Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

The Incapacitating Flashlight

An LED flashlight makes culprits vomit.

By Prachi Patel

Monday, August 06, 2007

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon

Soon cops' flashlights might not only temporarily blind bad guys: they might also stop them in their tracks by disorienting them and making them nauseatingly sick. When suspects turn away or reel, cops or border-security agents can nab and handcuff them.

Nonlethal weapon: A flashlight (above) contains layers of electronic control circuitry, multicolored LEDs, and special optics that together produce disorienting and nausea-inducing patterns of ultrabright flashing colors.
Credit: Department of Homeland Security

The flashlight, which is being developed for the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), uses a range finder to measure the distance to the target's eyes so that it can adjust the energy of the light to a level that won't cause permanent damage. Then it rapidly shoots out pulses of light from an array of ultrabright light emitting diodes (LEDs).

The flashes incapacitate a person in two different ways, says Robert Lieberman, CEO of Intelligent Optical Systems, based in Torrance, CA, which is making the device. The flashes temporarily blind a person, as any bright light would, and the light pulses, which quickly change both in color and duration, also cause what Lieberman calls psychophysical effects. These effects, whose effectiveness depends on the person, range from disorientation to vertigo to nausea, and they wear off in a few minutes.

It's not clear why the changing light pulses cause this effect, even though the effect has been well documented, Lieberman says. Helicopter pilots, for example, have been known to crash because they get disoriented by the choppy flashes of sunlight coming through the chopper's spinning blades.

The DHS is funding research on the new nonlethal weapon. According to a DHS press release, cops, border-security agents, and the National Guard could be armed with the new flashlight by 2010. The device is part of a larger effort to develop nonlethal weapons that can help law-enforcement and military personnel control crowds and riots, both in antiterrorist actions and in hostage situations.

The LED flashlight comes with a few caveats. The person being targeted could easily look away, or he or she might be wearing heavily tinted glasses. And the device would not be useful to, say, a security agent who is chasing a suspected attacker. "It is designed to be used on someone coming at you," Lieberman says. Also, the flashlight's effects are less during the day. But Lieberman notes that security agents will more likely face situations in which they need the device at night.

Glenn Shwaery, who researches nonlethal technology at the University of New Hampshire, says that authorities would use the flashlight, and other light-based "dazzler" technologies, to distract a suspect so that they can close in on him or her. "If you disorient or distract somebody and cause them to look away, then they can't focus on their task, which could be aiming a weapon at someone, or looking at a screen with sensitive information, or dialing a phone," he says.

Story continues below


There have been efforts to make dazzlers using lasers, but LEDs could be a safer choice. "Getting an eye-safe wavelength with a laser has been very difficult," Shwaery says. Because laser beams are energetic and focused, they could cause permanent damage to the eye. Shwaery adds that the new LED flashlight would be safe because it uses a range finder and adjusts the energy it throws out. "The ideal goal for nonlethal technologies is that they be scalable."

Researchers at Intelligent Optical Systems are now analyzing combinations of wavelengths and light intensities that have the strongest effect on people while remaining safe. They also need to make the device smaller and easier to carry. Right now, it's about 15 inches long and 4 inches wide. This fall, the team plans to test the flashlight extensively on people at Penn State University's Institute of Non-Lethal Defense Technology.

Tags

LED light

Comments

  • [no subject]
    It is always good to try something new, and to want to build a non-lethal deterrent is admirable, but since the culprit has only to shut his/her eyes or glance away from the flashlight, it doesn't seem a reliable deterrent.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    cyberpageman
    08/06/2007
    Posts:38
    Avg Rating:
    4/5
  • Good and Evil
    As everyone is probably already aware, any technology is neutral but has the capacity for good and evil purposes. I wonder how long it will take before governments start using these non-lethal technologies to control it's own citizenry.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    jamesdwms
    08/06/2007
    Posts:2
  • Flip Side - A criminal thought
    1. Shoot at the light source, Ooops.
    2. Stand back 20 feet.
    3. Shoot then ask.
    4. Oooo  Let's get some of them and throw our guns away.

    All things have good and bad aspects... Have we not learned from every war???  The bad guys don't follow rules. I.E. Iraq...
    Rate this comment: 12345

    JonD
    08/07/2007
    Posts:4
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
    • Re: Flip Side - A criminal thought
      good luck shooting back at a light source that is dazzling you -- note that it says the system adjusts to just short of damaging the eye. shooting at a flashlight only works if the light is a) not pointed at you, and b) held by some hollywood jackass that hasn't been taught proper tactical procedure.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      smithsomian
      08/07/2007
      Posts:71
      Avg Rating:
      4/5
  • Love it!!!!
    Until the Second Amendment is amended to outlaw lethal weaponry and only allow less than lethal weapons, as a person whose passion involves non-violent education of the world around me, I believe that this invention will be a stellar addition to the already awesome collection of less than lethal weaponry already available to our society. 

    Marilyn
    Marilyn's Non-Violent Planet
    http://www.non-violent.com
    Rate this comment: 12345

    badthing
    08/07/2007
    Posts:1
  • What about a Security Screensaver?
    So you put your computer to sleep and want to protect it from would be thieves or nosy co-workers. You set the "alarm" to go off when someone without the right password tries to wake your computer. Then, after 3 attempts and still no correct password, BOOM you get the Spew Light beemed at you.

    I love it. Ok minions make it happen.

    I suppose the down side would be that when you did finally come back to your safe and secure computer it might have puke all over it. Maybe not such a good idea after all. Scrap that.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    cgehrke
    08/08/2007
    Posts:1
    Avg Rating:
    5/5
  • well
    well, since even criminals read the news, now that they're hip that this may be a possibility, It wouldn't be surprising that they simply throw on some sunglasses or other types of light filtering goggles. I wouldn't say this is the most effective thing worth budgeting for...
    Rate this comment: 12345

    TMacshane
    08/08/2007
    Posts:3
    • Re: well
      Actually, most thieves don't read a lot. Many react with complete surprise to video monitoring, and the police sometimes fool them into coming out of hiding by telling them that they have won a free prize or one sort or another, and all they have to do is pick it up. These scams have been publicized for several years now, but the police say that they continue to work.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      Trodo
      08/11/2007
      Posts:1
  • Nice idea but likely dangerous
    I shudder to think what one of these things can induce in those susceptible to epilepsy.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    weissadam
    08/08/2007
    Posts:1
  • flashlight
    need one them!!!
    Rate this comment: 12345

    truck055
    08/09/2007
    Posts:1
  • Seriously Bad Idea
    If 1 in 50 children and 1 in 100 adults have epilepsy, how can we even consider using this randomly without serious consequences? 
    Rate this comment: 12345

    jrandjr
    08/10/2007
    Posts:1
  • Permanent Damage?
    This thing has the potential to cause permanent blindness? The urping is no big deal but the white cane bothers me. Oh well, if you can't take a joke, to heck with you.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    Phineas
    08/12/2007
    Posts:93
    Avg Rating:
    4/5

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement

Videos

Malleable Maps, Artistic Robots and Bubble Interfaces
Technology Review January/February 2010

Current Issue

Security in the Ether
Information technology's next grand challenge will be to secure the cloud--and prove we can trust it.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Subscribe to Technology Review's daily e-mail update. Enter your e-mail address

TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES
Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology © 2010 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.