|
Tuesday, June 19, 2007 Mapping the InternetRouting traffic through peer-to-peer networks could stave off Internet congestion, according to a new study. By Duncan Graham-Rowe
The increased use of peer-to-peer communications could improve the overall capacity of the Internet and make it run much more smoothly. That's the conclusion of a novel study mapping the structure of the Internet. It's the first study to look at how the Internet is organized in terms of function, as well as how it's connected, says Shai Carmi, a physicist who took part in the research at the Bar Ilan University, in Israel. "This gives the most complete picture of the Internet available today," he says. While efforts have been made previously to plot the topological structure in terms of the connections between Internet nodes--computer networks or Internet Service Providers that act as relay stations for carrying information about the Net--none have taken into account the role that these connections play. "Some nodes may not be as important as other nodes," says Carmi. The researchers' results depict the Internet as consisting of a dense core of 80 or so critical nodes surrounded by an outer shell of 5,000 sparsely connected, isolated nodes that are very much dependent upon this core. Separating the core from the outer shell are approximately 15,000 peer-connected and self-sufficient nodes. Take away the core, and an interesting thing happens: about 30 percent of the nodes from the outer shell become completely cut off. But the remaining 70 percent can continue communicating because the middle region has enough peer-connected nodes to bypass the core. With the core connected, any node is able to communicate with any other node within about four links. "If the core is removed, it takes about seven or eight links," says Carmi. It's a slower trip, but the data still gets there. Carmi believes we should take advantage of these alternate pathways to try to stop the core of the Internet from clogging up. "It can improve the efficiency of the Internet because the core would be less congested," he says. To build their map of the Internet, published in the latest issue of the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, the researchers enlisted the assistance of 5,000 online volunteers who downloaded a program to help identify the connections between the 20,000 known nodes. The distributed program sends information requests, or pings, to other parts of the Internet and records the route of the information on each journey. Previous efforts had relied upon only a few dozen large computers to carry out this task, says Carmi. But by using this distributed approach, which meant collecting up to six million measurements a day over a period of two years from thousands of observation points around the world, it was possible to reveal more connections, says Scott Kirkpatrick, a professor of computer science and engineering at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, who also took part in the study. In fact, the project has already identified about 20 percent more of the interconnections between Internet nodes than ever before. |



Comments
brunascle on 06/19/2007 at 12:49 PM
Web Developer
70
when you say "node", you mean routers, correct? and the core would be mostly the routers on the main internet backbone? a PC wouldnt really be a "node" in this sense, because your ISP would only be sending you packets that are meant for you and not ones to be routed further, right?
and how exactly does someone become router? how could you be connected at that level, above the ISP? and do the main routers only forward packets to a white-list of other routers, or do they send them to everyone they're connected to?
scott kirkpatrick on 06/19/2007 at 3:36 PM
1
One small error in the article: My institution is the Hebrew University in Jerusalem. At Tel Aviv University you will find Yuval Shavitt and Eran Shir, who created the Dimes client which does all the measurements. Also the website, http://www.netdimes.org from which we hope you will download and install our measurement client, and join us in measureing the Internet.
scott
Rachel Kremen on 06/20/2007 at 9:13 AM
Online Managing Editor
6
quksilver on 06/27/2007 at 3:13 PM
1
In that case, those 80 "nodes" comprising the core of the Internet are actually *huge* networks, and removing any one, much less all, of those "nodes" would hardly be a trivial task. Plus, it seems pretty silly to even consider what removing those 80 nodes might do. That requires the assumption that removing those 80 nodes would not affect the rest of the nodes in any way. And anything that could remove even one of the nodes in its entirety would likely affect a fairly significant portion of the non-core nodes.
mofoghlu on 06/20/2007 at 6:33 PM
1
http://www.ofoghlu.net/log/2007/06/mapping_the_internet.html
I have three questions, the first being a request rather than a question, for the full citation for the article mentioned in passing, "published in the latest issue of the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences", maybe the latest issue linked is now a more recent one, as it didn't seem to be there? In addition I couldn't find it listed on the first author's home page, but I did find an earlier article (that I linked in the blog entry).
The second question is how, if at all, this work relates/compares to the CAIDA work on AS topology mapping for IPv4 and IPv6, and their tools such as skitter? I was surprised CAIDA this similar work wasn't mentioned in the article I did find, that did seem based on a very similar AS topology analysis, at a high level.
The third is whether the tool you used could be used to map IPv6 as well as IPv4 topologies? I'm just downloading and installing the DIME client now....
netalter on 06/21/2007 at 4:36 AM
4
In addition NetAlter promises to be free from hacking and virus. More information on this available on their website. netalter.com
orgnet on 07/08/2007 at 4:06 PM
2
1) dense core
2) less connected periphery
3) outer ring of isolates
http://orgnet.com/emergent_community2.png
skirkp on 07/13/2007 at 10:41 AM
1
scott