Technology Review - Published By MIT
Log in to My.TechnologyReview.com | Register
Advertisement
« Back 1 [2]

Wednesday, July 11, 2007

Robotic Farmer

Continued from page 1

By Duncan Graham-Rowe

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon

The Hortibot team is now planning to equip the robot with modular tools for precision spraying and mechanical weed removal. The aim here is to first identify the weeds, and then either spray them individually without hitting the crops or remove them without damaging nearby crops.

"In recent years, there has been an increasing interest in the use of mechanical intra-row weeders because of concern over environmental degradation and a growing demand for organically produced food," says Athanasios Dedousis, an agricultural engineer who has been developing such a system at Cranfield University, in the United Kingdom.

But getting it all working is likely to be a huge challenge, says Chris Melhuish, director of the Bristol Robotics Laboratory, in the United Kingdom. "To get a machine to do that is extremely difficult," he says.

Jørgensen agrees. There has been a lot of research using hyperspectral analysis to try to identify unique signatures of different plants based on the frequencies of light they absorb, he says, but it turns out that their absorption depends very much on the nutritional health of the plant.

So Jørgensen's lab is taking a different approach. "We use shape analysis," he says. By analyzing the proximity, orientation, and position of leaves relative to each other, it's possible to distinguish weeds from crop plants. Difficulties arise when the leaves from different plants overlap or obscure each other, but Jørgensen believes it's an approach that will eventually prove more reliable than spectral analysis.

Similarly, the mechanical removal of plants is far from straightforward, says Dedousis. Crop rows are not always straight, and plants are not equally spaced. And because some areas can have high levels of weed infestation, the mechanisms for removing the weeds need to be accurate down to about 50 millimeters, Dedousis says.

But the significant challenge is likely to come down to economics, says Melhuish. "At the moment, there is no way [the robot] would be cost-effective," he says. The estimated cost of Hortibot is about $55,000. With migrant workers in both Europe and the United States willing to work for low wages, it's difficult to see how the robot could compete, he says.

Hortibot's cost could be offset by its productivity, says Dedousis. Weeding is repetitive work. Robots can do it round-the-clock and in all weather conditions. For organic farmers, this could be a real boon. "Hortibot is the way towards the future," Dedousis says. But he predicts that it will take some years before it's ready for commercial farming.

Indeed, Jørgensen says that before the robot can be commercialized, some fundamental redesigns are necessary. These include increasing the wheel gauge to enable Hortibot to cover more rows of crops with each sweep and increasing the clearance to make the robot suitable for a wide range of crops.

« Back 1 [2]

Comments

  • This sounds like one of those envrionmentally friendly, yet very costly ideas.
    amulekii on 07/12/2007 at 6:09 PM
    Posts:
    10
    Avg Rating:
    2/5
    Is there any evidence that this robot will not cost a lot more than unskilled laborers or indiscriminate herbicide spraying?
    Rate this comment: 12345
    • Read article, then respond.
      lesfilip on 07/12/2007 at 8:49 PM
      Posts:
      2
      I don't mean to be rude, but why do you have time to reply to an article that you don't have the time to read all the way through?

      Have a nice day.
      Rate this comment: 12345
  • Cost is the biggest barrier
    briang1621 on 07/12/2007 at 7:47 PM
    Posts:
    35
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
    This is obvious but the biggest barrier to adoption here is the cost. This team in Demark has proven the technology, now they have to concentrate on lowering the cost to the sweet point. A preliminary market research survey will give an estimate of that sweet point, which is probably equivalent, a reduction in cost of $50,000 for and investment of $10K.  So, a machine costing $20K must save $100K to become reasonable for the general farmer as a new technology.
        www.techrd.com
    Brian Glassman
    Rate this comment: 12345
    • Re: Cost is the biggest barrier
      lesfilip on 07/12/2007 at 8:54 PM
      Posts:
      2
      May I ask where your 5:1 ratio of savings to cost came from? It seems like since financing is readily available to many farmers that it would take very little over 1:1 to be worth it.
      Rate this comment: 12345
  • operating costs
    jvmoye on 07/13/2007 at 10:10 AM
    Posts:
    6
    Avg Rating:
    4/5
    I am an Iowa farmer.
    Just tell me the acres per hour, direct costs of operation, how long I may leave it unattended, etc.
    Then give me a demo on my farm.  If it proves out they will sell like hot cakes just to threaten the chemical sales people.
    Rate this comment: 12345
Advertisement

Current Issue

Technology Review July/August 2008
The Business of Social Networks
The future of the Web is social. But can social-networking sites ever make money?
•  Subscribe
Save 41%
•  Table of Contents
•  MIT News

Magazine Services

Career Resources

MIT Technology Insider

Stories and breaking news from inside MIT about the latest research, innovations, and startups--in a convenient monthly e-newsletter. Subscribe today
Advertisement

More Technology News from Forbes

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES
Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology