuts occurred about five miles away from Alexandria, killing connections between Europe and Egypt, the Middle East, and India.
Telegeography Research
Multiple fiber cuts to undersea cables show the fragility of the Internet at its choke points.
When the Internet suddenly collapsed early last Wednesday across the Middle East and into India, it provided a stark reminder of how the Net's virtual spaces can still be held hostage to real-world events.
Almost simultaneously, two separate undersea fiber-optic cables connecting Europe with Egypt, and eventually with the Middle East and India, were cut. The precise cause remains unknown: experts initially said that ships' anchors, dragged by stormy weather across the sea floor, were the most likely culprit, but Egyptian authorities have said that no ships were in the region.
Whatever the cause, the effects were immediate. According to its telecommunications ministry, Egypt initially lost 70 percent of its connection to the outside Internet and 30 percent of service to its call-center industry, which depended less on the lines. Between 50 and 60 percent of India's Net outbound connectivity was similarly lost on the westbound route critical to the nation's burgeoning outsourcing industry.
"This [fiber path across the Mediterranean] is a choke point, which until recently was a very lightly trafficked route where there wasn't great need for cable," says Tim Strong, an analyst at telecommunications research firm Telegeography Research. "There are many new cables planned for the region, but as it happens, they're not in service yet."
Undersea cable damage is hardly rare--indeed, more than 50 repair operations were mounted in the Atlantic alone last year, according to marine cable repair company Global Marine Systems. But last week's breaks came at one of the world's bottlenecks, where Net traffic for whole regions is funneled along a single route.
This kind of damage is rarely such a deep concern in the United States and Europe. The Atlantic and Pacific Oceans are crisscrossed so completely with fast fiber networks that a break in one area typically has no significant effect. Net traffic simply uses one of many possible alternate destinations to reach its goal.
Not so with the route connecting Europe to Egypt, and from there to the Middle East. Today, just three major data cables stretch from Italy to Egypt and run down the Suez Canal, and from there to much of the Middle East. (A separate line connects Italy with Israel.) A serious cut here is immediately obvious across the region, and a double cut can be crippling.
The two damaged cables, both cut about five miles north of Alexandria, Egypt, are the most modern of the trio. One, owned by the U.K.-based Flag Telecom, a subsidiary of the India-based Reliance Group, stretches nearly 17,000 miles from Europe to China. The second cable, known as Sea-Me-We 4 and owned by a consortium of 15 different telecommunications companies, stretches from Spain to Singapore. Together, they have a capacity of close to 620 gigabits per second, according to Telegeography Research.
The one remaining cable traversing roughly this route is the older Sea-Me-We 3 cable, which has a capacity of 70 gigabits per second--considerably less than its newer rivals.
A third regional cable, also owned by Flag Telecom, was cut the morning of February 1 off the coast of Dubai, in an apparently unrelated event. This break has caused less trouble, since it is part of a Middle East loop that offers alternative routes for data traffic.
It seems rather crude to me that cables are being used at all. Satellites have been used for communications for so long now, why are such easily damaged items of hardware such as undersea cables even in existence anymore?
Fiber can handle much more bandwidth than satellite.
Fiber cables cam handle massively more data than satellites. Were the internet to rely on satellite technology we would still be living at dial up speeds.
If you use wireless communications, the various NSA collecting stations around the globe will scoop up wholesale amounts of these communications for their spying purposes. This is the reason more and more governments and organizations prefer to have cables. Cables can be hacked too, but it's a lot harder to do so.
Some people would say that these cable accidents were no accidents at all. Maybe some people have an interest to have communications shift towards satellites. Iran suffered the most outage from these cable cuts, and given all the war rhetoric going around...it doesn't take a genius to connect the dots.
Satellites are great for broadcast, mobile, temporary and "thin route" communications but they have far less capacity and cost more than modern fiber cables. Geostationary satellites introduce a delay that many find intolerable. Satellites in low earth orbit could avoid the delay problem, but this requires a large and expensive constellation to provide continuous coverage. Iridium and Globalstar were both financial failures.
Satellites also have their own failure mechanisms. The radio links can be jammed. Earth stations and satellites can both fail, and the latter are hard to repair. They also run out of stationkeeping fuel or just plain wear out and have to be periodically replaced.
Yes, redundancy & multiple paths are important! See this article from The Internet Protocol Journal on internet topology -- especially the parts on network resilience. Some structures are better than others.
Wireless internet by Satellite support as promising solution
Internet future is inclined to favor wireless connection through the support of satellites
as opposed to fiber lines.
As understandable as bandwith accomodation supports existing fiber application, material alteration,especially in satellite composition and design, could overcome any existing disadvantages, on the reasonableness
that, both risk and economic advantages support
wireless internet investment and eliminates any
long term failures, typical of the one in discussion.
Total wireless internet, replacing landline connection, is a dream that seems most
certain than probable.(martin@mpgatechnology.com)
Re: Wireless internet by Satellite support as promising solution
No matter how much you increase the bandwidth of satellite connections, they suffer from an inherent disadvantage - roundtrip latency of 72000 miles with geosynchronous orbits. This automatically precludes a lot of payloads - VoIP, video conferencing etc.
Re: Wireless internet by Satellite support as promising solution
Ha! Without a huge new constellation of low altitude satellites you'll never see it happen.
That is unless you've found a way to increase the speed of light. Current roundtrip latency from earth to satellites and back is almost 1000 milliseconds.
Imagine your ping times. That would all but destroy telephone/VOIP communications, online gaming, etc. Not to mention the incredibly reduced throughput because of the chatty nature of TCP.
A team of successful entrepreneurs credited for www.SelectWealthSystem.com
A new home-based-business marketing system that provides the strategic high ground for internet marketing.
Pro Team Marketing uses an automated marketing system that is currently promoting a cutting-edge young company, entering the early growth stage, that targets the largest consumer base in the United States with their financial educational products.
http://www.SelectWealthSystem.com
Manufacturing in the United States is in trouble. That's bad news not just for the country's economy but for the future of innovation.
Our list of the 50 most innovative companies, including the following:
jwoodside
6 Comments
seafloor variety
How careful are the cable laying companies in where they lay their cables? In my work as marine geophysicist I have come across cables in the most peculiar locations, where geology indicates potential natural risks to the cable. Seafloor is an active environment with considerable variability from one place to another. The Mediterranean certainly has a wide range of seafloor conditions and probably just as high a risk to cables from nature as from man.
Reply
KA9Q
2 Comments
Re: seafloor variety
According to the industry, they carefully plan routes to avoid shipping traffic and as much fishing as possible, and to follow the undersea topology. In shallow water, cables are armored and buried. The companies have detailed maps of where all the other cables are, and they're supposed to cross each other as close to a right angle as possible. They detect other cables by their magnetic fields, and they lift any burial ploughs when crossing them.
How well they actually do all this stuff is another question.
Reply
jwoodside
6 Comments
Re: seafloor variety
I use maps of cable locations when planning seafloor activities like dredging. What I was more curious about was cable company awareness of such active seafloor locations as black smokers and hydrothermal vents on mid ocean ridges or locations prone to large scale sediment slope failures (like on the Nile deep sea fan). We have seen cables in risky locations. I was just looking at a sonar image of a cable crossing directly over the peak (and centre of activity) of a large mud volcano in the Mediterranean.
Reply