The Chinese Solar Machine Layer by Layer Fire in the Library The Mystery Behind Anesthesia
Long-distance call: Entangled photons were sent 144 kilometers from a light source on La Palma to a receiver on Tenerife (top) housed in a local observatory (bottom).
Institute for Experimental Physics, University of Vienna
Researchers take a big step toward their goal of spy-proof communications via satellites.
European scientists have broken a distance record for sending quantum information from one place to another, paving the way for a system that relies on the laws of physics to provide communications that can't be tapped. If they can extend the reach of their signal a little further, they'll be able to use satellites to send perfectly secure data around the world.
The team used principles of quantum mechanics to create an encryption key in two locations simultaneously: one in a lab on La Palma, in the Canary Islands, and the second in an observatory on the neighboring island of Tenerife, 144 kilometers away. Such an encryption key can be used to encode data that only the sender and the receiver can decode.
"We want to see whether it is possible at all to establish worldwide quantum communication, worldwide quantum cryptography," says Anton Zeilinger, a professor of physics at the Institute for Experimental Physics at the University of Vienna, Austria. His team, along with a team led by Harald Weinfurter of the Max Planck Institute of Quantum Optics, in Garching, Germany, published its results online on June 3 in the journal Nature Physics.
To create the key, the team first had to create pairs of entangled photons. Entanglement, which Albert Einstein called "spooky action at a distance," means that the fate of one photon is tied up with the fate of the other. Measuring any quantum mechanical property of one photon automatically changes that same property in its entangled partner, no matter the distance between them.
In this case, the team measured polarization. Light can be polarized in any direction; it's a measure of which direction the light waves are fluctuating in--horizontal or vertical, for example. Researchers created entangled pairs of photons by firing a powerful laser beam through a crystal. For each photon that went in, two weaker, entangled photons came out. The researchers bounced one half of each pair off a mirror to a local light detector on La Palma. They sent the other photon through a lens and out across the water, where a telescope on Tenerife caught it and sent it to a second light detector.
"I have these two photons, and if I measure them on both ends and I ask them, 'Are you horizontally or vertically polarized?'--a binary choice--they will give a random answer," says Zeilinger. "But because of the entanglement, both will give the same answer. On both sides you get a zero or on both sides you get a one."
Every time the detectors registered a photon and measured its polarization, that counted as a bit. A photon polarized in one direction was a one, and a photon polarized in the opposite direction was a zero. Add enough bits together, and you get an encryption key. And it's impossible to steal that key without the users' knowing about it. If someone were to intercept the flying photons , he could measure them himself, then send them on to the receiver. But the act of measuring them would change their quantum mechanical properties, so he'd be immediately exposed.
Is it really true that it can't be broken / tapped?
I read, "If someone were to intercept the flying photons , he could measure them himself, then send them on to the receiver. But the act of measuring them would change their quantum mechanical properties, so he'd be immediately exposed."
If I have the intelligence and dollars so that I can tap into the system and read it in the first place then I would argue that I also have the intelligence, dollars, and equipment to create from scratch that what I had just read. It's not about continuing to pass along what I had just read, but rather stop what I had just read from continuing, and then recreating that from scratch and then putting that back into the flow stream to the final destination.
It seems straightforward to me. Am I missing something here? I'm not yet convinced that it is 100% impossible to tap / crack into it.
Your responses genuinely appreciated.
Jim
Re: Is it really true that it can't be broken / tapped?
I think applying quantum entanglement for cryptography is like killing a fly with TNT.
But if it payrolls research, so be it.
Re: Is it really true that it can't be broken / tapped?
i'm a little confused on this part as well.
i understand why intercepting the message would screw up the communication between point A and point B, but i dont see would you couldnt do a man-in-the-middle attack and set up a new communication between the attacker and point B.
Re: Is it really true that it can't be broken / tapped?
ah, as it turns out quantum cryptography _is_ vulnerable to this type of man-in-the-middle attack. both sides need to verify the other's identity before proceeding (probably by cryptographic signing, or something like that).
more info: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_cryptography
I don't understand everything with this technology. But if you can capture the photons and intercept them. Then couldn't you make it so that the photons can not reach the desired place? Another words a terrorist or some other criminal org. might try to disrupt activity for some reason.
"the random sequences of numbers generated to make today's encryption keys aren't truly random"
Maybe sometimes, but true random number generators are commercially available.
Manufacturing in the United States is in trouble. That's bad news not just for the country's economy but for the future of innovation.
This document is part of the “How-To Guide for Most Common Measurements” centralized resource portal. This tutorial provides a detailed guide for measurement and device considerations to take temperature measurements using thermocouples. Get an introduction to thermocouples, which are inexpensive sensing devices widely used with PC-based data acquisition systems. Also review some specific thermocouple examples and learn how thermocouples work and ways to integrate them into a data acquisition measurement system.
View full PDF >
brunascle
65 Comments
"automatically changes its partner" is misleading
a lot of people have a hard time understanding why quantum entanglement doesnt violate special relativity (faster-than-light travel), and i think it's mostly due to wording like "Measuring any quantum mechanical property of one photon automatically changes that same property in its entangled partner"
measuring your photon does not change the entangled photon, in the normal sense of the word "change". that might imply that the entangled photon was a 1 before, but since you measured a 0 on your photon, the other one just changed to 0 as well. that's not what's happening. either both are 1 or both or 0, but you dont know which is the case yet.
the only weird part about this is that, in quantum mechanics, both of those 2 cases really do exist together until a measurement is made. both are 1 and both are 0 at the same time. when the measurement is made, 1 of those cases dissappears into nonexistence. which of the two is truly random.
the best explanation i've heard of this is the many words theory. before the measurement, two words blur together: one in which both are 1 and one in which both are 0. when the measurement is made, those 2 worlds split and can never interact again.
Reply
brunascle
65 Comments
Re: "automatically changes its partner" is misleading
i'm being pedantic, arent i?
Reply
Guest (jim-frank)
Re: "automatically changes its partner" is misleading
There's a time when pedantry is called for...
Reply
blunney
17 Comments
Re: "automatically changes its partner" is misleading
And doing a marvelous job of it, too, I must say! ;-)
Reply