|
Thursday, July 19, 2007 Robotic Insect Takes OffResearchers have created a robotic fly for covert surveillance. By Rachel Ross
A life-size, robotic fly has taken flight at Harvard University. Weighing only 60 milligrams, with a wingspan of three centimeters, the tiny robot's movements are modeled on those of a real fly. While much work remains to be done on the mechanical insect, the researchers say that such small flying machines could one day be used as spies, or for detecting harmful chemicals. "Nature makes the world's best fliers," says Robert Wood, leader of Harvard's robotic-fly project and a professor at the university's school of engineering and applied sciences. The U.S. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency is funding Wood's research in the hope that it will lead to stealth surveillance robots for the battlefield and urban environments. The robot's small size and fly-like appearance are critical to such missions. "You probably wouldn't notice a fly in the room, but you certainly would notice a hawk," Wood says. Recreating a fly's efficient movements in a robot roughly the size of the real insect was difficult, however, because existing manufacturing processes couldn't be used to make the sturdy, lightweight parts required. The motors, bearings, and joints typically used for large-scale robots wouldn't work for something the size of a fly. "Simply scaling down existing macro-scale techniques will not come close to the performance that we need," Wood says. Some extremely small parts can be made using the processes for creating microelectromechanical systems. But such processes require a lot of time and money. Wood and his colleagues at the University of California, Berkeley, needed a cheap, rapid fabrication process so they could easily produce different iterations of their designs. Ultimately, the team developed its own fabrication process. Using laser micromachining, researchers cut thin sheets of carbon fiber into two-dimensional patterns that are accurate to a couple of micrometers. Sheets of polymer are cut using the same process. By carefully arranging the sheets of carbon fiber and polymer, the researchers are able to create functional parts. For example, to create a flexure joint, the researchers arrange two tiny pieces of carbon composite and leave a gap in between. They then add a sheet of polymer perpendicularly across the two carbon pieces, like a tabletop on two short legs. Two new pieces of carbon fiber are placed at either end of the polymer, as a final top layer. Once all the pieces are cured together, the resulting part resembles the letter H: the center is flexible but the sides are rigid. By fitting many little carbon-polymer pieces together, the researchers are able to create rather complicated parts that can bend and rotate precisely as required. To make parts that will move in response to electrical signals, the researchers incorporate electroactive polymers, which change shape when exposed to voltage. The entire fabrication process will be outlined in a paper appearing in an upcoming edition of the Journal of Mechanical Design. |
Wall-Climbing Robot
04/30/2007



Comments
Gaetano Marano on 07/19/2007 at 4:49 AM
51
so, the Minority Report's small disks surveillance microrobots will be no longer a sci-fi stuff...
-------------------------------
www.gaetanomarano.it
- do anyone knows how hyperlink the URLs posted in comments?
.
brunascle on 07/19/2007 at 10:55 AM
Web Developer
69
you cant.
:)
cwl on 07/19/2007 at 8:58 AM
2
I don't think so - looks like the weight is definitely less than 6 grams... Could it be as little as 60 mg ?
Uli
Rachel Kremen on 07/19/2007 at 10:46 AM
Online Managing Editor
6
abcarterjr on 07/19/2007 at 11:08 AM
45
into cluster of ice cubes then dropped from
UAV. When ice melts Flybots available to
be activated by an invisible collimnated beam of microwaves that can power as well as carry pulse code mission instructions.
EGZone on 07/19/2007 at 10:51 PM
3
Anyone interested in discussing such stuffs are welcome at: www.egzone.info
or simply visit my blog and open a new thread where we do have many domain experts in their respective fields at: www.egzone.info/blog
HarryStottle on 07/21/2007 at 12:09 PM
1
There are, of course, major technological obstacles still ahead. The "flies" will be utterly useless, for example, unless they can gather their energy from the environment (rather than carry powerpacks) and transmit the data they capture, in real time, a reasonable distance (at least a few kilometres so that high flying drones could harvest the signals). I'm guessing the transmission problem will eventually be solved using "swarm" technology to amplify the tiny output of individual flies into a cellphone scale signal which can reach the required distances.
