Software That Learns from UsersA massive AI project called CALO could revolutionize machine learning.
The thing that makes computers a huge pain for everybody, says Pedro Domingos, an associate professor of computer science at the University of Washington, is that you have to explain to them every little detail of what they need to do. "It's really annoying," Domingos jokes. "They're stupid."
That's why Domingos is taking part in CALO, a massive, four-year-old artificial-intelligence project to help computers understand the intentions of their human users. Funded by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), and coordinated by SRI International, based in Menlo Park, CA, the project brings together researchers from 25 universities and corporations, in many areas of artificial intelligence, including machine learning, natural-language processing, and Semantic Web technologies. Each group works on pieces of CALO, which stands for "cognitive assistant that learns and organizes." Adam Cheyer, program director of the artificial-intelligence center at SRI, explains that CALO tries to assist users in three ways: by helping them manage information about key people and projects, by understanding and organizing information from meetings, and by learning and automating routine tasks. For example, CALO can learn about the people and projects that are important to a user's work life by paying attention to e-mail patterns. It can then categorize and prioritize information for the user, based on the source of the information and the projects to which it is connected. The system can also apply this type of understanding to meetings, using its speech-recognition system to make a transcription of what's said there, and its understanding of the user's projects and contacts to process the transcription intelligently into to-do lists and appointments. Finally, a user can teach CALO routine tasks such as purchasing books online and searching for bed-and-breakfasts that meet specific criteria. CALO can interact with other people, taking on tasks such as scheduling meetings, coordinating among people's schedules, and making decisions, such as deciding to reschedule a meeting if a key member becomes unable to attend.  "It's an amazingly large thing, and it's insanely ambitious," Domingos says. "But if CALO succeeds, it'll be quite a revolution. Even if it doesn't, so much good research is happening under it that it will still have been worthwhile." The goal is to build an artificial intelligence that can serve as a personal assistant for someone--not something with a rigid structure within which it can be helpful, like the animated paper-clip assistant featured in Microsoft Office products, but a system that can learn about a user's environment and needs, and adapt to them, without having to be programmed anew by engineers. "What's different and has never been done before in this way is the truly integrated approach of bringing all of these technologies and all of these capabilities into a single system," says Cheyer. "It takes a system of this size to give you something that can understand and organize so much information." |
E-mail
Audio »
Print
Favorite
Share »
Digg this
Add to del.icio.us
Add to Reddit
Add to Facebook
Slashdot It!
Stumble It!
Add to Newsvine
Add to Connotea
Add to CiteUlike
Add to Furl
Googlize this
Add to Rojo
Add to MyWeb
Semantic Sense for the Desktop
12/16/2008
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Comments
Heck, I'd be happy if MS Word would simply leave me alone to write what I want instead of guessing and suggesting!
fiberman
11/30/2007
Posts:80
No, not much has changed - for now...
Natural intelligence is almost absent due to 'less-than-desirable' factors inherent in modern society.
In the absense of intelligenge comes ignorance and arrogance, both are bad enough on their own, but together they can be absolutely deadly.
And, Brother Bill won't leave us alone. MS is intergrated into almost every system on the planet. We all have the MS blues now. The question now is: Should we do without MS, Computers, or anything associated with them and the oncoming emergence of AI? Can we?
Watcher
12/04/2007
Posts:2
But any approach which tries to simulate any functionality of the brain (learning) should take in to account the nature of forgetting. The way brain forgets over time is one of the main reason for the brain's speed. Its remembering capacity is due to the basis of the frequency of the data usage. Also forgetting is due to not using the data over long time. This helps to throw away or exclude the irrelevent data for the fact at hand.
Probably we can make intelligent system better by associating the forgetting threshold to each and every fact & data and modifying it over time based on the usage frequency.
www.browsetoknow.blogspot.com
sman
11/30/2007
Posts:11
Sure, to start with a working model such emphasis should be considered....but after making it work; to make it work _well_ such constraints should be solved.
futureprogress.net
Gabriel
11/30/2007
Posts:1
tdietterich
11/30/2007
Posts:1
urian1975
11/30/2007
Posts:16
The point I wolud like to emphasis is that we can assign some weights to the facts/data and imporve the data access decisions. These weights are dynamically modified based on the frequency of the data references. As the weights vary for each data unit in the knowledge base, accessiing the frequently reffered data should be made faster than rarely accessed data(The way brain recalls). I do not know whether this is a relevant and required future for your system.
Thank You.
sman
sman
12/01/2007
Posts:11
Watcher
12/04/2007
Posts:2
shadfurman
12/04/2007
Posts:3
In neurophysiology it has been observed that with direct electrical stimulation to the brain anything from your past is available and nothing is forgotten. A lot of old knowledge is waiting for an association to a stimulation or need to be recalled. I hope computers can store everything I have ever experienced or thought and associate and recall it when needed. I made a rough calculation that if you had a video camera in HD recording everything you saw, heard or said for 100 years it would require 151.3 Quadrabytes to store it all, perhaps called a lifebyte. Add the sum total of human knowledge the AI system can access, I think we would have a much faster development of new knowledge.
zzyzzy
12/03/2007
Posts:6
jaggspb
12/03/2007
Posts:9
shadfurman
12/04/2007
Posts:3
http://www.opencyc.com
shadfurman
12/04/2007
Posts:3
Just like a living cell has millions of chemical processes which are routinely executed and orchestrated to achieve the purposes and goals of the organism, so too do large corporate organizations have work "processes" in which many people engage in patterns of email, phone calls, paper forms, software usage, and face-to-face communications.
These interactions stream together into processes, which are now being targeted for identification and automation through the "BPM" methodology of IT system design, and execution in BPM software platforms.
The task of identifying and designing these work processes in corporations is the current bottleneck in this billion dollar, emerging industry.
Automatically mining process data from organizations is a holy grail in the BPM industry, and it would be great if this technology were applied to this specific business problem.
jwalter1
12/09/2007
Posts:1