But by far the biggest issue which needs to be resolved at this early stage - while we can still affect the outcome - is "who will have access to and control of this technology?"
As the earlier responses suggest, if we maintain our current passive stupidity, we will let Big Brother be the beneficiary and allow "him" to complete his increasing dominance of our lives, with the consequent erosion of liberty and privacy that will inevitably entail.
Or we can insist that this becomes democratically controlled technology which can form a major component of our defences against both Tyranny and Terrorism - as I am trying to outline here: http://www.fullmoon.nu/book/side_issues/IdentityCards.htm
david_chenard on 07/22/2007 at 12:44 AM
2
Asteroid Miner on 07/22/2007 at 11:29 AM
1
See:
http://www.comw.org/rma/fulltext/overview.html
http://carlisle-www.army.mil/usawc/Parameters/00autumn/metz.htm
The Next Twist of the RMA by Steven Metz
http://www.comw.org/rma/fulltext/overview.html
http://carlisle-www.army.mil/usassi/ssipubs/pubs2000/conflict/conflict.pdf
ARMED CONFLICT IN THE 21st CENTURY: THE INFORMATION REVOLUTION AND POST-MODERN WARFARE by Steven Metz April 2000
david_chenard on 07/22/2007 at 2:04 PM
2
Seed on 07/22/2007 at 4:11 PM
1
DonJoe on 07/24/2007 at 4:15 AM
1
Orwellian slip:
When you say one thing but mean your government.
DavidScottLewis on 07/24/2007 at 10:03 PM
3
The above statement is a bit subjective, perhaps even taken out of context. But taking it at face value, if MEMS fabrication techniques would have been used, what would have been the likely results?
Also, the article notes that the research team ultimately chose laser machining as the basis for its fabrication process. It should be noted that laser machining, especially centered on using ultrafast laser pulses, is a micromachining technique usually associated with MEMS fabrication.
I say this because a company I'm affiliated with, Zytech Solar, is using related techniques for the manufacturing of some solar collectors (panels), i.e., those with a focus on performance characteristics rather than cost (their European plants focus on quality differentiation; their plants in China focus on cost leadership): Yep, MEMS comes to the solar sector.
- David Scott Lewis
dmm on 07/25/2007 at 5:35 PM
128
Rather than focusing on building bio-inspired robots, I think we should be focusing on machine-to-organism interfaces. We must break out of the "all-electronics" box. We don't need robotic vehicles. We already HAVE robotic vehicles, of all sizes, for all kinds of terrain and payload -- animals. What we lack are CONTROL SYSTEMS for these vehicles, to make them go where we want.
georgep on 08/16/2007 at 8:19 AM
1
> cool. But a great fly robot was invented
> long ago. It has long range, fast speed,
> maneuverability, optical and olfactory sensors,
> and artificial intelligence, and it can refuel
> from the environment. Plus, it is incredibly
> cheap to produce, since it self-reproduces.
> It's called a fly.
> Rather than focusing on building bio-inspired
> robots, I think we should be focusing on
> machine-to-organism interfaces.
> [...] we lack [...] CONTROL SYSTEMS for these
> vehicles, to make them go where we want.
Indeed, excellent point for an alternative approach! Focuses on areas where our skills are stronger and let other entities (flies, birds) on the other side of the interface do the same.
Some steps are already being done unintentional, without aiming just this type of applications. There are animals that enjoy performing long flights (e.g. nightingales) for the benefit of humans (8 hours in wind tunnel – Lund University, Sweden). Some of them have rather good learning skills too.
Another issue (not only control system): how bringing back visual/audio information in real time from the "sensors"?
By the way, some primitive forms of control-systems (human-to-organism interfaces) exist too: horse and rider, by example.
Anyway, it will be exiting to follow this project too.
sudheerkumar_bobbala on 08/05/2007 at 12:50 AM
1